ADVERTISEMENT

To Indict or not to Indict...

I realize most people likely don't read every post on this board. But you apparently missed what precipitated the gender comments many months ago. To sum, there is a certain poster who wants Hillary to be elected solely because, well gosh darn it, it's time to have a woman president.

To select a presidential candidate on the basis of genitalia is worthy of continued highlighting, in our opinion.

Oh, and her ass is really huge. Just an observation.
War on mediocre white men?
Nut up. Femphobes...,,,

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anna-...-opposite-of-imposter-syndrome_b_9553190.html
 
Last edited:
It's called satire. Her only appeal is the novelty of her gender, which is pathetic.
You know better than that... Look up "satire". Misunderstood almost as much as "ironic". If you can somehow relate the size of Clintons ankles to some weakness, vice, or intellectual deficiency then I will owe you an apology.... If not, just admit you get a giggle out of teasing fat kids and we can all move on.
 
She's also got cankles, Teletubby pantsuits, AND AN FBI INVESTIGATION going against her. Damn those folks who focus on her vaghag appearance. Should they focus on her criminal investigation instead?

Mr. Allen?
I have no problem focusing on issues of substance - you actually do your position a disservice with this crap as it is very easy to dismiss your points by simply focusing on the ad hominem. But I guess if that is all you got, then go ahead with it....
 
You know better than that... Look up "satire". Misunderstood almost as much as "ironic". If you can somehow relate the size of Clintons ankles to some weakness, vice, or intellectual deficiency then I will owe you an apology.... If not, just admit you get a giggle out of teasing fat kids and we can all move on.

Don't be dumb.

People are sick of superficial reasons (race and gender) being happily cited as reasons to vote for leadership. And they are equally sick of hypersensitive pussies crying about every perceived instance of sexism, racism etc ad nauseum. So they respond with obvious exaggerations of intentionally over the top sexist objectification when confronted with pathetic fanboy drooling over a criminal whose only qualification is her gender.

It's obvious satire and you would have to be a moron to misunderstand it. you aren't a moron. Do better.
 
You know better than that... Look up "satire". Misunderstood almost as much as "ironic". If you can somehow relate the size of Clintons ankles to some weakness, vice, or intellectual deficiency then I will owe you an apology.... If not, just admit you get a giggle out of teasing fat kids and we can all move on.


sat·ire
ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/
noun
  1. the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.




    Yeah... Turns out I used it right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: poke2001
HRC appeal is she's tougher than Bob wire. Can't wait for general to see how bad she kicks Donald's ass
 
So Mega, relate her "stupidity or vices" to the size of her ankles. I guess I am just dense and don't see the irony in that...
 
I have no problem focusing on issues of substance - you actually do your position a disservice with this crap as it is very easy to dismiss your points by simply focusing on the ad hominem. But I guess if that is all you got, then go ahead with it....
It's all the game he's got
 
This board is replete with sexist femphobes 1000 posts per month.
But somehow that's not trolling
This whole board is one yuuuuge right wing HRC sexist bashing circle jerk cluster troll
 
This board is replete with sexist femphobes 1000 posts per month.
But somehow that's not trolling
This whole board is a right wing HRC sexist bashing cluster troll
Dude, you are so clearly just egging them on... and helping them live up to the stereotype.
 
CUP - there is legitimacy to the position that there is resentment of the POTUS because of his race. That HRC is criticized for shit that has nothing to do with her qualifications for office.

Your approach here does nothing but superficially seek to reinforce those points. I would much rather see a real discussion of the issues. This thread starts with a reference to an Opinion piece in the NY Post. The author has a clear agenda and bias. Plenty of things to mention discrediting the substance of the article if one chooses to. But alas, same old shit.

Like you I am pretty much outnumbered here. The social liberal agenda gets little to no support, but I think you would do much better to engage at a more intellectual level. To each their own...
 
  • Like
Reactions: poke2001
CUP - there is legitimacy to the position that there is resentment of the POTUS because of his race. That HRC is criticized for shit that has nothing to do with her qualifications for office.

Your approach here does nothing but superficially seek to reinforce those points. I would much rather see a real discussion of the issues. This thread starts with a reference to an Opinion piece in the NY Post. The author has a clear agenda and bias. Plenty of things to mention discrediting the substance of the article if one chooses to. But alas, same old shit.

Like you I am pretty much outnumbered here. The social liberal agenda gets little to no support, but I think you would do much better to engage at a more intellectual level. To each their own...
He can't, not with HRC anyway. Plus, this board isn't all that socially conservative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Okay, so mocking Hillary makes us misogynistic neanderthals. Focus on her qualifications, okay.

I want you to tell me her accomplishments, legislative record, tell me about those. Her big achievements as Secretary of State, let me see those.

Let me save you some typing, being married to the President and traveling on a plane around the world are not accomplishments unless your goal is to see how well you can marry and how many miles you can travel without accomplishing anything.

I'll be waiting, let's have all the substance that makes Hillary such a great candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I want you to tell me her accomplishments, legislative record, tell me about those. Her big achievements as Secretary of State, let me see those.
She has given a quid pro quo future repayment to wealthy donors to her foundation. She has treasonously exposed several of our nation's most secret details to foreign governments. She and her cohorts have deliberately violated numerous prohibitions on dealing with said secrets and deleted evidence thereto. She failed to preserve and destroyed documents belonging to the government of the US. She lied about the deaths of four brave citizens and the video which caused those deaths. And she barks like a dog.
 
Almost the entirety of the 3rd page is this thread reeks with irony and "know better." Comical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I've tangled with bob wire before. He is sharp and will stick it to you if given the chance. I could roll him up if I wanted but he is good at keeping the cattle on my property so I put up with him.

I prefer Barb wire. Pre hepatitis era Pam Anderson at her jigglyest. I'll post pics later so we can all mercifully stop visualizing Hilary's sturdy leathery countenance in this thread.
 
People are sick of superficial reasons (race and gender) being happily cited as reasons to vote for leadership. And they are equally sick of hypersensitive pussies crying about every perceived instance of sexism, racism etc ad nauseum. So they respond with obvious exaggerations of intentionally over the top sexist objectification when confronted with pathetic fanboy drooling over a criminal whose only qualification is her gender.
THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
@CowboyUp I got your Barb Wire right here. Now quit talking about Hlidahound Mcfatass. She's gross, OK?

gif15-pamela-anderson.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I have no problem focusing on issues of substance - you actually do your position a disservice with this crap as it is very easy to dismiss your points by simply focusing on the ad hominem. But I guess if that is all you got, then go ahead with it....
Obviously you and CCup are miles apart in your intellect, knowledge, and ability to think independently, at least as observed on this board. I'd have discussions with you all day. I believe we've had several good ones here. CCup doesn't deserve any substance since he has none himself. I bomb his idiotic threads and posts for entertainment.
 
Her supporters don't care. True.
BC: I have a hard time getting overly excited about them at this point.

I have no doubt that the intent was to hide the mix of foundation and official business that was be going on. I am surprised at how aware "Mahogany Row" was of this server and that no one had the fortitude to escalate the issue - it took Benghazi to bring this to the surface.

Perhaps dumb luck but we would know by now if there was a compromise of the server. She was stupid, and wrong, to reuse Bills server because she couldn't be bothered with security. She does not have my support, though at some point I will have to figure out who gets my vote - worst set of candidates I can recall (and I partly remember my parents talking Nixon v. McGovern).
 
worst set of candidates I can recall (and I partly remember my parents talking Nixon v. McGovern).
Very much agree. In my vast imagination, how awesome would it be for nobody to vote and then demand the parties put out somebody for the people, not the retreads, weirdos, and extremists they've trotted out this go round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitter Creek
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT