This will change the game somewhat. The possibility of Titan Mercury and Sunkist etc, marketing the college athletes likeness? Daton and other elite athletes will be able to get paid while
In school. Not really a wrestling rule, but it will effect the elite guys.
here's a question.. once athletes can get paid for their likeness, what happens to sites like flo that profit of showing college athletes that up to this point can't get paid?
Really solid post on themat right now involving something I've thought about lately. How many RTCs currently employ more than one legit senior level athlete? It seems like outside of 2, maybe 3, schools the model just isn't sustainable over any real stretch of time.
I stopped reading themat forum years ago, so I probably don't understand the premise.
But in general, I think the RTC model is quite sustainable provided it doesn't get blown up by the NCAA one day. Plenty of RTCs have more than 1 legit senior level athlete - even we do.
I should have been more clear. I'm talking places that have multiple senior-level athletes who are, for the most part, funded through the RTC. I have a hard time thinking of more than Iowa and Penn State. Ohio State might still have Martin and Nato so they probably count also. We have Ringer but we barely have an RTC so I can't imagine we are funneling a decent chunk of change to White through our RTC.
My main point is that I bet there aren't as many well funded, sustainable RTCs out there as we think. They just market themselves a lot better than we do.
End of the day, whether you want to call it an RTC, wrestling club or whatever I do think we have built a really solid wrestling room where a kid can train with top talent at every weight range. It is just not labeled or marketed as an RTC.
@Air_Thurman, reading this again I think our posts probably crossed. When I initially read your post, it didn't have Martin & NATO listed. I guess you edited it and added them later, plus the 2nd & 3rd paragraphs. When I replied, I wasn't sarcastically repeating their names just so you know.
I agree we have a good room, but IMO we need to work on our message & our marketing. I few months ago, Matt Dernlan said (on Ben Askren's podcast) that John hates RTCs and John thinks it's bad for guys to be making big $. His reasoning was that John believes guys lose their competitive edge once they start making $. That's not one of the Flo Stooges saying it, Dernlan is a former D1 head coach. If he's saying that publicly, what do you think opposing coaches are saying to recruits in private?