Lol. Nice try. You're a pure leftist fanboy. You can try to deny it, but your own posts will call you a liar. It is what it is.
"I am the opposite of a fanboy-I despise DJT."
Says the fanboy.
Lol.
Carry on.
That's it?
- Thread starter davidallen
- Start date
"I am the opposite of a fanboy-I despise DJT."
Says the fanboy.
Lol.
Carry on.
Hmmm, concerned about the 85% YOY increase in government borrowing is a leftist position now - weird, I get called a fiscal moderate/conservative by some for that.
My bad, sir. I haven't seen you complain about borrowing. I'll amend my observation and drop the "pure" part of it.
Lol...so it’s irrelevant until a leftist brings it up. Heaven forbid a Trumpet called out a flawed budget direction.
Carry on.
Huh? That makes no sense. Did you reply to the wrong post, in the wrong thread, or is that just some chimpanzee keyboard work? You'll have to help me out here.
OK, so why all the grandstanding by the Democrats and all the BULLSHIT about sources and methods being revealed that would do irreparable harm to national security/counter-intelligence?
I didn't see any sources or methods in it or an reason for outrage over the memo -- Schiff was right that it was selective and just a shot at the FBI to get Mueller fired.
Carry on pearl clutching over the BULLSHIT of the memo, but not the actual silly shit Nunes repeatedly does. That doesn't bother you at all, does it?
"Pearl clutching" was clearly in the latest blast you got from HQ. However, you could at least try to form a sentence that makes sense.
Here toon, here boy....listen up...we have your talking points. Be a good boy, be compliant.
Lighten up, Alf. You're a little edgy today. Things are never as good or as bad as they seem.
Lighten up, Alf. You're a little edgy today. Things are never as good or as bad as they seem.
What offended your delicate sensibilities?
Just trying to to help you w the anxiety. Provide some levity. You seem wound even tighter than usual.
You're lying.
You do so (much more frequently in the last 12 months) to give yourself protection from your cognitive dissonance.
Because leftists rely more on emotion in a relatively larger capacity when compared to right leaners, cognitive dissonance is actually more painful for you than right leaners.
That's why you, and other leftists, are avoiding it. It's why you've been backed into a dangerous corner by your leftist overlords (we see this in spades now that documentation of reality is circulating), and it's why, generally speaking, you are unhappier in life. (Because you avoid dissonance, instead of 'dealing with reality,' you are in a perpetual state of catching up maturity-wise)
Project much? I haven't even called you a moron and it's not like you haven't been presenting.
I'm guessing it's getting harder to not see your own bullshit.
That has to be tough. We're here for you buddy.
You know what this bitchy female energy of yours does to me. Like catnip. I have to touch that crazy flame, you little freak. Come sit on my lap.
Willing to bet those worried about sources and methods hadn't read it.
Includes me, BTW. Seems a reasonable concern... Same requirements for rebuttal memo.
I'll bet you love Devin Nunes. He's the kind of dull chickenshit that you'd find inspiring.
He ran a train on little Schiffler and the rest of the Dim Screech Squad. But but but National Security! Wuh, wuh, wuh Weeeeee want to release a memo toooooooo! Classic play and the Trumpanzees fell flat on their face.
Now little Schiffy is Charlie Brown charging the football. We all know how that one ends.
They claimed they had. And that concern also originally was floated by the FBI itself.
My expectation is the Schiffe memo carries about as much weight as the Nunes memo. Now that is behind us we can get back to the real show... dance Monkey dance!
Trumpanzee Dimocrats Unite!
Did I get the verbiage of the talking points correct? Maybe I need more emphasis on the shit flinging anti-Trump chimps? Any help from the lefty jizz dumps here?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph..._term=.ce85af658ff1&__twitter_impression=true
Lol, pearls.
Carry on.
Lol, pearls.
Carry on.
Upon publication of the Nunes memo, a retired federal judge emailed me:
"There is not an officer of the court in the land who in the context of this particular application to the FISA court should not have identified the source of the information as having been the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton Campaign. If I had granted the application and then subsequently learned that the information was sourced to the DNC and the Campaign, I would have rescinded the authorization and issued a show-cause order to the Government to explain who and why this sourcing was not made known to the court.
the fisa court failed to thin slice this application because of a "trust" with the DOJ and FBI?
that's dangerous
$#*&ing Republican appointees...... I swear you have to watch them at every. single. turn.
what am i missing?
1. trump says off color stuff in the back of a limo
1a snowflakes gather with torches and pitchforks and rightfully choose not to vote for said candidate
1b however what trump said would not
remotely call for a surveillance warrant
2. political party funds salacious material to generate surveillance warrant on opposing candidate violating the very tenants of our democracy
2a zero visceral snow puff reaction
1. trump says off color stuff in the back of a limo
1a snowflakes gather with torches and pitchforks and rightfully choose not to vote for said candidate
1b however what trump said would not
remotely call for a surveillance warrant
2. political party funds salacious material to generate surveillance warrant on opposing candidate violating the very tenants of our democracy
2a zero visceral snow puff reaction
as if on cue snow starts falling
i don't care what GD party was appointed to make this ruling
i do care what party employs tactics in violation of the constitution
Similar threads
