I know for certain that Trump is not a marxist tyrant, and the only people who profess to have anything to fear from Trump are people who I would prefer not to have around anyway. I think the country would be far better off without them. I guess you could say that I'm "for" their absence from the USA.Two points I would make in response:
1). I assume from your reply you are conceding that I understand the Trump supporter better than you thought.
2). It is not enough in politics or the administration of government to support someone only for what he is against. It is crucial that one knows what is being advocated, not just opposed.
For example:
The Chinese were against Chiang Kai-Shek, and welcomed Mao with open arms. They had not bothered to understand what he was for.
The Russians thought they had had their fill with the Czar. They had not bothered to understand what Lenin and Associates stood for.
The Cubans thought Bautista was a brutal dictator (they were right about that), and so they supported the guy who was against him. Little did they realize they were trading tyranny for more tyranny.
The point is it is not enough to support someone because of what he tells you he’s against. If you support him you should know what he’s for. I do not think the majority of Trump supporters could tell us what he was for, only what he was against. I’m not suggesting Trump would become a maniacal murderer of his own people. I’m am suggesting that’s how a surprising number of maniacal killers come to power. Our Founding Fathers advised us to be ever vigilant. I think vigilance/protecting our liberty has fallen way down the list of priorities for too many Americans, mainly those on the left, but the Trump faithful are a little lax in that regard as well.