When did Right leaners become pussified?
- Thread starter CBradSmith
- Start date
So it's just the extreme ones that treat women like dogs? I'm sure the ladies of Saudi Arabia will agree with you.
Funny how cozy this administration is with Saudi Arabia isn’t it? You make this child’s play haha
Divorced Saudi women now can win custody of their children. Saudi women are now allowed to join to military in non-combat roles.
Weird, how progressive ideology works - even in the dreaded Islamic world.
That was one of CS' more stupid comments of the past week. And that is saying something.
This is a Pilt I can have a beer with. Let's get this version of you, me, the non-drama queen version of @syskatine , the lucid @CSCOTTOSUPOKES , and the in-town/nonpreachy @davidallen all together and smoke a bowl.
Throw in @HighStickHarry @ThorOdinson13 @MegaPoke @Medic007 @windriverrange @Alpha Poke @CowboyJD @AC2017 @tlwwake @HanAholeSolo2.0 @purkey @NZ Poke @Headhunter @osu_orangestreak @Marshal Jim Duncan @BIGOSUFAN @DrunkenViking @GunsOfFrankEaton @Bitter Creek to get it mixed up.
Not a party without @long-duc-dong and @CowboyUp
Yeah, those Saudi women are free as hell now. Great job getting it done left team!
Oh I wholeheartedly agree. I'm surrounded by leftist racists in this environment that can't admit it to themselves because it would make their brain hurt. Group think FTW!
Saudi Arabia is in a state of extreme flux. It's promising. @Medic007 's point is not without recent merit.
You repeat yourself, sir.
In seriousness though, the classic liberal approach is to condemn bad actions not bad beliefs.
really? you think he gets woodshedded every day? is that literally your take of what happens on this board?
Yup, and the deflection and ad hominem ensues. Take Medic as a prime example.
This is a Pilt I can have a beer with. Let's get this version of you, me, the non-drama queen version of @syskatine , the lucid @CSCOTTOSUPOKES , and the in-town/nonpreachy @davidallen all together and smoke a bowl.
Throw in @HighStickHarry @ThorOdinson13 @MegaPoke @Medic007 @windriverrange @Alpha Poke @CowboyJD @AC2017 @tlwwake @HanAholeSolo2.0 @purkey @NZ Poke @Headhunter @osu_orangestreak @Marshal Jim Duncan @BIGOSUFAN @DrunkenViking @GunsOfFrankEaton @Bitter Creek to get it mixed up.
Not a party without @long-duc-dong and @CowboyUp
I'm in
You literally called yourself a racist...
“nobody in their right mind sees londanistan as anything but a reference to unchecked refugee (a highly debatable term) flood turning one of Western culture's greatest cities into a violent shithole - which in no way demeans the race of anyone. is it insensitive? yes, so f'ing what?”
And yes, it does demean races haha.
Keep it up, I love this.
“nobody in their right mind sees londanistan as anything but a reference to unchecked refugee (a highly debatable term) flood turning one of Western culture's greatest cities into a violent shithole - which in no way demeans the race of anyone. is it insensitive? yes, so f'ing what?”
And yes, it does demean races haha.
Keep it up, I love this.
these are the quotes that came to mind.
you are right, it was more of an implication - not surprised that I would defend "intolerant overt racism" because.... why?
you are correct - i misread. this was an ad hominem character assassination of @windriverrange rather than me.
no, potato. it most definitely does not. no race is specified. in fact its quite unintentionally racist of you to assume homogenous racial characteristics in this case.
what "race" are citizens of Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan? the stans all borrow from a persian word meaning "land" and are more asian than arabian, north african etc. so
the inference is that londonistan is becoming a third world shithole country. you still cannot define the race being attacked - only that it's insensitive which it damned well should be.
Dodge? Find a mirror... Simple request. Respect for saying "I have no or choose not to answer" - dodging not so much...
When you have to resort to changing a Breitbart headline into something even more racist, yeah, it’s true. Deal with it.
Has to make a diatribe defending himself as a non-racist, doing awful job at it. Lol...oh boy.
So bad actions can't come from bad beliefs? That's interesting. I condemn both the actions and beliefs of white supremacists. I can't possibly be a classical liberal because of that?
I don't think a classical liberal would condemn a white supremacist who didn't act on his/her beliefs.
Well I'm sorry. I guess I'm not pure enough. What do you suggest I call my political beliefs?
BTW, I probably wouldn't know someone was a white supremacist if they weren't acting on their beliefs. Weird how that works.
Give me a quick rundown of your most closely held beliefs besides Muslims and white supremacists are bad?
Where did I say Muslims are bad? You'd be factually correct if you posted that I believe Islam is a very oppressive religion.
If your position is just that the Islamic religion is very oppressive, then you are still eligible for classic liberalism.
The Islamic religion is very oppressive when practiced in the strict interpretation. Not all Muslims are oppressive or oppressed.
Ever hear of that thing that was called the Reformation?
I guess I'm not aware that Christians prohibit women from leaving their house without a familial male escort, require women to be completely covered, commit honor killings of the victims of rape, and execute people who decide to leave the religion. Where are these things occurring in Christian populations? The US? England? Canada?
Similar threads
