Actually, "a wide variety of accounts were impacted". Funny you don't see that. Not unexpected, but funny.
So how does Libs of tic toc change the narrative for you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, "a wide variety of accounts were impacted". Funny you don't see that. Not unexpected, but funny.
It doesn't. My presumption is they had an advertising winner with LoTT. They didn't with @kathygriffin - hence the difference in approach.So how does Libs of tic toc change the narrative for you?
It doesn't. My presumption is they had an advertising winner with LoTT. They didn't with @kathygriffin - hence the difference in approach.
Hypothetical? SMFHWho violated the first amendment in your hypothetical?
Agnostic? Who said they were agnostic?So that was supposed to show Harry that Twitter was agnostic.
Good one.
Was it just conservatives? Can you explain the flags on LibsofTikTok to me? They seemed to have extraordinary protections vs. being de-emphasized. How does that fit your narrative?
Just to be clear, I have not been a fan of TWTR for a good long time. It is a fundamentally unsustainable business IMO. Jack couldn't get it done. Williams made some progress but couldn't satisfy growth expectations. Costello made it worse. Jack came back and really didn't even give it much of a try. Parag couldn't fix it. I think Elon will give it a good go, but also likely can't salvage something so fundamentally broken.
I think the analysis was selective. Outrage is a surefire way to engage your target demographic. That is the fundamental problem for Twitter.You saw the same thread I did. Do you think the former ny times reporter is hiding something?
There is nothing that was released in the past several days that wasn't already explicitly known or reasonably inferred from the history of TWTR.I can’t explain any of it since I don’t work for the fbi or their media extensions. I’m only going off what was exposed yesterday.
The government and its henchmen are tipping the scale of conversations while you and other evil and/or brain dead leftists ignore or down play it.
I think the analysis was selective. Outrage is a surefire way to engage your target demographic. That is the fundamental problem for Twitter.
There is nothing that was released in the past several days that wasn't already explicitly known or reasonably inferred from the history of TWTR.
I am not ignoring anything, I am a bit surprised that this is some great "revelation" to you.
I think it is ludicrous to believe that Twitter, or any other sizable corporation, is willing to sacrifice its financial viability in the name of a political ideology.
Lol - you could easily say "half the country has never been so ready to be alienated." Gotta be hard on you when so much of the world is out to get you.That last sentence is a doozy.
They’ve never been more willing to alienate half the country.
Lol - you could easily say "half the country has never been so ready to be alienated." Gotta be hard on you when so much of the world is out to get you.
Lol - you could easily say "half the country has never been so ready to be alienated." Gotta be hard on you when so much of the world is out to get you.
I thought Facebook in 2016 was Russian bots misinforming me thus why I voted for Kanye?They seem to forget their complete lack of concern when facebook let cambridge analytica mine our personal info for Trump’s campaign lol
Rules for thee…..and whatnot
I thought Facebook in 2016 was Russian bots misinforming me thus why I voted for Kanye?
Yea in 2020 dip shit. You now know my votes. lol I am going to hug you Champ.
I think the analysis was selective. Outrage is a surefire way to engage your target demographic. That is the fundamental problem for Twitter.
There is nothing that was released in the past several days that wasn't already explicitly known or reasonably inferred from the history of TWTR.
I am not ignoring anything, I am a bit surprised that this is some great "revelation" to you.
I think it is ludicrous to believe that Twitter, or any other sizable corporation, is willing to sacrifice its financial viability in the name of a political ideology.
Your comprehension skills need work.Interesting how all of a sudden the left has somehow changed their tune, now admitting Twitter was in fact censoring along political lines and it's no big deal. That is quite the departure from the past when the leftist denied it was taking place, said there was no evidence to that and it was all just another right wing conspiracy. Now you act like you knew the entire time and never tried to sway the discussion with your lies. Same thing leftist do every time they are caught.
Didn't you spend months telling us it was all a conspiracy theory and now you change your tune and it's OK because of some mumbo jumbo advertisers BS.Your comprehension skills need work.
No.Didn't you spend months telling us it was all a conspiracy theory and now you change your tune and it's OK because of some mumbo jumbo advertisers BS.
So....the left has now said that the laptop, censoring and the information is real, but don't look because it's old news that we just acknowledged.Interesting how all of a sudden the left has somehow changed their tune, now admitting Twitter was in fact censoring along political lines and it's no big deal. That is quite the departure from the past when the leftist denied it was taking place, said there was no evidence to that and it was all just another right wing conspiracy. Now you act like you knew the entire time and never tried to sway the discussion with your lies. Same thing leftist do every time they are caught.
last part passes the sniff testSo....the left has now said that the laptop, censoring and the information is real, but don't look because it's old news that we just acknowledged.
Next will be that Joe is good father. I'm patiently waiting on that one, so we can review his fatherly accomplishments.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Old news. I thought you were better informed.
FBI says it ‘routinely notifies’ social media companies of potential threats following Zuckerberg-Rogan podcast
The FBI said that it “routinely notifies” private sector entities, including social media companies, of information related to potential threats after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Facebook limited…thehill.com
Is this really new to you?
Do you think word "censor" is honestly used in that sentence? I know you trust your preferred news outlets. Should you?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Public information requests and leaks later revealed the agency had a formalized process to flag Facebook to censor posts it viewed as disinformation. Federal officials would often send what they believed to be misinformation to CISA, which would then advise social media companies to censor the content."
University of Washington sued for withholding docs detailing professor's alleged role in DHS disinfo campaign
A watchdog group sued the University of Washington for its failure to provide documents on how one of its professors allegedly coordinated with DHS on disinformation.www.foxnews.com
Just stop. I already told you that model of DodgeAllen is out to pasture. Surely you have something of substance in that treehouse.Do you think word "censor" is honestly used in that sentence? I know you trust your preferred news outlets. Should you?
Do you think word "censor" is honestly used in that sentence?Just stop. I already told you that model of DodgeAllen is out to pasture. Surely you have something of substance in that treehouse.
PS, you posted a link from August. There's a weeee little bit of info that has come out since then. No, you probably won't find it on The View.
Do you think Joe Biden is a good POTUS?Do you think word "censor" is honestly used in that sentence?
Obtuse. So, the FBI was helping compile really interesting tweets for ... what reason? Historical record? To amplify?Do you think word "censor" is honestly used in that sentence?
Oh the confusion created by the sleepy administration.My initial take? Meh. What surprised you? Is it shocking that Twitter, an advertiser supported platform, sought to promote content that <checking notes> was supportive of advertising?
So you are on the record that was an appropriate use of the word "censor"? Noted.Obtuse. So, the FBI was helping compile really interesting tweets for ... what reason? Historical record? To amplify?
His grade is up from C- to C+.Do you think Joe Biden is a good POTUS?
I see. You don't know the meaning of censor.So you are on the record that was an appropriate use of the word "censor"? Noted.
So yore saying the FBI censored content at Twitter, FB, et al?I see. You don't know the meaning of censor.
Well, yeah! Think about it? 😂So yore saying the FBI censored content at Twitter, FB, et al?
No. They asked the social media companies to do it as stated in the article:So yore saying the FBI censored content at Twitter, FB, et al?
Again, is the word censor accurate and honest in this statement?No. They asked the social media companies to do it as stated in the article:
"Public information requests and leaks later revealed the agency had a formalized process to flag Facebook to censor posts it viewed as disinformation. Federal officials would often send what they believed to be misinformation to CISA, which would then advise social media companies to censor the content."
Most definitelyAgain, is the word censor accurate and honest in this statement?
It depends on what your definition of what is is.Most definitely