I’m an outsider and it baffles me.
it shouldn’t baffle you
cales lucky as hell he didn’t get popped
cale gambled, won and is now too big to fail or face consequence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m an outsider and it baffles me.
It’s not a Cael or Tom Ryan or Tom Brands issue. It’s a why don’t you want more opportunities for our college athletes? I want Fix and Ringer making $100k a year post graduation, training at Oklahoma State helping Dustin Plott and whoever else comes through. Why don’t you? Why don’t certain fans want our favorite athletes making a living in our sport? I want all our best athletes to stay in the sport. I’d like to see a huge RTC at Oklahoma State! Complaining about what other programs have built won’t make that happen. Putting pressure on the coaches and administrators will. I’m on your side! I just want more opportunities and a level playing field. Forward not backwards.
I understand, but there are guidelines
You won’t find any NCAA regulation on RTC. You are correct. The NCAA shouldn’t have anything to do with Freestyle or Greco and definitely would lower the budgets for them. I wouldn’t want them regulating something they have nothing to do with. A good question would be why would the NCAA regulate a USAW facility?
I don't think you would find a soul who argue with any of this. The problem is we want to accomplish this without the fear that the NCAA is right around the corner ready to drop the hammer on RTCs and the programs who are utilizing them.
It is real easy to say go violate NCAA rules and the NCAA doesn't care about this when it isn't your rep and job on the line.
It’s a why don’t you want more opportunities for our college athletes? The point is we do all want more opportunities for college athletes. We are down to 76 Div 1 programs. Over 500 college programs have been dropped in the last 50-60 years. Of the D1 programs, many do not fully fund the lowly 9.9 scholarships allowed by the NCAA. How are these programs going to compete with the few programs that can source from boosters not only a fully funded college program but a fully funded “professional” club program? They won’t. More programs will be dropped. More opportunities for many college athletes will be lost. The opportunity for education and better futures for these wrestlers will be lost. More scholarships will be cut at a time when scholarships have never had more value.It’s not a Cael or Tom Ryan or Tom Brands issue. It’s a why don’t you want more opportunities for our college athletes? I want Fix and Ringer making $100k a year post graduation, training at Oklahoma State helping Dustin Plott and whoever else comes through. Why don’t you? Why don’t certain fans want our favorite athletes making a living in our sport? I want all our best athletes to stay in the sport. I’d like to see a huge RTC at Oklahoma State! Complaining about what other programs have built won’t make that happen. Putting pressure on the coaches and administrators will. I’m on your side! I just want more opportunities and a level playing field. Forward not backwards.
A USAW facility located on a NCAA member campus, paid for by a NCAA member’s booster’s money, with affiliations titled Penn State ROTC and Nittany Lion Wrestling Club and coached by coaches with NCAA certification. There seems to be a connection.You won’t find any NCAA regulation on RTC. You are correct. The NCAA shouldn’t have anything to do with Freestyle or Greco and definitely would lower the budgets for them. I wouldn’t want them regulating something they have nothing to do with. A good question would be why would the NCAA regulate a USAW facility?
It’s a why don’t you want more opportunities for our college athletes? The point is we do all want more opportunities for college athletes. We are down to 76 Div 1 programs. Over 500 college programs have been dropped in the last 50-60 years. Of the D1 programs, many do not fully fund the lowly 9.9 scholarships allowed by the NCAA. How are these programs going to compete with the few programs that can source from boosters not only a fully funded college program but a fully funded “professional” club program? They won’t. More programs will be dropped. More opportunities for many college athletes will be lost. The opportunity for education and better futures for these wrestlers will be lost. More scholarships will be cut at a time when scholarships have never had more value.
I want Fix and Ringer making $100k a year post graduation, training at Oklahoma State helping Dustin Plott and whoever else comes through. Why don’t you? I am sure everybody here wants this. I would wager most everybody here, myself included, want the same for Aaron Brooks and all other Penn St wrestlers. However, it needs to be done like every other sport that coexists with collegiate sports. College boosters endowing club programs to be used as carrots to recruit athletes with the intended purpose of winning NCAA championships is unique to college wrestling. More specifically, it is unique to a few college wresting programs that have put the quest for championships above the sport as a whole and have placed the sport at a crossroads which could take away the opportunities of thousands of wrestlers.
I want all our best athletes to stay in the sport. The pressure to make this happen needs to be placed on USAW and the wrestling community as a whole. If the sole goal of a wrestler post graduation is to win World and Olympic gold, then USAW needs to support them better. If the goal is to be a professional athlete and to make a living several times above the income of other recent graduates than professional opportunities typical to other sports need to be created. The wrestling community would need to support corporate sponsorships and/or support a viable league for athletes.
Regarding the camp $, Dave Mirikitani explained it in some detail.
There is the typical summer camp $ paid by the school (or the person running the camp). That's been around for years.
But under the current RTC model, there is now also booster $ paid to the athlete. He said one school allows up to $1500/day. In his example, the person running the camp might actually pay nothing for 4 days because the booster could pay the full $6000.
I like that all the participants are in agreement, but with different solutions. It is all doable with communication.And this is already illegal under NCAA rules. Current student athletes are only allowed to be paid the going rate:
From the NCAA Manual
13.12.2 Employment at Camp or Clinic. 13.12.2.1 Student-Athletes. A student-athlete may be employed in any sports camp or clinic, provided compensation is provided pursuant to the criteria of Bylaw 12.4.1. A student-athlete who only lectures or demonstrates at a camp/clinic may not receive compensation for his or her appearance at the camp/clinic. (Revised: 4/24/03 effective 8/1/03, 1/19/13 effective 8/1/13)
12.4 Employment. 12.4.1 Criteria Governing Compensation to Student-Athletes. Compensation may be paid to a student-athlete: [R] (Revised: 11/22/04, 4/19/19) (a) Only for work actually performed; and (b) At a rate commensurate with the going rate in that locality for similar services. 12.4.1.1 Athletics Reputation. Such compensation may not include any remuneration for value or utility that the student-athlete may have for the employer because of the publicity, reputation, fame or personal following that he or she has obtained because of athletics ability.
12.4.3 Camp/Clinic Employment, General Rule. A student-athlete may be employed by his or her institution, by another institution, or by a private organization to work in a camp or clinic as a counselor, unless otherwise restricted by NCAA legislation (see Bylaw 13.12 for regulations relating to camps and clinics).
All this, taken together, means that paying a current student athlete for camps is only allowed at the going rate and only if they work the camp, not if they just appear to show technique or attract campers. In no location is the going rate going to approach $1500/day. There is also a rule in there declaring that promising athletes payment is illegal, even if said payment is made after graduation.
It is interesting that the things most often discussed as being an issue with the RTCs are already illegal so I agree with Zeke. If you can prove it, report it. I don't think anyone believes that any college sport is clean so it stands to reason someone is cheating in wrestling (and perhaps many someones). That said, that doesn't mean RTCs are bad.
Finally, it strikes me that John's public comments (limited as they have been) mostly surround the one place where there does seem to be a conflict between RTC rules and NCAA rules, the 50-mile radius (NCAA local club) and the 250-mile radius (RTC standard). I can see where that could be an issue. However, calls for greater funding for the RTC have little to do with that. It is the senior-level athletes getting paid and being able to hang around Stillwater that is the big need, IMO. If John really thinks the NCAA will crack down on the contact with prospective student-athletes, he could still build out the senior-level aspect while self-restricting himself to NCAA local club rules if he so chooses.
And this is already illegal under NCAA rules. Current student athletes are only allowed to be paid the going rate:
From the NCAA Manual
13.12.2 Employment at Camp or Clinic. 13.12.2.1 Student-Athletes. A student-athlete may be employed in any sports camp or clinic, provided compensation is provided pursuant to the criteria of Bylaw 12.4.1. A student-athlete who only lectures or demonstrates at a camp/clinic may not receive compensation for his or her appearance at the camp/clinic. (Revised: 4/24/03 effective 8/1/03, 1/19/13 effective 8/1/13)
12.4 Employment. 12.4.1 Criteria Governing Compensation to Student-Athletes. Compensation may be paid to a student-athlete: [R] (Revised: 11/22/04, 4/19/19) (a) Only for work actually performed; and (b) At a rate commensurate with the going rate in that locality for similar services. 12.4.1.1 Athletics Reputation. Such compensation may not include any remuneration for value or utility that the student-athlete may have for the employer because of the publicity, reputation, fame or personal following that he or she has obtained because of athletics ability.
12.4.3 Camp/Clinic Employment, General Rule. A student-athlete may be employed by his or her institution, by another institution, or by a private organization to work in a camp or clinic as a counselor, unless otherwise restricted by NCAA legislation (see Bylaw 13.12 for regulations relating to camps and clinics).
All this, taken together, means that paying a current student athlete for camps is only allowed at the going rate and only if they work the camp, not if they just appear to show technique or attract campers. In no location is the going rate going to approach $1500/day. There is also a rule in there declaring that promising athletes payment is illegal, even if said payment is made after graduation.
It is interesting that the things most often discussed as being an issue with the RTCs are already illegal so I agree with Zeke. If you can prove it, report it. I don't think anyone believes that any college sport is clean so it stands to reason someone is cheating in wrestling (and perhaps many someones). That said, that doesn't mean RTCs are bad.
Finally, it strikes me that John's public comments (limited as they have been) mostly surround the one place where there does seem to be a conflict between RTC rules and NCAA rules, the 50-mile radius (NCAA local club) and the 250-mile radius (RTC standard). I can see where that could be an issue. However, calls for greater funding for the RTC have little to do with that. It is the senior-level athletes getting paid and being able to hang around Stillwater that is the big need, IMO. If John really thinks the NCAA will crack down on the contact with prospective student-athletes, he could still build out the senior-level aspect while self-restricting himself to NCAA local club rules if he so chooses.
I will tell you if teams and USA wrestling don’t begin to work with the NCAA to regulate and make some changes to the current setup at some point the NCAA will come in and make sweeping and fundamental changes and we could undue a bunch of progress.
It’s not a Cael or Tom Ryan or Tom Brands issue. It’s a why don’t you want more opportunities for our college athletes? I want Fix and Ringer making $100k a year post graduation, training at Oklahoma State helping Dustin Plott and whoever else comes through. Why don’t you? Why don’t certain fans want our favorite athletes making a living in our sport? I want all our best athletes to stay in the sport. I’d like to see a huge RTC at Oklahoma State! Complaining about what other programs have built won’t make that happen. Putting pressure on the coaches and administrators will. I’m on your side! I just want more opportunities and a level playing field. Forward not backwards.
Because it’s not available to anyone who doesn’t attend said school?Kids are not being paid to go to schools by RTCs. Kids attend schools with RTCs to pursue freestyle or Greco with access to partners.
Cause they are funded by Boosters of said school and cohabitate. NCAA doesn’t regulate big red sports eitherYou won’t find any NCAA regulation on RTC. You are correct. The NCAA shouldn’t have anything to do with Freestyle or Greco and definitely would lower the budgets for them. I wouldn’t want them regulating something they have nothing to do with. A good question would be why would the NCAA regulate a USAW facility?
Ok, so my son attends Penn State. So, this would be why we have no clue of additional payments to athletes? I’m trying to figure out who the elephant in the room is lol! I know who it is not, What schools boosters are paying the college recruits or athletes above market value?Because it’s not available to anyone who doesn’t attend said school?
Ok, so my son attends Penn State. So, this would be why we have no clue of additional payments to athletes? I’m trying to figure out who the elephant in the room is lol! I know who it is not, What schools boosters are paying the college recruits or athletes above market value?
Ok, so my son attends Penn State. So, this would be why we have no clue of additional payments to athletes? I’m trying to figure out who the elephant in the room is lol! I know who it is not, What schools boosters are paying the college recruits or athletes above market value?
No one is saying people are being paid in advance. At least I’m not.
Well I said it. And I posted multiple links in this thread where several coaches have strongly implied it. I'm not sure how anyone could read the comments made by Bono, Garland, Zeke & Askren and interpret it otherwise.
For those that think no college guys (or recruits) are being illegally paid according to the existing NCAA rules, what do you make of the comments made by those coaches?
Exactly, Cowguy, they are being promised coaching positions in the RTC after they graduate and these are not $12,000 per year positions. I understand they make as much as $100,00. Not saying every athlete is paid this but the top ones apparently are. This is an illegal inducement and you do not need to be a lawyer to figure it out. The kicker is not how much they are being paid as I think too long schools including OK State have paid student coaches a pittance but the promise of these jobs.I didn’t say not being paid. I said being paid in advance.
I didn’t say not being paid. I said not being paid in advance.
the RTC’s have created an un level playing field
period end of story
If a Penn State wants to be the school to train Freestyle athletes I say let it but they should not be allowed to break the rules of the NCAA or compete with the NCAA teams that follow the rules. I am in agreement with with those in this thread who expressed more interest in watching our Cowboys compete in Folkstyle than following Freestyle either world or Olympics. I watch freestyle and cheer for our wrestlers but it is not with the same enthusiasm I watch Folkstyle.Below is the Track podcast on the new RTC regulations effective beginning 9/1/19.
Discussion starts around the 35:45 mark. It covers mostly minor stuff, except for a new rule that you can no longer hire parents as RTC coaches going forward.
Discussion on the bigger stuff about paying current college guys (yes, current) or promising them jobs after graduation starts around the 53 mark. Basically the regulations now explicitly state that stuff is not allowed. And any violations must be reported in writing to USAW.
Now will anyone report another school/RTC?
https://www.trackwrestling.com/Port...858&twSessionId=rsezwhfghv&videoId=1685055132
So, now does this mean Daton can host camps of his own and get paid without worrying about NCAA ramifications?This is gonna get interesting. Way bigger than wrestling obviously.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports...s-profit-names-images-likenesses?platform=amp