It's a matter of politically moral perspective. The counter to your moral perspective is every human being owns his or her own body. It comes down to the concept that the owner gets to do what he or she chooses to do with the "property." You use that argument, for example, when you beseech people to not take the Covid vaccine. Gabbard, like myself, agrees with the "ownership" argument, is adamantly opposed to abortion but recognizes the body in question is not ours to deal with, a woman gets to choose what happens to her body because she owns it. We will do our best to persuade a woman to consider all the alternatives, but it is morally wrong for us to decide what happens to her body without her consent and use the police power of the state to enforce our will on her. This is not an "evil" argument, even though I'm sure you think it is. It's an argument in favor of the sovereignty of the individual, the choice in favor of liberty. I know I may as well be saying this to a brick wall, but maybe someone else will understand the point being made.
