I've encouraged you to go watch interviews of her. It appears though you have no desire to do that and even if you did, you would still make the claim that Harris isn't intelligent. I'm starting to think @my_2cents is right about you when it comes to Harris.I find it unsettling when people say things backfired on Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard knew from the beginning she was not going to get the nomination, her 2016 “treason” against Hillary assured her of that. She lost faith when she witnessed first hand the deep corruption within the party, and resolved to do everything in her power to shine a light of truth on what is happening to us, particularly as it pertains to our never ending regime change wars, a subject neither party dared talk about. She determined being a congresswoman was not worth the price of her soul. That was something the party loyalists could never allow.
I never said Tulsi ended Harris’ career, that’s something @my_2cents dreamed he heard when I said she ended her presidential aspirations.
I think partisan attacks are as unattractive as you. I’m an unaffiliated libertarian, and have been since 1968. When I say I see no intelligence coming from Harris I don’t say it for partisan purposes. I say it because I mean it. You keep saying there are multiple examples proving she is intelligent. All I ask is for you to show one to me.
As for Tulsi, she is a smart woman too. I think she just made some bad political mistakes that hurt her with Democrats. I have nothing against Tulsi except that I don't agree with her politically on a number of issues. At this point, she is rather irrelevant though politically. Unless she decides to run a third-party campaign for President. That could be interesting.