Family's private investigator: There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death
- Thread starter GunsOfFrankEaton
- Start date
May I?
1) No, they clearly have not been. We all know that.
2) Here's one reason/explanation/anectote...
https://nypost.com/2018/09/25/a-shocking-number-of-us-murders-went-unsolved-last-year/
A new FBI report found that roughly 40 percent of the nation’s slayings went unsolved last year.
The bureau looked at 2017 crime and arrest data from 16,000 law enforcement agencies across the country and found that only 61.6 percent of reported murders were “cleared.”
The FBI considers a murder case cleared when a person is arrested, charged and turned over to courts, or when offenders are identified but cannot be arrested because they died or can’t be extradited.
That leaves 38.4 percent of the 15,657 murders reported nationwide unsolved — 6,012 in all, according to FBI data.
------------------------------------------------------
Besides that, what was the point of the questions?
Maybe I missed something, but I thought that was the case all along, save for the CDS conspiracy nuts.
I thought we'd had this conversation before. And sure as shit, we had.
It was hilarious watching you going down the conspiracy hole that everyone who used the twitter share button was a Russian bot. L-O-L
I'm not so sure you're correct. Syskatine seems to have a difficult time acknowledging that fact. So maybe "all of us but one" would be accurate.
Cool, y’all can continue your pissing contest.
I still don’t understand the point of asking the question in the first place. Did I miss where he suggested otherwise to being with?
Thanks for your permission to continue. That's valuable here.
I'm not sure the rest of your post is in English.
Typing on my phone turned begin —> being.
I see the confusion now. Apologies. Allow me to rephrase.
Why did you ask if there had been an arrest/charge in the murder? Had anyone suggested that one was imminent?
Last edited:
Neither have I. Just making sure I didn’t miss it.
So then why raise a question to which you already know the answer?
I'll refer you back to the dork that had difficulty answering the question. Maybe you should ask syskatoon.
How would he know what you’re thinking? I certainly don’t assume to.
Asking the person who either couldn’t or wouldn’t answer the original question what the questioner’s motive doesn’t seem like the most efficient approach.
Seems like you would know better why you asked it. Why defer?
Ummm... those are what Flynn COULD have been charged with if he didn't plead guilty to lying to the FBI.
Similar threads
