ADVERTISEMENT

Family's private investigator: There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death

Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- it's about Seth Rich. And tons of weird stuff is getting uncovered.
 
Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- and there's tons of weird shit getting uncovered all the time.

This was not supposed to be an issue because Hillary was a shoe-in to win the election.
With logic like this, who needs facts or proof.
 
Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- it's about Seth Rich. And tons of weird stuff is getting uncovered.

"You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe."
 
  • Like
Reactions: wino
Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- it's about Seth Rich. And tons of weird stuff is getting uncovered.

You forgot to add...."according to all of the far right websites that I spend most of my time reading."
 
Oh my -- watch video:


Red Pill Guy: SR's parents are thanking "the internet" for doing their own investigating and the media is lying about it.

Actual video: SR's parents were thanking the donors to a gofundme account over a month ago.

Who's more of a liar?

Even if we were to make the quantum leap that there is truth to the conspiracy, the context in which the video is posted reeks of propaganda intended to mislead rather than an honest representation of the family's intent.
 
If he fails to deliver it for sure matters. Any momentum in the Seth rich case fizzles today if Kim doesn't bring the bombshell.

Only 'momentum' for legacy media, which needs a 'face' for the story to make it presentable for a quick segment before the next round of advertisements.


Below is the kind of research taking place within the hivemind of the Internet.



DAewp7AXoAAtlYv



John Podesta's sister:

DAdp3yWXkAQnc1I



DAegJfcXcAEnlpL



 
Only 'momentum' for legacy media, which needs a 'face' for the story to make it presentable for a quick segment before the next round of advertisements.

In other words, blindly lobbing bags of shit against a wall and hoping some of it sticks.

And when it doesn't, just throw more.

If Kim had the goods, and was seriously in it for the Rich family, why not come forth with what he has?
 
Last edited:
Only 'momentum' for legacy media, which needs a 'face' for the story to make it presentable for a quick segment before the next round of advertisements.


Below is the kind of research taking place within the hivemind of the Internet.



DAewp7AXoAAtlYv



John Podesta's sister:

DAdp3yWXkAQnc1I



DAegJfcXcAEnlpL





And all of that will exist in a universe that the left laughs at the people in the middle never hear about. Kim has a small opportunity with hannity and also drudge to force the hand of main stream media. If he doesn't deliver, hannity and drudge move on and Seth rich is thrown in the trash with sandy hook crisis actors and the republicans standing naked against the redwoods.
 
In other words, blindly lobbing bags of shit against a wall and hoping some of it sticks.

And when it doesn't, just throw more.

If Kim had the goods, and was seriously in it for the Rich family, why not come forth with what he has?
He is clearly worried about the Clinton assassination squads coming to New Zealand.

As I have always said, the best move when you have incriminating evidence on people you believe to be killers is to sit on it and make repeated threats to release the evidence.
 
Below is the kind of research taking place within the hivemind of the Internet.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hive-mind

a. a collective consciousness, analogous to the behavior of social insects, in which a group of people become aware of their commonality and think and act as a community, sharing their knowledge, thoughts, and resources

b. such a group mentality characterized by uncritical conformity and loss of a sense of individuality and personal accountability.

Ya don'y say...
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Kim has a small opportunity with hannity and also drudge to force the hand of main stream media. If he doesn't deliver, hannity and drudge move on .
...to the next bullshit theory that comes along and unites the mob.

and Seth rich is thrown in the trash with sandy hook crisis actors
...which is utterly and completely dispicable to the families who lost loved ones.

Kim has a small opportunity with hannity and also drudge to force the hand of main stream media.

...which I would hope he would deliver on if there were a shred of truth to it and he really cared about Seth Rich. For the family's sake, I hope he wasn't feeding them false hope.


PS - it's Wednesday morning in New Zealand.
 
And all of that will exist in a universe that the left laughs at the people in the middle never hear about. Kim has a small opportunity with hannity and also drudge to force the hand of main stream media. If he doesn't deliver, hannity and drudge move on and Seth rich is thrown in the trash with sandy hook crisis actors and the republicans standing naked against the redwoods.

Even the biggest "mainstream media" news shows like O'Reilly only drew 3 million viewers per night --- less than 1/100th of the US population. (And shrinking all the time because of increasing age of viewers)


Trump won the election entirely because of the Internet and social media --- dying models like Fox News played almost no role in helping Trump win, and had limited ability to hurt him.


That's why the "powers that be" are desperately trying to censor the Internet.

We shall see how this goes......but you do make a good point.
 
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hive-mind

a. a collective consciousness, analogous to the behavior of social insects, in which a group of people become aware of their commonality and think and act as a community, sharing their knowledge, thoughts, and resources

b. such a group mentality characterized by uncritical conformity and loss of a sense of individuality and personal accountability.

Ya don'y say...

Thank you for proving my point.


image.jpg
 
Red Pill Guy: SR's parents are thanking "the internet" for doing their own investigating and the media is lying about it.

Actual video: SR's parents were thanking the donors to a gofundme account over a month ago.

Who's more of a liar?

Even if we were to make the quantum leap that there is truth to the conspiracy, the context in which the video is posted reeks of propaganda intended to mislead rather than an honest representation of the family's intent.

@NZ Poke your thoughts? And try to stay on topic this time.
 
You don't seem to be capable of defending your bullshit on it's own merits. Just drown out the doubters with the same old tropes and memes.

Don't get mad at me -- ask *yourself* why you were willing to believe those predictions from waxy talking heads.


Considering the same talking heads persuaded us into supporting invading Iraq --- will you admit their recent track record for predictions and advice is substandard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Don't get mad at me -- ask *yourself* why you were willing to believe those predictions from waxy talking heads.


Considering the same talking heads persuaded us into supporting invading Iraq --- will you admit their recent track record for predictions and advice is substandard?
Yep, you have zero interest in standing behind anything you post. Just pass the buck. Absolutely pathetic, pepe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
Don't get mad at me -- ask *yourself* why you were willing to believe those predictions from waxy talking heads.


Considering the same talking heads persuaded us into supporting invading Iraq --- will you admit their recent track record for predictions and advice is substandard?

I have said repeatedly that their predictions and advice is substandard, but you've just chosen another blue pill to replace the one they are promoting.

Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- it's about Seth Rich. And tons of weird stuff is getting uncovered.

How is that anything but admitting that substandard predictions and advice matter not one whit to what you're gonna believe.

It's not.
 
Last edited:
Yep, you have zero interest in standing behind anything you post. Just pass the buck. Absolutely pathetic, pepe.

As far as I recall, I was one of the small handful of posters on here (Guns was another) who was always consistent that Trump had an extremely high likelihood of winning the election.


They weren't blind predictions and I never made guarantees -- but I never wavered for a solid year.


People on this board will vouch for my consistency about Trump and his chances of winning (including during the various "this is the End of Trump" moments - like above), and it's also that way in real life.


I have a core group of republicans in my life who never thought Trump would win (like my Dad) --- whenever I'm around them today I can always go "who was right?" while pointing to myself and laughing (and they'll -all vouch for it and say "you were") -- I was one of the only people who always knew.


They (like a few of you) called me a "conspiracy theorist" because of the "strange" sources of my information -- but I was the one who was right in the end.

So in that sense, while sometimes I can be incorrect, I stand tall on the biggest issue of all. (The 2016 election)


I don't recall having and discussions with you during the election period.
 
As far as I recall, I was one of the small handful of posters on here (Guns was another) who was always consistent that Trump had an extremely high likelihood of winning the election.


They weren't blind predictions and I never made guarantees -- but I never wavered for a solid year.


People on this board will vouch for my consistency about Trump and his chances of winning (including during the various "this is the End of Trump" moments - like above), and it's also that way in real life.


I have a core group of republicans in my life who never thought Trump would win (like my Dad) --- whenever I'm around them today I can always go "who was right?" while pointing to myself and laughing (and they'll -all vouch for it and say "you were") -- I was one of the only people who always knew.


They (like a few of you) called me a "conspiracy theorist" because of the "strange" sources of my information -- but I was the one who was right in the end.

So in that sense, while sometimes I can be incorrect, I stand tall on the biggest issue of all. (The 2016 election)


I don't recall having and discussions with you during the election period.

And that's why you've swallowed the /pol/ blue pill?

Because you were right on the election?

Okay, I guess.
 
As far as I recall, I was one of the small handful of posters on here (Guns was another) who was always consistent that Trump had an extremely high likelihood of winning the election.


They weren't blind predictions and I never made guarantees -- but I never wavered for a solid year.


People on this board will vouch for my consistency about Trump and his chances of winning (including during the various "this is the End of Trump" moments - like above), and it's also that way in real life.


I have a core group of republicans in my life who never thought Trump would win (like my Dad) --- whenever I'm around them today I can always go "who was right?" while pointing to myself and laughing (and they'll -all vouch for it and say "you were") -- I was one of the only people who always knew.


They (like a few of you) called me a "conspiracy theorist" because of the "strange" sources of my information -- but I was the one who was right in the end.

So in that sense, while sometimes I can be incorrect, I stand tall on the biggest issue of all. (The 2016 election)


I don't recall having and discussions with you during the election period.
So your answer to any question about the validity of your spam is "I was right about the election"?

My 7-year old daughter told me we were going to beat OU in 2014, but that doesn't mean I'm going to cash in my 401k so she can fly to Scotland on a unicorn to attend Hogwarts.

FWIW, I listened mostly to the 538 camp (who gave Trump much more of a chance - about 1/3 - than any MSM outlet).

You seem to believe that your being correct about the election grants you carte blanche to spread outright falsehoods.

Strange sources are fine as long as the info checks out.

When those sources are disingenuous about the information they are spreading, they lose credibility. When you continue to stand by them, you lose credibility.

Kudos on calling the election.

Even the sucker catches a piece of the flop sometimes.
 
Last edited:
Even if Kim Dotcom fails to deliver anything important today (he may not) --- it's not going to matter.

This isn't about Kim Dotcom --- it's about Seth Rich. And tons of weird stuff is getting uncovered.
Tons? Can you enumerate? Do us the solid of excluding the disrepudiated PI crap....
 
So your answer to any question about the validity of your spam is "I was right about the election"?

My 7-year daughter told me we were going to beat OU in 2014, but that doesn't mean I'm going to cash in my 401k so she can fly to Scotland on a unicorn to attend Hogwarts.

FWIW, I listened mostly to the 538 camp (who gave Trump much more of a chance - about 1/3 - than any MSM outlet).

You seem to believe that your being correct about the election grants you carte blanche to spread outright falsehoods.

Strange sources are fine as long as the info checks out.

When those sources are disingenuous about the information they are spreading, they lose credibility. When you continue to stand by them, you lose credibility.

Kudos on calling the election.

Even the sucker catches a piece of the flop sometimes.

468.gif
 
Nope. Let's see where it goes.
Fair enough.

But if we're going to keep score, let's also remember that I never said the entire thing was debunked. Just that the particular claims of the PI who went on FOX were debunked.







As well as the nature of the video featuring Seth's parents.
Oh my -- watch video:


Kim Dotcom gets an incomplete for now, but if he's got something that can connect the dots (as opposed to just throwing more dots on the wall), I'm all ears.
 

Rabbi Yosef was instrumental in the creation of the state of Israel and in what is today one of the largest political parties in the country. He was one of the most well known leaders from both a political and religious standpoint.

The quote you are attributing to him was made when he was 90 years old, so maybe he wasn't at his best from a mental standpoint (that's the give him the benefit of the doubt narrative).

But, after reading about him, I will say there is enough there to agree that he felt that Christians and Muslims were beneath the level of Jews. But, if you read further, you will see that he also stated that the 6 million Jews, who died in the Holocaust were destined to perish due to sins of Jews in prior years. He also criticized Israeli soldiers for not "keeping the Sabbath holy" by ceasing all other activities and only studying Torah during the 24 hours of the Sabbath. He said that this was the reason that soldiers died during war.

To sum it all up, he was well respected within the State of Israel, but I'm sure that a lot of people thought he was eccentric and a bit "out there". He was definitely very opinionated. Basically, he criticized and looked down all but the most orthodox Jews, who dedicate themselves entirely to the Torah and to god. He did many great things for his country. I'm sure there were a lot of people, who attended his funeral, that thought he deserved to be honored even though they did not agree with everything he said during his life.

I don't know if it is even close to a good comparison, but this might be like if one of our founding fathers said a bunch of controversial things, yet had a huge turnout for his funeral despite all of the crazy things he said and ridiculous beliefs that he held.

But, go ahead and take one of his quotes, plus the attendance numbers for his funeral, and continue to use that to drive your antisemitic narrative. Maybe some, who read this board, will buy in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_xl72qcu5isp39
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT