Trump replaced Sarah Palin as the most attacked politician ever by MSM. Among my favorites: A Palin daughter sleepover pal spat made Page 1 of the NY Times. A Biden son dismissed from the Navy for drug abuse made Page 29A.
If a reporter says that Trump tried to shake down Ukraine, then tried to bury the memo, then lied about trying to bury the memo, would that be a left-leaning reporter, or just a reporter?
Geee, Clinton, that's uhhhh, you definitely gots a
You just got gifted a baker's dozen of donuts. Yer welcome. 😉
Yeah Rachel taught me to simply ask if reporting news is leftist. Because in MAGA's feeble, fragile, losing minds it is. It's not in support of a cult, so it's leftist.
The fact you think journalist today just report the news is both cute and pathetic.
It really doesn't ring a bell, does it? Huh? Who's Ukraine? Memo about what? Go call Hannity and tell me if reporting on that is "leftist" media.
My initial take? Meh. What surprised you? Is it shocking that Twitter, an advertiser supported platform, sought to promote content that <checking notes> was supportive of advertising?
Really you think the FBI meeting weekly with Twitter to tell them who, what, when and where to censor is acceptable?
So, Mr. Google, enlighten us. What was the FBI doing in their weekly meetings?
Old news. I thought you were better informed.
thehill.com
Give it up, Harry. The authoritarian left that is so admired by @davidallen has settled on the spin it wants to use to slither past the scandal: there’s nothing to see here, it’s overblown fake news not worth talking about and anyone who thinks otherwise should know the enlightened leftist elitists like David think you just look silly. Twitter bosses were working diligently to advance the authoritarian left’s cause so whatever method they used is acceptable. So accept it without complaint!
The FBI informed all the Social Media companies that a story about Hunter Biden could be coming out that was false even though the FBI had the laptop, knew the information on the laptop was true and didn't want the story out to the public because it would hurt Biden in the election. That is a blatant violation of the First Amendment and blatant election interference.Old news. I thought you were better informed.
FBI says it ‘routinely notifies’ social media companies of potential threats following Zuckerberg-Rogan podcast
The FBI said that it “routinely notifies” private sector entities, including social media companies, of information related to potential threats after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Facebook limited…
Is this really new to you?
Got it. The FBI tells them who, what, when and where to censor.Old news. I thought you were better informed.
FBI says it ‘routinely notifies’ social media companies of potential threats following Zuckerberg-Rogan podcast
The FBI said that it “routinely notifies” private sector entities, including social media companies, of information related to potential threats after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Facebook limited…
Is this really new to you?
Can you explain how what they did (curating #trending for example) amounts to "shadow banning"?
Who violated the first amendment in your hypothetical?
Was it just conservatives? Can you explain the flags on LibsofTikTok to me? They seemed to have extraordinary protections vs. being de-emphasized. How does that fit your narrative?
Actually, "a wide variety of accounts were impacted". Funny you don't see that. Not unexpected, but funny.
