caitlinjohnstone.com.au
Where in Gaza should Hamas keep its hostages?
They shouldn't have taken hostages and damn sure shouldn't be holding hostages. Duh
They should have thought about that before they took the hostages, don't you think.
Agree. But they did take hostages. Given that where in Gaza do you think they should hide them?
Yes, that’s what I think. Where in Gaza should they hide them now that they’ve taken them.
What part do you not get? They shouldn't have hostages but since you ask, damn sure not in a refugee camp.
So no response to what the article discusses? Got it.
True. I agree.
Depends on how I look at it. If I look at it from the perspective of an outsider, yea Israel should have done many things differently but If I look at from the perspective of Israel I can't really blame them for going overboard protecting their country. After October 7th the dynamic changed.
Now you’re using Taliban logic:
Such as?
I'm not just asking about after October 7th. I'm asking about both before and after.
Then where should they keep them? I agreed with you they should not have taken the hostages. But they did take hostages even though neither of us think they should have. Since they took hostages - even though we both agree they should not have - and since you say not in a refugee camp, and others say not within populated areas, my question, which is perfectly reasonable, is where should they be hiding the hostages they should not have taken, as we both agree they should not have done? Have I shown to your satisfaction that I *do* get they should not have taken hostages? Now please be so kind as to say where they should be keeping them - since they took hostages even though both of us say they should not have.
I'm not sure logic is in the equation, at least as you're saying here. Hamas captured hostages. Many on this board opine that the hostages should not be kept in populated areas of Gaza. It is not unreasonable or illogical to ask where they should be kept. Yours is Comment No. 16 and so far all anyone says is where they should *not* keep them. As passionate as the "where they should not keep them" crowd is, it is both reasonable and logical to ask where they *should* be kept.
So Israel should kill Qatari civilians instead.?
I don't know are the Qatari civilians going to try and kill the Israeli soldiers? If they do sure, Israeli soldiers shouldn't allow themselves to be killed.
Oh, i see. You think all 274 Palestinians who were killed by the IDF during the raid, and the roughly 500 who were injured by the bombs, the tanks, the IDF soldiers, etc. were equally armed and fought back with ferocity, trying to kill the soldiers. Damn they were bad at it! 274 dead to 1, 500+ injured to what, zero? I do give you credit for finding an answer no matter how bizarre it is.
274 eh? Still sticking to your Gazan Health ministry sources I see.
As opposed to in Al Jazeera news reporters homes, right?
Your daily dose of Caitlin:
Ignoring Daily Massacres In Gaza While Still Babbling About October 7
We’re seeing new massacres every goddamn ****ing day, but western politicians and media can’t stop babbling about one single massacre happening hundreds of days ago.
They couldn’t take care of it in 1967. The Zionist lobby had not yet sufficiently softened up the American public, nor had it yet completely corrupted both the Legislative and Administrative branches of the American government to accept genocide as a workable solution to their desire for a Palestinian-free “Greater Israel.” It has taken half a century for the softening and corruption to get to that point.Should have taken care of it back is 1967.
