ADVERTISEMENT

National emergency

piss off cup
you’re on ignore now

pretty solid conversation taking place with a well meaning pakistani

and i get a pic of otard bin ladin showing off his missing forehead

Ignore This:

Washington Crossing the Delaware
Gettysburg
D Day
Cuban Missile Crisis
Execution of osama bin Laden
 
Sure it always depends on people who run these programs but are'nt most of them
Republicans.
No I did'nt sell bibles in Pakistan I would be crucified if I did that.I sold them in virginia
n carolina michigan indiana and alabama.
Your definition of patriot is fine and I understand then how do support a president
who said there were nice people on the nazi and kkk side during charleston protest.
I remember a dinner that I had with a family and I made a comment that because of hitler the colonization by europe finished and we got our freedom. The host got so upset that I had to apologize he was in world war 2 at the time of normandy landing.
How can you support a president who attacks the press and calls it fake news just like hitler did.
When I was in oklahoma there were only three news channels nbc,cbs and abc
and reublicans still won.

my friend putnam city north used to be
90% republican

it is 75% democrat now

when you bring up trump saying there are nice people on the nazi and kkk side you really have no idea how uneducated and brainwashed by the media you sound

i don’t mean to say that you are or make it personal it just sounds like media propaganda that has had its intended affect on people’s ignorance and willing to believe based on their fear and disgust of all things trump.

what is colloquially referred to as TDS or trump derangement syndrome

your comment on hitler is intellectually correct
but was a emotional napalm

on the 50th anniversary of nuking hiroshima i sat at my grandads table and his wife was upset when i said it’s something that shouldn’t be celebrated, i explained my position to the table and i understand both you and your hosts perspectives

again you wonder how i can support a president that attacks media as fake news?

shit that’s easy, did you watch andy mccabes softball interview on 60minutes?

watch this garbage as tho he’s a saudi mullah spreading radical islam to the ignorant of your country

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/andrew...tionship-between-trump-russia-prompted-probe/

mccabe was a willing participant in a bloodless coup in our country

what the first thing zia did upon dispatching bhutto?

took over the media and created a narrative
our media is liberal and controversy creates ratings

trump is the best thing that ever happened for their ratings and business model

don’t be fooled the media is not protector of our democracy any more than andy mccabe,

conflating trumps attacks on the media as hitleresque again sounds like you got media driven TDS

read the media firestorm
on the maga hatted catholic school kids
on jussie smollett

understand how much press those two incidents got and how emotionally captivated america was

reality is both incidents were contrived bullshit

you are way too educated and savvy for that crap

trump just bothers your feelers
 
Ignore This:

Washington Crossing the Delaware
Gettysburg
D Day
Cuban Missile Crisis
Execution of osama bin Laden

That's some high level fellatio right there.

"Presidency on the line"..... which school of drama did you attend?

You libs are so dramatic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
First of all I heard it myself so there is no question that Trump said it.
In one of my earlier post I mentioned that I met giulliani and his comments
on Donald Trump.The reason I got to meet some very interesting from both side of the divide is that my mother in law headed a UN department I met William Buckley in 93 or 94 the father of the conservative movement I also met Ted Turner and Jane Fonda ,I am telling you this is because of the difference in the type of personalities I came across. Most of the New Yorkers did not trust Trump.I hope he is the messiah that you think he is, I do'nt.
As far as the catholic school kids wearing MAGA hats and what happened was really not important,
news channels need stories some turn into opinions and others do'nt
I really did not pay that much attention because 17 year old kids do all sort of weird stuff
and what they do is not a political statement.
 
I didn't see the entire sixty minutes but I get the gist. Mcabe is a republican
and if he was able to remove Trump would have been because of other republicans
including the vice president. Where does the media bias comes in it was an interview.
 
First of all I heard it myself so there is no question that Trump said it.

He was referring to the civil war statues controversy. He wasn’t referring to the white nationalists. You seem smart enough to realize how stupid this claim is. And if you don’t care how stupid it is, at least take a moment to consider that the people you are engaging here are not uninformed enough to buy it.
 
He was referring to the civil war statues controversy. He wasn’t referring to the white nationalists. You seem smart enough to realize how stupid this claim is. And if you don’t care how stupid it is, at least take a moment to consider that the people you are engaging here are not uninformed enough to buy it.
Sure I am glad you think that.
 
First of all I heard it myself so there is no question that Trump said it.
In one of my earlier post I mentioned that I met giulliani and his comments
on Donald Trump.The reason I got to meet some very interesting from both side of the divide is that my mother in law headed a UN department I met William Buckley in 93 or 94 the father of the conservative movement I also met Ted Turner and Jane Fonda ,I am telling you this is because of the difference in the type of personalities I came across. Most of the New Yorkers did not trust Trump.I hope he is the messiah that you think he is, I do'nt.
As far as the catholic school kids wearing MAGA hats and what happened was really not important,
news channels need stories some turn into opinions and others do'nt
I really did not pay that much attention because 17 year old kids do all sort of weird stuff
and what they do is not a political statement.

now you getting all over the map

sure trump said there’s good people on both sides in referencing charlotsville nowhere did i argue he didn’t, but context is the ground on which his statement is made

and dismissing the maga hatred kids sure that’s great 17yr old kids do do stupid stuff

but in the process you dismiss the media’s role, the media that made the story, the media that forms your opinions for you

as for the people you’ve met, what a wonderful opportunity you have had to travel the world and gain perspective, but here’s the deal

i had a former politician in my restaurant

as a customer he was fantastic
as a politician he should have gone to jail
as a business person he screwed my friends dad out of hundreds of thousands
as a father my heart hurts for him

i don’t think of trump as infallible or a messiah

i know he didn’t pay his pollster
i know he runs around on his wife
i know he’s screwed a porn star

i also know he’s the most affective and effective president of my time who fights tooth and nail every day for my country
and by this conversation with you i couldn’t feel more positive about the job he’s doing
 
Where does the media bias comes in it was an interview.

full stop on the political conversation
there’s nothing i can do with this question

i’d love to hear more about pakistan

i read peshawar’s recorded history goes to 539bc and i see a photo of the beautiful islamia college

must be an amazing place to visit
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Meanwhile, Ellen's got herself mixed
up with a Pakistani gentlemen..
.. who nobody can understand what he is
saying. Not even Ellen.
MV5BNTcwMjZlZTgtM2VlMC00MDZkLWIzODQtMDRhZjE0N2QzMTgwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjY3MjUzNDk@._V1_UY1200_CR85,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg
 
Peshawer is crowded and dirty around the city,it does have history behind it, There are political rallies held there of all persuasion so if I went there and talk about democracy and human rights nobody is going to kill me.
One of Pakistan's biggest leftist party has its origins there.
In Pakistan there are hospitals that are free for the poor, even surgeries.
some of these are very professional but you would find them un sanitary. The doctors in these
hospitals are great diagnostician because they do'nt have all the medical tests that you take for granted.
Pakistan had the potential to be well of country in our region but unfortunately education was not a priority for our leaders. I would say education at around 20 to 25 percent which I think with a population of over 200 million is just not enough.So the future does not look very bright., we did produce to nobel prize winners and one of them was for physics.and the other a peace prize to this exceptional Malala Yousufzai who has become an international figure in education for women.
We have huge natural resources which have;nt been tapped.
We have decent free press but it is a new phenomena and lets see how it develops.you could to go there as a white okie but probably not hastled if you had local contacts
Did you know there are more PHD in Israel than you have in the entire muslim world.
Illeterate mullah of different sects have the country as hostage.
. But enlightened people are taking them on in fact i was so proud of my daughter taking on a mullah and leaving him speechless on tv..I distrust clergy regard less of their religion I dont trust politician
they all have their personal agenda.
What else do you wat to know.
Some of the highest mountains are in the north and the sites are unbelievable.
.
 
Peshawer is crowded and dirty around the city,it does have history behind it, There are political rallies held there of all persuasion so if I went there and talk about democracy and human rights nobody is going to kill me.
One of Pakistan's biggest leftist party has its origins there.
In Pakistan there are hospitals that are free for the poor, even surgeries.
some of these are very professional but you would find them un sanitary. The doctors in these
hospitals are great diagnostician because they do'nt have all the medical tests that you take for granted.
Pakistan had the potential to be well of country in our region but unfortunately education was not a priority for our leaders. I would say education at around 20 to 25 percent which I think with a population of over 200 million is just not enough.So the future does not look very bright., we did produce to nobel prize winners and one of them was for physics.and the other a peace prize to this exceptional Malala Yousufzai who has become an international figure in education for women.
We have huge natural resources which have;nt been tapped.
We have decent free press but it is a new phenomena and lets see how it develops.you could to go there as a white okie but probably not hastled if you had local contacts
Did you know there are more PHD in Israel than you have in the entire muslim world.
Illeterate mullah of different sects have the country as hostage.
. But enlightened people are taking them on in fact i was so proud of my daughter taking on a mullah and leaving him speechless on tv..I distrust clergy regard less of their religion I dont trust politician
they all have their personal agenda.
What else do you wat to know.
Some of the highest mountains are in the north and the sites are unbelievable.
.

awesome!

i could honestly go to peshawar with local contacts? that would be something amazing

i know little about pakistan but am super curious and now will read more

i match your distrust of clergy and politicians!
organized religion is not for me, i respect it as a place for family but wouldn’t think of the people who administer it as the means to power over the next life

i see now your views on education and how our free education thru high school must be something you admire while we take for granted

you must be so proud of your daughter!!!

had no ideas about phd’s in israel vs the muslim world and it leaves me with this question

what are your thoughts on why does the muslim world lags in education?

why does islam appear to be threatened by education?

something trivial but i must ask

are there trout or in your mountain streams and do people fish for them?

cheers

edit

love the diagnostic thoughts on medicine
 
awesome!

i could honestly go to peshawar with local contacts? that would be something amazing

i know little about pakistan but am super curious and now will read more

i match your distrust of clergy and politicians!
organized religion is not for me, i respect it as a place for family but wouldn’t think of the people who administer it as the means to power over the next life

i see now your views on education and how our free education thru high school must be something you admire while we take for granted

you must be so proud of your daughter!!!

had no ideas about phd’s in israel vs the muslim world and it leaves me with this question

what are your thoughts on why does the muslim world lags in education?

why does islam appear to be threatened by education?

something trivial but i must ask

are there trout or in your mountain streams and do people fish for them?

cheers

edit

love the diagnostic thoughts on medicine
Will you send your email so we can communicate instead of this board.
mine is abedi63@hotmail.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rdcldad
Too partisan a source? How about the US government? Back in 2011, well before Schumer, Obama, Clinton and others realized the value of the undocumented vote and actually were against illegal immigration for what it does to the low wage job market, the US government conducted a study on illegal aliens. Of particular interest are the findings on the murder rates in Arizona, California, New York, Texas and Florida.

  • Arizona: 68.57 illegals imprisoned for homicide per 100,000 illegal aliens, compared to 54.06 per 100,000 for legal citizens in Arizona (21.16% higher)
  • California: 92.7 illegals imprisoned for homicide per 100,000, compared to 74.1 per 100,000 for legal California residents (25.1% higher).
  • New York: 168.75 per 100,000 illegals imprisoned for homicide, compared to 48.12 in the legal New York population (250.69% higher).
  • Texas: 54.54 illegal aliens per 100,000 imprisoned for homicide, compared to 63.43 in the legal Texas population (14.02% lower).
  • Florida: 54.85 per 100,000 illegals imprisoned for homicide, compared to 67.8 for legal Florida residents. (19.1% lower).
  • *Note that these are rates of imprisonment per 100,000, not annual homicide rates.
So.... higher in Arizona, Cali, New York..... but you may notice - lower in Texas and Florida. I'll grant you that for sure, but lower by much less of a margin than the other 3 are significantly higher - especially New York.


It’s all sourced in my post. Read the 71 page government report I referenced and get back to me.

From you post:

the US government conducted a study on illegal aliens. Of particular interest are the findings on the murder rates in Arizona, California, New York, Texas and Florida...

  • Texas: 54.54 illegal aliens per 100,000 imprisoned for homicide, compared to 63.43 in the legal Texas population (14.02% lower)

I just looked at that document, searched "Texas" and can't find that. At all.

Your cut and paste cited a statistic, apparently from the CBO article, that seems at first blush to be out of sync with the Cato's arithmetic and when I look at the CBO article, that math that was represented in the cut and paste wasn't in the CBO article.

I'm hardly a fan of Cato Institute. I don't know who to believe. Wharry's been raising hell about this forever and he hasn't bothered to look at the basic numbers about whether these people are disproportionately criminal. I see his uninformed response, so I challenge you guys. You produce facts, they're out of sync with another set of facts, and your facts aren't supported by the cite for them. That's all I'm saying. I know exactly shit about immigration crime, this is my maiden inquiry into this talking point.

I didn't see that statistic or numbers that support that statistic in the CBO article. If I missed it, show me where it is. That's all I'm saying.

It’s a cut and paste..... from something I wrote last month. It’s not a cut and paste article and I cited multiple sources.

Well the Cato numbers are sure different at first glance, and the source didn't even address the claimed fact that cited to it.

And if there's credible information let's hear it. I'm not like enthused about crime, it should be a simple point to make, and the right wing Cato institute pretty obviously debunked that unsourced, pretty inflated Texas number and the CATO numbers seem well supported and cited. I dont like Cato but if they have a verifiable fact, I mean... Don't refer me to something out there last month, tell me what I'm missing there. It's all in black and white in this thread.

OK. But the Cato numbers don't address the deportation or lack of criminal complaints being reported for fear of same.

I honestly don't give a shit if you believe people who by definition are already federal fugitives are less likely to be a criminal than your neighbors who were born here, but you are wrong. It's weird that it even needs to be explained to you.

Indelicate as it may be, I should also out that sometimes people get misclassified demographically.

sMN7oOr.jpg

Aaaaaaand still waiting for the reconciliation of those numbers between your post and the Cato's numbers. You steered off onto demographic classifications.
 
Aaaaaaand still waiting for the reconciliation of those numbers between your post and the Cato's numbers. You steered off onto demographic classifications.

Good, you at least got off your lazy ass and found the post I’ve been re-linking for weeks now.

However, the point wasn’t me reconciling numbers you didn’t like from that post (numbers which actually supported YOUR ARGUMENT that illegal aliens committed fewer crimes than Americans per capita in Texas) on demand.

The point was did I cut and paste? No. Did I cite source material? Yes.
 
Good, you at least got off your lazy ass and found the post I’ve been re-linking for weeks now.

However, the point wasn’t me reconciling numbers you didn’t like from that post (numbers which actually supported YOUR ARGUMENT that illegal aliens committed fewer crimes than Americans per capita in Texas) on demand.

The point was did I cut and paste? No. Did I cite source material? Yes.

The counselor can't follow a line of thinking.

Bigoted and dumb is no way to go through life.
 
The counselor can't follow a line of thinking.

Bigoted and dumb is no way to go through life.

He's purposely obfuscating at this point. Right here he's trying to change the conversation to numbers in a post from months ago instead of his claim that I cut and paste, and do so without sourcing. Not tolerating it or taking the bait.
 
He's purposely obfuscating at this point. Right here he's trying to change the conversation to numbers in a post from months ago instead of his claim that I cut and paste, and do so without sourcing. Not tolerating it or taking the bait.

When your morals are relative to oneself, he's free to change them on a whim. (Odd given his constant bitching about how others live)

Literally saying anything to "win," including lying and misdirection, is a pretty clear strategy of the person whose morality is as firm as room temperature grape jelly.
 
However, the point wasn’t me reconciling numbers you didn’t like from that post (numbers which actually supported YOUR ARGUMENT that illegal aliens committed fewer crimes than Americans per capita in Texas) on demand.

The point was did I cut and paste? No. Did I cite source material? Yes.

You moron. I don't care if you cut and paste. I don't care if you back up and source the cut and paste later. I care that your cut and paste cited fraudulent numbers and I brought it to your attention and you changed the subject.

For once I dug in, took you seriously and you shit your pants. It's like you're beholden to the most dishonest, biased, bullshit sources or you dont' want to consider it.

You're obfuscating. My problem isn't with a cut and paste, that is appreciated if anything. You didn't cite it. Then you did. Fine. The numbers in your cut and paste weren't there when I followed it. You just act like a MAGA troll when it's pointed out. Every time, ya'll can no more engage in a good faith, fact based discussion than a man on Mars.
 
You moron. I don't care if you cut and paste. I don't care if you back up and source the cut and paste later. I care that your cut and paste cited fraudulent numbers and I brought it to your attention and you changed the subject.

For once I dug in, took you seriously and you shit your pants. It's like you're beholden to the most dishonest, biased, bullshit sources or you dont' want to consider it.

You're obfuscating. My problem isn't with a cut and paste, that is appreciated if anything. You didn't cite it. Then you did. Fine. The numbers in your cut and paste weren't there when I followed it. You just act like a MAGA troll when it's pointed out. Every time, ya'll can no more engage in a good faith, fact based discussion than a man on Mars.

See folks what you have here is basic Shitstain gaslighting 101. He gets his ass handed to him daily for years, and like all good narcissists simply changes the facts to fit his preferred reality - rather than take stock of the volumes of failure he's authored over the years, he just declares victory and redefines what actually happened to fit that narrative.

You are as usual, full of shit. Period.

Here's what actually happened.

1. In January, I wrote up a well researched reply to Toon in THIS thread regarding the obvious propaganda lie that all you morons swallow regarding illegal aliens. And that is, that they commit fewer crimes than native citizens. I provided contextual research to prove that was not the case. Eventually that thread died.

2. In February, this moronic topic comes back up in this thread with you unsurprisingly leading the propaganda charge with this absurd fairy tale - again omitting tons of contextual information that nukes the absurd idea that illegal aliens commit FEWER CRIMES than the native US population. On page 3 of this thread Read again HERE, I reposted the same well-researched post a second time.

3. You attack the post this time. Inexplicably attacking the one line that actually supports your position: Texas: 54.54 illegal aliens per 100,000 imprisoned for homicide, compared to 63.43 in the legal Texas population (14.02% lower).

Go on dipshit. Read it again. Move your lips, and read it out loud.

English to Shitstain translation: In a post about illegals actually committing far more crimes than native born citizens, I ACKNOWLEDGED that in Texas, the numbers seem to actually indicate the opposite - that Illegals commit fewer crimes per capita there - ceding to you (dipshit) the evident fact that in Texas, illegals actually DO commit fewer crimes and acknowledging this anomaly.

You proceeded to attack me saying you can't find this number in the reports I sourced. And have since then hounded me for "bad numbers" over this. If anyone reading this can explain why in the deep blue fvck you would have such a problem with the above bolded (red) quote which again, actually by itself seems to support your retarded position, I would love to have someone explain that to me like I'm 5 years old. I honestly don't think you even realize you've been bitching for months about something that supported your own stupid argument while you ignored everything else that tore it to shreds. Classic Shitstain.

4. Fast forward to last week... On the fist page of this post, titled How Would You React? I posted a rather lengthy wakeup call to you - trying again to introduce you to several aspects of reality. (I'll post it again (cutting and pasting myself FYI) in a follow up to this post, so you can ignore it again.

Your reply:

Whoa now. I missed this volume. From your brain to mine, huh? You're telling me you wrote all of this? All yours, no cut and paste? I'm not reading another one of your gaslighting cut and paste jobs. If you actually sat down and typed this out with your little stubby mongy fingers (or even dictated it) I'm gonna read it. If it's more of your lyin'-ass cut and pastes I'm gonna make fun of you some more. Which is it?

I replied and told you:

It's mine, as is everything I ever post.

No idea where this "cut and paste" lie is coming from, but I take my journalism degree background seriously and never post anything as my own if I didn't write it.

On the rare occasion where I DO cut and paste, I always provide linked source material and attribute the cut and paste to the material. Again, you are full of shit and can't produce one instance of anything contrary to what I just said. Not one. Go ahead and look.

So, yeah. Take a look and rest easy in the knowledge that I wrote it 100% extemporaneously.


To which you replied:

Yes, I commented in the very thread when you posted an unsourced cut and paste that had bullshit numbers. You're lying out your ass if you deny it. LYING. OUT. YOUR. ASS.

I then told you to prove it, and you said you would.

Not surprisingly, you disappeared from that thread like the basic lying bitch you are - even after getting called out by me and others who watched your shit get pushed in in real time.

Since then, you tried to act like you hadn't seen the link I had posted (twice), and then finally with no other way out, you shifted your argument back to bitching about the numbers I cited in a post from January which actually by themselves supported your argument.

And now here you are today claiming you never had an issue with cutting and pasting. Your own words show that your original recent issue with me was whether I had actually written something you might read or it was "more of my lyin cut and pastes."

You accused me of plagiarism and lying. And today you say: My problem isn't with a cut and paste, that is appreciated if anything. You didn't cite it. Then you did. Fine.. Whatever man. It's all right here for you or anyone else to take a look at.

You got your ass whipped yet again and now you are trying to save face. Period, end of story. After all of this, I still for some reason low key like you even though you are a complete dickhole most of the time.

Help me help you stop being a moron.
 
Here's the post you ignored in the "How Would You React Thread" which you then followed up with your plagiarism accusations.

__________________

Truth for you... blame it on the incels, privately self reflect, I don't really care. This is from my brain to yours.

1. There was no collusion and for YEARS that was the central thesis. You and every other simpering fool (ahem... @Pokeabear ) who bought into Russia puppet theology can suck it. It's been definitively proven to be a lie, this narrative you lapped up. This shouldn't make you angry at MAGA types. If you actually had a free brain, you would blame DNC leadership and the activist national media for getting your hopes up time after time after time. They lied to you. They propagandized you. They used you. A more self aware, less "projecty" man would be angry about that. But you don't have a fee brain, because sir - it is you who is the #bornfollower. Even now you are searching for the new narrative and simply going with "Maga makes me want to take a long hot soapy shower.... (naughty naughty soap)" until the next emoluments "scandal" comes along to bitch about like a little weeny.

You should go home and rethink your life.

tenor.gif


2. The investigation was one big obstruction trap, and yet the WH was completely forthcoming and no legitimate obstruction can be pointed to beyond Trump not enjoying being the subject of what inarguably was a baseless witch hunt. I mean, two years and jack shit. JACK SHIT dude. How long do you really think it took Meuller to figure that out? 4 or 5 hours tops. Just picture him walking into his new office and asking...

Mueller: OK guys so what do we have on this collusion stuff...

Staff guy: Well sir, uh... Nothing but this bullshit dossier full of paid for, unverified op-o which has been used very sketchily to spy on the Trump campaign since well before the claimed Papadopolous/Downer origin story, sir.

Mueller: Whelp... (rubs hands together) let's see what we can create regarding obstruction. We gotta drag this thing out to at least the mid-terms! Get busy boys, but you know... not too busy, if you know what I mean. *winks*

3. Process crimes and Russian nationals are all you have. Manafort is clearly a scumbag and Trump should've known better than to hire a Podesta guy like that. I'll give you that. Bad judgement there for sure, but you crowed up and down this board about this being an organized crime kind of organization full of bad people and you know got dam well that no presidential campaign in history was clean or full of good guys who didn't bend rules and work in the grey areas to win. Name me one single president whose campaign team could've withstood this proctological examination and not revealed (or caused) some process crimes along the way. Now, you'll spin this as me giving all that a pass and you'll be wrong. All I am saying here is that you have clutched your pearls for years about shit that is likely far more common than not amongst all presidential campaigns. It's a dirty business.

4. Prediction..... your shower fantasies aside, Trump's approval goes UP after the dust settles here. The Russian hoax has artificially retarded it (as it was designed to do) since day one. God forbid people actually look at job numbers, economy, lack of intervention into new wars, and actual attention being given to border security. Shit dude, if they look at that stuff and ARE smart enough to be pissed about being lied to by the activist media for two years, they just may vote for the guy who is getting shit done. I invite you to hold me accountable to this prediction. Good luck with that.

5. Now, while all that is sinking in - don't forget. Huber is coming. OIG is coming. Barr himself has stated that he is looking into the details of this "investigation." I've told you since day one, it's bad and there is pain coming. Now ask yourself... if Russian collusion completely didn't happen, what was behind Brennan, Clapper, Schiff, Swallwell and the rest all claiming to have SEEN WITH THEIR OWN EYES the proof of Russian collusion? Why did they lie to you so effortlessly when they had nothing? Why do they still continue to lie about this? Because their asses are on the line. Thats why. If Russian collusion did not happen, what did? Well, that brings us to...

6. The real story was the spying scandal OF the Obama admin on the Trump campaign. It started well before the Papadopolous meeting. Was Obama involved? Don't know. But Brennan sure as fvck was. Did he answer to anyone above him or was he the "mastermind" behind a coup attempt? I'll stop here because this will be a lot of conversations for another day, but just want to remind you - I've been 100% right since day 1 about Russian collusion, so you would be wise to read this post and consider the strong likelihood that I am going to continue to be right about what happens now that the pendulum has begun it's swing in the other direction. If you come at the king, you best not miss.

7. Trump will easily win reelection, and @07pilt will owe me $100. It's the only bet I'm making. I have a lot more fun being right than in wagering with delusional internet nerds like you guys. Anyway, you want to really get depressed? Take a long look at the field of losers and #bornfollowers the DNC is trotting out to be slaughtered by Trump in 2020. This is going to be a Walter Mondale level destruction of whichever unlucky idiot manages to prostrate himself/herself before the alter of intersectionality in the most obedient possible way. This eventual "winner" will be destroyed on the debate stage as he/she tries to pivot from his/her far left primary platform to a more palatable moderate dem platform in the general election and it'll be blood in the water. The Trumpian nickname for whomever this is will be all that's left of them when it's done. And then, you will have 4 more years of this guy - as a second term president with no bullshit collusion albatross keeping him from deep dicking what's left of the leftist agenda in this country, and man - if the dems don't get their shit together and articulate something beyond "orange man bad," he may be doing it with a supermajority.

So eat up that cold turd of reality and smile, because even though you hate the guy - he's (say it with me, Reek) Making American Great Again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ostatedchi
See folks what you have here is basic Shitstain gaslighting 101. He gets his ass handed to him daily for years, and like all good narcissists simply changes the facts to fit his preferred reality - rather than take stock of the volumes of failure he's authored over the years, he just declares victory and redefines what actually happened to fit that narrative.

You are as usual, full of shit. Period.

Here's what actually happened.

1. In January, I wrote up a well researched reply to Toon in THIS thread regarding the obvious propaganda lie that all you morons swallow regarding illegal aliens. And that is, that they commit fewer crimes than native citizens. I provided contextual research to prove that was not the case. Eventually that thread died.

2. In February, this moronic topic comes back up in this thread with you unsurprisingly leading the propaganda charge with this absurd fairy tale - again omitting tons of contextual information that nukes the absurd idea that illegal aliens commit FEWER CRIMES than the native US population. On page 3 of this thread Read again HERE, I reposted the same well-researched post a second time.

3. You attack the post this time. Inexplicably attacking the one line that actually supports your position: Texas: 54.54 illegal aliens per 100,000 imprisoned for homicide, compared to 63.43 in the legal Texas population (14.02% lower).

Go on dipshit. Read it again. Move your lips, and read it out loud.

English to Shitstain translation: In a post about illegals actually committing far more crimes than native born citizens, I ACKNOWLEDGED that in Texas, the numbers seem to actually indicate the opposite - that Illegals commit fewer crimes per capita there - ceding to you (dipshit) the evident fact that in Texas, illegals actually DO commit fewer crimes and acknowledging this anomaly.

You proceeded to attack me saying you can't find this number in the reports I sourced. And have since then hounded me for "bad numbers" over this. If anyone reading this can explain why in the deep blue fvck you would have such a problem with the above bolded (red) quote which again, actually by itself seems to support your retarded position, I would love to have someone explain that to me like I'm 5 years old. I honestly don't think you even realize you've been bitching for months about something that supported your own stupid argument while you ignored everything else that tore it to shreds. Classic Shitstain.

4. Fast forward to last week... On the fist page of this post, titled How Would You React? I posted a rather lengthy wakeup call to you - trying again to introduce you to several aspects of reality. (I'll post it again (cutting and pasting myself FYI) in a follow up to this post, so you can ignore it again.

Your reply:

Whoa now. I missed this volume. From your brain to mine, huh? You're telling me you wrote all of this? All yours, no cut and paste? I'm not reading another one of your gaslighting cut and paste jobs. If you actually sat down and typed this out with your little stubby mongy fingers (or even dictated it) I'm gonna read it. If it's more of your lyin'-ass cut and pastes I'm gonna make fun of you some more. Which is it?

I replied and told you:

It's mine, as is everything I ever post.

No idea where this "cut and paste" lie is coming from, but I take my journalism degree background seriously and never post anything as my own if I didn't write it.

On the rare occasion where I DO cut and paste, I always provide linked source material and attribute the cut and paste to the material. Again, you are full of shit and can't produce one instance of anything contrary to what I just said. Not one. Go ahead and look.

So, yeah. Take a look and rest easy in the knowledge that I wrote it 100% extemporaneously.


To which you replied:

Yes, I commented in the very thread when you posted an unsourced cut and paste that had bullshit numbers. You're lying out your ass if you deny it. LYING. OUT. YOUR. ASS.

I then told you to prove it, and you said you would.

Not surprisingly, you disappeared from that thread like the basic lying bitch you are - even after getting called out by me and others who watched your shit get pushed in in real time.

Since then, you tried to act like you hadn't seen the link I had posted (twice), and then finally with no other way out, you shifted your argument back to bitching about the numbers I cited in a post from January which actually by themselves supported your argument.

And now here you are today claiming you never had an issue with cutting and pasting. Your own words show that your original recent issue with me was whether I had actually written something you might read or it was "more of my lyin cut and pastes."

You accused me of plagiarism and lying. And today you say: My problem isn't with a cut and paste, that is appreciated if anything. You didn't cite it. Then you did. Fine.. Whatever man. It's all right here for you or anyone else to take a look at.

You got your ass whipped yet again and now you are trying to save face. Period, end of story. After all of this, I still for some reason low key like you even though you are a complete dickhole most of the time.

Help me help you stop being a moron.
ScrawnySafeEyas-max-1mb.gif
 
Here's the post you ignored in the "How Would You React Thread" which you then followed up with your plagiarism accusations.

__________________

Truth for you... blame it on the incels, privately self reflect, I don't really care. This is from my brain to yours.

1. There was no collusion and for YEARS that was the central thesis. You and every other simpering fool (ahem... @Pokeabear ) who bought into Russia puppet theology can suck it. It's been definitively proven to be a lie, this narrative you lapped up. This shouldn't make you angry at MAGA types. If you actually had a free brain, you would blame DNC leadership and the activist national media for getting your hopes up time after time after time. They lied to you. They propagandized you. They used you. A more self aware, less "projecty" man would be angry about that. But you don't have a fee brain, because sir - it is you who is the #bornfollower. Even now you are searching for the new narrative and simply going with "Maga makes me want to take a long hot soapy shower.... (naughty naughty soap)" until the next emoluments "scandal" comes along to bitch about like a little weeny.

You should go home and rethink your life.

tenor.gif


2. The investigation was one big obstruction trap, and yet the WH was completely forthcoming and no legitimate obstruction can be pointed to beyond Trump not enjoying being the subject of what inarguably was a baseless witch hunt. I mean, two years and jack shit. JACK SHIT dude. How long do you really think it took Meuller to figure that out? 4 or 5 hours tops. Just picture him walking into his new office and asking...

Mueller: OK guys so what do we have on this collusion stuff...

Staff guy: Well sir, uh... Nothing but this bullshit dossier full of paid for, unverified op-o which has been used very sketchily to spy on the Trump campaign since well before the claimed Papadopolous/Downer origin story, sir.

Mueller: Whelp... (rubs hands together) let's see what we can create regarding obstruction. We gotta drag this thing out to at least the mid-terms! Get busy boys, but you know... not too busy, if you know what I mean. *winks*

3. Process crimes and Russian nationals are all you have. Manafort is clearly a scumbag and Trump should've known better than to hire a Podesta guy like that. I'll give you that. Bad judgement there for sure, but you crowed up and down this board about this being an organized crime kind of organization full of bad people and you know got dam well that no presidential campaign in history was clean or full of good guys who didn't bend rules and work in the grey areas to win. Name me one single president whose campaign team could've withstood this proctological examination and not revealed (or caused) some process crimes along the way. Now, you'll spin this as me giving all that a pass and you'll be wrong. All I am saying here is that you have clutched your pearls for years about shit that is likely far more common than not amongst all presidential campaigns. It's a dirty business.

4. Prediction..... your shower fantasies aside, Trump's approval goes UP after the dust settles here. The Russian hoax has artificially retarded it (as it was designed to do) since day one. God forbid people actually look at job numbers, economy, lack of intervention into new wars, and actual attention being given to border security. Shit dude, if they look at that stuff and ARE smart enough to be pissed about being lied to by the activist media for two years, they just may vote for the guy who is getting shit done. I invite you to hold me accountable to this prediction. Good luck with that.

5. Now, while all that is sinking in - don't forget. Huber is coming. OIG is coming. Barr himself has stated that he is looking into the details of this "investigation." I've told you since day one, it's bad and there is pain coming. Now ask yourself... if Russian collusion completely didn't happen, what was behind Brennan, Clapper, Schiff, Swallwell and the rest all claiming to have SEEN WITH THEIR OWN EYES the proof of Russian collusion? Why did they lie to you so effortlessly when they had nothing? Why do they still continue to lie about this? Because their asses are on the line. Thats why. If Russian collusion did not happen, what did? Well, that brings us to...

6. The real story was the spying scandal OF the Obama admin on the Trump campaign. It started well before the Papadopolous meeting. Was Obama involved? Don't know. But Brennan sure as fvck was. Did he answer to anyone above him or was he the "mastermind" behind a coup attempt? I'll stop here because this will be a lot of conversations for another day, but just want to remind you - I've been 100% right since day 1 about Russian collusion, so you would be wise to read this post and consider the strong likelihood that I am going to continue to be right about what happens now that the pendulum has begun it's swing in the other direction. If you come at the king, you best not miss.

7. Trump will easily win reelection, and @07pilt will owe me $100. It's the only bet I'm making. I have a lot more fun being right than in wagering with delusional internet nerds like you guys. Anyway, you want to really get depressed? Take a long look at the field of losers and #bornfollowers the DNC is trotting out to be slaughtered by Trump in 2020. This is going to be a Walter Mondale level destruction of whichever unlucky idiot manages to prostrate himself/herself before the alter of intersectionality in the most obedient possible way. This eventual "winner" will be destroyed on the debate stage as he/she tries to pivot from his/her far left primary platform to a more palatable moderate dem platform in the general election and it'll be blood in the water. The Trumpian nickname for whomever this is will be all that's left of them when it's done. And then, you will have 4 more years of this guy - as a second term president with no bullshit collusion albatross keeping him from deep dicking what's left of the leftist agenda in this country, and man - if the dems don't get their shit together and articulate something beyond "orange man bad," he may be doing it with a supermajority.

So eat up that cold turd of reality and smile, because even though you hate the guy - he's (say it with me, Reek) Making American Great Again.

You created a citation paper!?!?

@Syskatine , you're proper F'd.

(I know because the source material is Literal Lee Right There)
 
In all fairness here those cut and pasted numbers aren't to be found in the cited source material.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
Pilt should just self ban after that. There's no recovering. Ever.
 
In all fairness here those cut and pasted numbers aren't to be found in the cited source material.

When I get time, I will be happy to see if I can figure out where they came from then. It was 3 months ago and I didn't just shit them out of thin air, so there may be a citation error. I'll check. But in the meantime, you do see that the Texas numbers he's disputing actually support his claim right? I'm not imagining this am I?
 
When I get time, I will be happy to see if I can figure out where they came from then. It was 3 months ago and I didn't just shit them out of thin air, so there may be a citation error. I'll check. But in the meantime, you do see that the Texas numbers he's disputing actually support his claim right? I'm not imagining this am I?
Yes, but I think they were also most easily fact checked.
 
See folks what you have here is basic Shitstain gaslighting 101. He gets his ass handed to him daily for years, and like all good narcissists simply changes the facts to fit his preferred reality - rather than take stock of the volumes of failure he's authored over the years, he just declares victory and redefines what actually happened to fit that narrative.

You are as usual, full of shit. Period.

Here's what actually happened.

1. In January, I wrote up a well researched reply to Toon in THIS thread regarding the obvious propaganda lie that all you morons swallow regarding illegal aliens. And that is, that they commit fewer crimes than native citizens. I provided contextual research to prove that was not the case. Eventually that thread died.

2. In February, this moronic topic comes back up in this thread with you unsurprisingly leading the propaganda charge with this absurd fairy tale - again omitting tons of contextual information that nukes the absurd idea that illegal aliens commit FEWER CRIMES than the native US population. On page 3 of this thread Read again HERE, I reposted the same well-researched post a second time.

3. You attack the post this time. Inexplicably attacking the one line that actually supports your position: Texas: 54.54 illegal aliens per 100,000 imprisoned for homicide, compared to 63.43 in the legal Texas population (14.02% lower).

Go on dipshit. Read it again. Move your lips, and read it out loud.

English to Shitstain translation: In a post about illegals actually committing far more crimes than native born citizens, I ACKNOWLEDGED that in Texas, the numbers seem to actually indicate the opposite - that Illegals commit fewer crimes per capita there - ceding to you (dipshit) the evident fact that in Texas, illegals actually DO commit fewer crimes and acknowledging this anomaly.

You proceeded to attack me saying you can't find this number in the reports I sourced. And have since then hounded me for "bad numbers" over this. If anyone reading this can explain why in the deep blue fvck you would have such a problem with the above bolded (red) quote which again, actually by itself seems to support your retarded position, I would love to have someone explain that to me like I'm 5 years old. I honestly don't think you even realize you've been bitching for months about something that supported your own stupid argument while you ignored everything else that tore it to shreds. Classic Shitstain.

4. Fast forward to last week... On the fist page of this post, titled How Would You React? I posted a rather lengthy wakeup call to you - trying again to introduce you to several aspects of reality. (I'll post it again (cutting and pasting myself FYI) in a follow up to this post, so you can ignore it again.

Your reply:

Whoa now. I missed this volume. From your brain to mine, huh? You're telling me you wrote all of this? All yours, no cut and paste? I'm not reading another one of your gaslighting cut and paste jobs. If you actually sat down and typed this out with your little stubby mongy fingers (or even dictated it) I'm gonna read it. If it's more of your lyin'-ass cut and pastes I'm gonna make fun of you some more. Which is it?

I replied and told you:

It's mine, as is everything I ever post.

No idea where this "cut and paste" lie is coming from, but I take my journalism degree background seriously and never post anything as my own if I didn't write it.

On the rare occasion where I DO cut and paste, I always provide linked source material and attribute the cut and paste to the material. Again, you are full of shit and can't produce one instance of anything contrary to what I just said. Not one. Go ahead and look.

So, yeah. Take a look and rest easy in the knowledge that I wrote it 100% extemporaneously.


To which you replied:

Yes, I commented in the very thread when you posted an unsourced cut and paste that had bullshit numbers. You're lying out your ass if you deny it. LYING. OUT. YOUR. ASS.

I then told you to prove it, and you said you would.

Not surprisingly, you disappeared from that thread like the basic lying bitch you are - even after getting called out by me and others who watched your shit get pushed in in real time.

Since then, you tried to act like you hadn't seen the link I had posted (twice), and then finally with no other way out, you shifted your argument back to bitching about the numbers I cited in a post from January which actually by themselves supported your argument.

And now here you are today claiming you never had an issue with cutting and pasting. Your own words show that your original recent issue with me was whether I had actually written something you might read or it was "more of my lyin cut and pastes."

You accused me of plagiarism and lying. And today you say: My problem isn't with a cut and paste, that is appreciated if anything. You didn't cite it. Then you did. Fine.. Whatever man. It's all right here for you or anyone else to take a look at.

You got your ass whipped yet again and now you are trying to save face. Period, end of story. After all of this, I still for some reason low key like you even though you are a complete dickhole most of the time.

Help me help you stop being a moron.

You are still being a moron, except you're an obsessive, spiraling moron now. I'm not going to sit down and read all your spiraling shit. I straightforwardly asked you about that wrong number like 3 times -- see above -- and you changed the subject.

By the way, I havent' read your lengthy post. I never will, I dont' give a shit. That's because you're a moron. I tried to engage you civilly, gave you the benefit of the doubt, and even took the time to pull the chronology in the above post. That's twice I've invested time in you. So type a freakin' bible if you want, you posted stupid numbers that you cut and pasted, I asked you two or three times what I was missing, and you went moron Maga. I tried to extend an olive branch a couple days ago and you're a typical trolling maga moron. If you don't like me or the way I treat you you can ignore me, ban me, or start having some good faith and intellectual honesty.
 
You are still being a moron, except you're an obsessive, spiraling moron now. I'm not going to sit down and read all your spiraling shit. I straightforwardly asked you about that wrong number like 3 times -- see above -- and you changed the subject.

By the way, I havent' read your lengthy post. I never will, I dont' give a shit. That's because you're a moron. I tried to engage you civilly, gave you the benefit of the doubt, and even took the time to pull the chronology in the above post. That's twice I've invested time in you. So type a freakin' bible if you want, you posted stupid numbers that you cut and pasted, I asked you two or three times what I was missing, and you went moron Maga. I tried to extend an olive branch a couple days ago and you're a typical trolling maga moron. If you don't like me or the way I treat you you can ignore me, ban me, or start having some good faith and intellectual honesty.
54c0dda4-c989-48c0-a35f-442ee8c53e9d.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaPoke
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT