Couldn’t agree with this more. Trump has evolved and taken the MAGA crowd with him, and they (you?) still think you’re rebels.
Draining The Swamp
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
Now you’re being chickenshit. You’re also revealing yourself to be a condescending prick who talks at people rather than speaks with them. I answered your question, and you’ve dodged mine. F.uck you. 🖕🏻
I offer my opinions on a daily basis. You’re scraping the bottom of the “insult barrel” if that’s the best you’ve got. The questions asked of you in this thread are legitimate and non-threatening to any MAGA (@Tulsaaggieson for example) who has given 5 seconds of thought about what “draining the swamp” means. Unfortunately most of you haven’t given it *any* thought. You just like the way it sounds, and since DJT says it over and over (without explanation) you lap it up like it’s deep thought. Only one responder has offered up an opinion. The rest of you are scrambling to make the thread about me so you can avoid showing how little thought you’ve given the subject. Hell, one of you is so distraught he said he wasn’t interested in draining the swamp at all!
I answered your question in a new thread where it belongs. You have dutifully failed to address my question, and for that reason you deserve to be treated in a condescending manner,
I answered your question. If Trump hadn’t accomplished one single thing that he promised, I’d still be infinitely happier with him in office than some traitorous, marxist democrook. Threads are supposed to be conversations, not lectures, now answer my question, you f.ucking coward.
You answered the question you wanted to answer, not the one(s) I asked. When you avoid the topic it’s hard to have a conversation about the topic. Your question is an obvious attempt to deflect so you won’t have to participate in the subject. And I answered it in a thread I started specifically to answer in an appropriate venue.
Are you capable of a real answer or are you truly just an old sad troll?
Actually, I've answered the question about how I would drain the swamp if I was president probably 5 times on this board before. Feel free to go back and look it up, but it involves relocating every executive department to a different state in the union.
As for my expectation with Trump, I have none. I don't want him as my president. I just Don't want the other guy even more, so I'm happy to support Trump. But I don't expect him to drain the swamp. I do expect to see a major elimination of 'civil servants' currently in the highest positions of these departments. But the thing I want to see most, and I'm frankly at least hopeful we'll see it under Trump and I know it won't happen under Biden, is at least the beginning of reining in our deficit spending. I'd like to see it back under $1T/yr by the end of Trump's next term. That would be a win. I'd like to see him gut the EPA's war on fossil fuels in order to drive inflation down.
Those are the things I want to see from the next president, and there's only one candidate that has any interest in at least attempting those things.
Sure, I’ll be happy to do that. Pick a topic of discussion on this board from the last six months to a year in which you are puzzled what I think about it and I’ll see if I can clarify it for you.
How about an answer regarding how pacifism works for a country that's slightly deeper than a platitude about porcupines.
Well let’s start by explaining “pacifism” and “non-interventionism” are not the same thing. A non-interventionist society has no qualms about defending itself if it is attacked. Any attack against it would be an *unprovoked* attack because it does not interfere in the affairs of others. It would be more than capable of repelling an attack and it would make it very clear to any potential attacker that he would lose badly. A pacifist society is more likely to not defend itself, more of a Jesus “turn the other cheek” point of view. Is that deep enough for you?
Similar threads
