Yep, that's it. That's exactly it. Brilliant take.Religious Right: <lobbies for miscegenation laws>
Wealthy, mostly white lefties: "It is racist to compare black people to apes"
Medic: "ahh, full circle"
Yep, that's it. That's exactly it. Brilliant take.Religious Right: <lobbies for miscegenation laws>
Wealthy, mostly white lefties: "It is racist to compare black people to apes"
Medic: "ahh, full circle"
You really can't figure this one out, or just playing dumb?
Sure he can. Take "white privilege" for example. The left tells us that "white privilege" is the enormous elephant in the room concerning all things not white and pilt's best answer for combating it is to "avoid contributing to the problem." Very forward thinking. I'm not sure why so many of us had not previously thought of that truly progressive idea prior to the recognition of "white privilege" by the left.You get down to the actual rules/parameters and you can’t define what’s ok.
Okay, actually dumb, not just playing dumb. Fair enough.That’s what always happens with you people. You get down to the actual rules/parameters and you can’t define what’s ok.
I had to rise to the occasion when replying to your equally brilliant take.Yep, that's it. That's exactly it. Brilliant take.
You bring up white privilege more than anyone else on this board.Sure he can. Take "white privilege" for example. The left tells us that "white privilege" is the enormous elephant in the room concerning all things not white and pilt's best answer for combating it is to "avoid contributing to the problem." Very forward thinking. I'm not sure why so many of us had not previously thought of that truly progressive idea prior to the recognition of "white privilege" by the left.
Because it's an enormous elephant that we should all be working diligently to solve. Or is it really not that big of a deal?You bring up white privilege more than anyone else on this board.
Yep. There's zero comparison to be made about the current left and the religious right. Progressives are an incredibly tolerant bunch.I had to rise to the occasion when replying to your equally brilliant take.
Yes it is a ridiculous comparison as illustrated above.Yep. There's zero comparison to be made about the current left and the religious right. Progressives are an incredibly tolerant bunch.
I have already told you that it is not my preferred way to speak about the issue because it automatically puts idiots on the defensive.Because it's an enormous elephant that we should all be working diligently to solve. Or is it really not that big of a deal?
I agree that your comparison was ridiculous. Where was I making a similar comparison?Yes it is a ridiculous comparison as illustrated above.
Why would you be defensive? It's either an issue worthy of considerable conversation and the sharing of ideas or it isn't.I have already told you that it is not my preferred way to speak about the issue because it automatically puts idiots on the defensive.
I agree that your comparison was ridiculous. Where was I making a similar comparison?
They have become what the religious right once was. Weird to see that circle completed.
The inequality of life between races in America is an issue worthy of considerable conversation, but addressing the issue as "white privilege" puts idiots on the defensive.Why would you be defensive? It's either an issue worthy of considerable conversation and the sharing of ideas or it isn't.
Again, why would you be defensive? I didn't come up with "white privilege" and I'm certainly not married to the term. I use it because it's what the left end of the political spectrum commonly calls it.The inequality of life between races in America is an issue worthy of considerable conversation, but addressing the issue as "white privilege" puts idiots on the defensive.
Oh so the part I quoted isn't true?Hmmmm. What was my initial post actually referencing? You intentionally left part of it out.
What is the rest of the post? There's this thing called context.Oh so the part I quoted isn't true?
Again, why would you be defensive? I didn't come up with "white privilege" and I'm certainly not married to the term. I use it because it's what the left end of the political spectrum commonly calls it.
It is just a page back, you can't remember it?What is the rest of the post? There's this thing called context.
Of course I can. I'm not the one quoting part of it and trying to change the context of the entire post.It is just a page back, you can't remember it?
So I came up with the term "white privilege?" Or the left doesn't commonly use the term? Or maybe both? What exactly are you disputing?
If it used commonly on the left then you should have plenty of opportunities to go argue with people who actually bring it up.So I came up with the term "white privilege?" Or the left doesn't commonly use the term? Or maybe both? What exactly are you disputing?
Feel free to state your case.Of course I can. I'm not the one quoting part of it and trying to change the context of the entire post.
The inequality of life between races in America is an issue worthy of considerable conversation, but addressing the issue as "white privilege" puts idiots on the defensive.
Laughing at you BradYou bleat about this frequently yet never produce metrics.
It's so easy you can google it yourselfMetrics Pilt
Not a tall task.
Knowingly uninformed poster. Noted.
Plenty of facts out there.
What other issues afflict you in addition to ignorance?
Huh? You just said that it was a topic worthy of considerable conversation. Are the semantics of what it's called really more important to you?If it used commonly on the left then you should have plenty of opportunities to go argue with people who actually bring it up.
YesHuh? You just said that it was a topic worthy of considerable conversation. Are the semantics of what it's called really more important to you?
The inequality of life between races in America is an issue worthy of considerable conversation, but addressing the issue as "white privilege" puts idiots on the defensive.
If you actually cared you'd make an effort at metrics, establishing a benchmark from which conversation can spring forth.
Not a tall task.
I highly doubt you truly care. You just like a good mace or warhammer, ambiguously defined but emotionally charged enough to be somewhat effective in dumb circles.
Knowingly uninformed poster. Noted.
Plenty of facts out there.
What other issues afflict you in addition to ignorance?
Brad If you actually loved your mom you'd spend the rest of the day banging your head against the wall.Convincing.
Your care and conviction shines.