ADVERTISEMENT

New chant at Trump rally... "Send her back" ...lol

So you decide to live in a country and area of the world filled with racists, homophobes and religious bigots.
Sorry no racists yes some bigots unfortunately we don't allow same sex marriage but majority of the country is not homophobic.
 
america-love-it-or-leave-it.jpg
 
Believe me I am very happy that I left because I wouldn't be able to cope with a racist
President in a country that I had decided to migrate to.

I don’t believe you. That’s asinine.

It’s obvious to me that leftists have a mental disorder.

In one sentence they say trump supporters are the minority because hillary won the popular vote. Then they say America is racist.

Surely there are leftist places in this country that you would live in? You don’t have to interact with all 350 million people you know that right? Why would you not live in San Fran or LA or Seattle or Gary Indiana? You can have as many non racist minorities as you want in some neighborhoods. Explain that childlike contradiction to me.


You would be right at home in the four districts represented by the brat pack squad, correct?
 
To me skin complexion is not a race.
All europeans are of not the same race, nor are africans are of the same race same goes for asians south americans and australians.
There is only one race in this world they are called humans.
Trump supporters can disagree with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
To me skin complexion is not a race.
All europeans are of not the same race, nor are africans are of the same race same goes for asians south americans and australians.
There is only one race in this world they are called humans.
Trump supporters can disagree with that.

You are a lost cause. You can’t possibly believe that trump supporters are the ones dividing people by skin color. Please watch msnbc and the joe Reid show. Watch how she only deals on monolithic statements about blacks and whites. Our universities are obsessed. Osu just won an award for diverse graduating class. Based on what? Skin complexion. A brown from Edmond marks the same box as a brown from Nigeria and the same box as one from Harlem. It’s a ridiculous skin based system created by and created for leftist idiots to feel better about their race guilt.
 
To me skin complexion is not a race.
All europeans are of not the same race, nor are africans are of the same race same goes for asians south americans and australians.
There is only one race in this world they are called humans.
Trump supporters can disagree with that.
Remove your Ostrich head from the sand. This post is about as moronic as I've read on this forum and that says much. Anything credible you've ever said just got tossed to the ash heap of idiocy.
 
To me skin complexion is not a race.
All europeans are of not the same race, nor are africans are of the same race same goes for asians south americans and australians.
There is only one race in this world they are called humans.
Trump supporters can disagree with that.

Why don’t you address what I said about all of the places to live here where you can live in harmony with other leftists? How does trump disturb your friends in San Francisco?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
You are a lost cause. You can’t possibly believe that trump supporters are the ones dividing people by skin color. Please watch msnbc and the joe Reid show. Watch how she only deals on monolithic statements about blacks and whites. Our universities are obsessed. Osu just won an award for diverse graduating class. Based on what? Skin complexion. A brown from Edmond marks the same box as a brown from Nigeria and the same box as one from Harlem. It’s a ridiculous skin based system created by and created for leftist idiots to feel better about their race guilt.
Complexion of the skin is not an issue created by the leftist ( I don't consider myself a leftist ) it was created during slavery and went to extreme by hitler who cannot be called a leftist. I knew Trump supporters would be very upset by my post and I was right.
 
Complexion of the skin is not an issue created by the leftist ( I don't consider myself a leftist ) it was created during slavery and went to extreme by hitler who cannot be called a leftist. I knew Trump supporters would be very upset by my post and I was right.


Wrong wrong wrong. Skin color hatred and xenophobia have existed since there were more than one human like species. Over time we have tried to get away from that. Now it’s front and center because race hustlers and the media know through big data that’s profitable.

You have zero clue ali. I hope you learn something in your time on this board, but it’s clear you are just here to rub feces all over the wall and call it art.
 
Wrong wrong wrong. Skin color hatred and xenophobia have existed since there were more than one human like species. Over time we have tried to get away from that. Now it’s front and center because race hustlers and the media know through big data that’s profitable.

You have zero clue ali. I hope you learn something in your time on this board, but it’s clear you are just here to rub feces all over the wall and call it art.
Yes I was wrong I should have gone further into the history..
Complexion of the skin did not become an issue till european colonization.
That makes you happy
 
Yes I was wrong I should have gone further into the history..
Complexion of the skin did not become an issue till european colonization.
That makes you happy


No it makes me sad. Skin color xenophobia is no different than language and location xenophobia. It’s as old as time. Europeans had European slaves. Africans had african slaves. What about Egyptians having Jewish slaves? Was that skin color? Slightly before European colonization.
 
No it makes me sad. Skin color xenophobia is no different than language and location xenophobia. It’s as old as time. Europeans had European slaves. Africans had african slaves. What about Egyptians having Jewish slaves? Was that skin color? Slightly before European colonization.
Slavery is totally different issue from complexion of skin.
Countries have enslaved their own people.
But skin color did not become an issue before european colonization.
Read the history.
 
Slavery is totally different issue from complexion of skin.
Countries have enslaved their own people.
But skin color did not become an issue before european colonization.
Read the history.

So skin color wasn’t an issue to The Romans and Greeks?
 
No it wasn't, their issues was conquering the world. I have never read while reading about Alexander the great where he described people by their skin color.
Infact his army had people of all colors,
 
So skin color wasn’t an issue to The Romans and Greeks?

From what I’ve read, not really. At least internally. Cultures were so homogenized and languages so varied, even if you were 50 miles away from home, and most didn’t have the means to travel from their 20 square mile bubble, that they didn’t have any sense of race, since you could go your whole life without seeing people who weren’t the same color as you. Not until exploration (or colonization) we’re races thrust together and did skin color become an easily identifiable distinguisher.
 
Trump invokes KKK slogan 'love it or leave it' at North Carolina rally
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/trump-invokes-kkk-slogan-love-it-or-leave-it-at-north-carolina-rally
At a rally in North Carolina, US President Donald Trump doubled down on his attacks against four Democratic congresswomen and appeared to invoke a slogan used by white nationalists telling them to 'love it or leave it'.

UPDATEDUPDATED 6 HOURS AGO
BY RASHIDA YOSUFZAI
SHARE
“If they don’t love it, tell them to leave it" - that was US President Donald Trump’s message about four Democratic congresswomen at a rally in North Carolina, where supporters called for one of four female politicians - who was born overseas - to be “sent back”.

“Let ’em leave,” Mr Trump said of the four women. “They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

But the ‘love it or leave it’ line is an eerily familiar slogan of the Klu Klux Klan in North Carolina, according to Australian National University US politics expert Jennifer Hunt.


Dr Hunt, who grew up in North Carolina, said the “Love it or Leave it” slogan was used by the KKK years ago when it claimed to be fighting “communism and integration”.



38932c6e-a81a-4d13-978f-837d427ebf46

A billboard in North Carolina circa 1970s
The 1972 Howler yearbook at Wake Forest via Winston Salem Journal


“I remember seeing signs as a child, ‘Welcome to Klan country … love it or leave it,” she told SBS News.

“Many of those good people didn’t leave North Carolina, they worked to improve it. And the white nationalists who remained didn’t relinquish their degenerate slogans and ideas, just their decent place in society.

“But when they’re ushered back in, that threatens the safety of us all.”



READ MORE


Trump rally cheers over comments on 'the Squad'


Mr Trump’s rally cries came on the back of days of criticism after he told the four women to “go back” to their countries of origin, although three of them were born in America.

When Mr Trump made the “love it or leave it” remark, the crowd responded enthusiastically back shouting, “leave it!”



5fcb8277-db89-45e2-ad2f-69f464ad0458

A protester calls out as President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally.
AP

Dr Hunt said such language would undoubtedly embolden white nationalists.

“They’re being brought in from the cold after a whole generation of being cast out of polite society and now they’re’ feeling empowered," she said.

“They feed off these messages off the most important office holder on the planet so what he says matters and we should be holding him up to the highest standard.



READ MORE
1x1

"I'm a person of colour," says white US Congressman


But such language, in turn, could have significant real-life consequences, she added.

“We have white nationalists that are celebrating this president and saying he supports our message and ‘finally have our man in the White House’," she said.

“This is disconcerting, and, of course, what happens in North Carolina doesn’t stay in North Carolina - these messages will be broadcast nationally and they’ll be broadcast internationally.



READ MORE:
1x1

'Throw her out!': Trump rally erupts into chant about congresswoman Ilhan Omar


“And we see that white nationalist ideas when weaponised with violence are capable of brutal massacres in churches, mosques and synagogues.”

At the rally, Mr Trump doubled down on his attacks against the four congresswomen to enthusiastic supporters who chanted, “Send her back! Send her back!” in reference to Ilhan Omar, who arrived in America as a child refugee.

Dr Hunt said ‘Send her back’ is likely to become the new ‘lock her up’ – the slogan used by Trump supporters in the lead up to the 2016 presidential election, when crowds attacked Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

Dr Hunt said the next election will likely be fought on the lines of race and immigration.

“This will be the new chant in place of ‘lock her up’ it will be ‘send her back’,” Dr Hunt said.

“And how Republicans and how the American public responds to that tells us less about Trump, more about ourselves.”
 
Lol!

What's wrong with deporting Communists?

You think Cuba would be in a better place today if they had deported Che and Fidel?

You are in favor of deporting American citizens because you disagree with their politics? That is unfathomable to me.
 
I think we are speaking past each other here. Is trump not commander and chief of a military of all races? The idea that people hated different groups and intermixing color with culture as to the motivation is silly. If what you are saying is true, then how has trump won awards from Jesse jackson and paid minority employees to work for him his whole life. He hates these four women for their words. That’s what the left cannot compute. They all thought the only thing that could possibly be wrong with hillary was her genitals. Everyone is sexist, when the ghost of Margaret thatcher would beat trump in a 2020 primary challenge.

Europeans disliked minorities because they weren’t Christian or civilized. Alexander the Great in his time the army was multi national, but to my knowledge it was still divided internally by where you came from and what kind of culture or race you were. Everyone in ancient times was suspicious of other groups. Religion, skin color, language, customs, etc. that didn’t change with Europeans.
 
I think we are speaking past each other here. Is trump not commander and chief of a military of all races? The idea that people hated different groups and intermixing color with culture as to the motivation is silly. If what you are saying is true, then how has trump won awards from Jesse jackson and paid minority employees to work for him his whole life. He hates these four women for their words. That’s what the left cannot compute. They all thought the only thing that could possibly be wrong with hillary was her genitals. Everyone is sexist, when the ghost of Margaret thatcher would beat trump in a 2020 primary challenge.

Europeans disliked minorities because they weren’t Christian or civilized. Alexander the Great in his time the army was multi national, but to my knowledge it was still divided internally by where you came from and what kind of culture or race you were. Everyone in ancient times was suspicious of other groups. Religion, skin color, language, customs, etc. that didn’t change with Europeans.
Please give me your definition of civilized.
The reason color became an issue was because they wanted to make the local population feel inferior. When the british came to India they came as traders hence
east india company. None of the local history of that time describe them as white.
Once they took over India suddenly Indians became colored people and inferior to the white man and this is as described in a book written by a british author of that time. You don't think they tried to convert people to christianity they used all the tools the could.Did they treat Indian christians as an equal now that is the question.
 
Please give me your definition of civilized.
The reason color became an issue was because they wanted to make the local population feel inferior. When the british came to India they came as traders hence
east india company. None of the local history of that time describe them as white.
Once they took over India suddenly Indians became colored people and inferior to the white man and this is as described in a book written by a british author of that time. You don't think they tried to convert people to christianity they used all the tools the could.Did they treat Indian christians as an equal now that is the question.

You would have to ask the European colonizers their definition of civilized. You will also have to show me all the early writings of Indians not commenting on the pale skin of the British. There’s no way that’s true.

I doubt the British treated anyone as equals back then. They thought their culture was more advanced and that’s why they treated India and the entire middle east like children and took advantage of their resources because there was nothing they could do about it.

Set me straight with some history Ali.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT