ADVERTISEMENT

Anything yet on Trump Russia collusion?

Thats a bet most are willing to take.

Yep. Conservatives overwhelmingly support laws that take away their ability to stand up to big business... because they think they are big business. Then, they turn right around and bitch that liberals are taking their rights. Health care, internet privacy, conservatism has totally handed it to big business and complained about liberals not respecting the individual. And the one thing that will violently change their mind in my experience is when their ox is finally gored. Hell then knows no wrath like a conservative denied justice from their court system they've been paying taxes for all these years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GL97
Gorsich will gut you and your family the instant that you or they become a threat to the bottom line of big business. Trace his opinions and conservatives ramblings and he is nothing more than a shill for big business and deep pockets. Every time.
At least he understands the 2nd Amendment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaPoke
It's all that matters. The conservatives can deny health care, economic opportunity (the real function of education), justice, privacy, and spend like drunken sailors but if they keep guns cheap and available their base doesn't care. It's a brilliant tactic to exploit their own base, gotta hand it to them. And watch --- conservatives will bitch about their health insurance premiums on this board before the month is out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GL97
It's all that matters. The conservatives can deny health care, economic opportunity (the real function of education), justice, privacy, and spend like drunken sailors but if they keep guns cheap and available their base doesn't care. It's a brilliant tactic to exploit their own base, gotta hand it to them. And watch --- conservatives will bitch about their health insurance premiums on this board before the month is out.
90
 
@CowboyJD your cheerleader hypotheses is outdated.

Wall
Budget
Repeal / Replace
Tax Reform
Immigration/refugees
Has not drained the swamp
Globalist daughter has too much influence
And as @07pilt posted (and you liked), I had hopes Trump would address the problems of the inner cities. Hasn't even been discussed yet. Disappointing.

Also.. I was definitely not a fan of bombing Syria - though in retrospect, it obviously did have it's benefits, provided we don't expand into regime change - and I posted about it multiple times on this board at the time.

To this point, I consider these to be First 100 day failures. I remain hopeful that some of the things listed above will get sorted out, and agree 100 days is a flimsy standard, but I'm not and have never been a cheerleader. I've been optimistic and as always - have enjoyed tweaking absurdities like the Russia nonsense - which is exactly what it's always been.

As for Russia, I've been consistent that it's bullshit and nothing has changed so sometimes I like to rub people's noses in it. People eventually *mostly* just stopped talking about it, and I think that they need to be reminded from time to time.

Who said anything about cheerleading? I certainly didn't call you a cheerleader....and I'm not one to shy away from calling someone a cheerleader if I think that's what they are being.

You have been on record calling the Russia thing bullshit from the beginning.....and you obviously want to be right about that...like anyone would.

Your evaluation that people eventually "mostly" just stopped talking about it is "mostly" inaccurate.

IMO, your "I told you so Tour" is incredibly premature.

That's what I meant with my comment.
 
Last edited:
Gorsich will gut you and your family the instant that you or they become a threat to the bottom line of big business.

I agree. I wish Apple, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, General Motors, and General Electric would just go away.
 
Patience grasshopper!

Exactly. Ongoing investigations.

Think about how long the right has investigated the Clintons. And yet those on the right expect an investigation of this Russian mess to be wrapped up by now?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
Is there some kind of law that says Trump has to provide them? I've been searching but I'm no lawyer...

If it was the Clintons, or the Obamas, or any other Democrat who refused to release their tax returns, what would you be saying?

I think we all know the answer to that question.
 
Gorsich will gut you and your family the instant that you or they become a threat to the bottom line of big business. Trace his opinions and conservatives ramblings and he is nothing more than a shill for big business and deep pockets. Every time.

Bingo.

Not surprising that Trump nominated him at all.
 
It's all that matters. The conservatives can deny health care, economic opportunity (the real function of education), justice, privacy, and spend like drunken sailors but if they keep guns cheap and available their base doesn't care. It's a brilliant tactic to exploit their own base, gotta hand it to them. And watch --- conservatives will bitch about their health insurance premiums on this board before the month is out.

You are on fire on this thread.

When all else fails for Republican leaders, all they have to do is bring up guns, abortion, and homosexual marriage...and their base loses sight of every other issue.
 
If it was the Clintons, or the Obamas, or any other Democrat who refused to release their tax returns, what would you be saying?

I think we all know the answer to that question.
I don't give a shit actually. Obama released his and was still dreadfully incompetent. But keep pecking the dirt floor. Gotta be some crumbs of corn somewhere.
 
You are on fire on this thread.

When all else fails for Republican leaders, all they have to do is bring up guns, abortion, and homosexual marriage...and their base loses sight of every other issue.
As opposed to Democrat leaders and their no guns, abortion, and gay marriage, sprinkled liberally with fluid genders and isms and phobes these days.

Too freaking easy Clinton. Too freaking easy.
 
I don't give a shit actually.

Yeah, you feel this way right now because it is Trump, a Republican. If it was the Clintons or Obamas, who you seem to think are the root of all evilness, you wouldn't feel this way. It would then be a big deal to you.

At least be honest about it.
 
Were you ok with those executive orders?



Probably? You vote for the man and the best you got was probably?

lol

Was I ok with Obama's? No.
Trump's? Yes, so far it's mostly been undoing Obama's overreach. It's not a blank check however.

Pretty sure you don't understand my use of probably.

Teenager girls don't say "lol" as much as you do, FYI. It's like a neon sign.
 
Was I ok with Obama's? No.
Trump's? Yes

At least you are honest about your hypocrisy.

When the next Democrat President takes over, just remember your support of Trump's executive orders and the reason for it.

Pretty sure you don't understand my use of probably.

So you were not saying that his appointee is probably a "constitutionalist".
 
When the next Democrat President takes over, just remember your support of Trump's executive orders and the reason for it.

I'm sure. And certainly I can also count on you to disregard the context (as you just did) again and forget my many criticisms of Trump so it'll fit your simple view.
 
And certainly I can also count on you to disregard the context (as you just did) again

No, I fully understand the context and how you now justify your support of a President issuing so many executive orders (when before you didn't).

However, supporters of the next Democrat President could also justify his/her executive orders using the same context and justification. And you should fully understand it and not complain about it at that point.
 
No, I fully understand the context and how you now justify your support of a President issuing so many executive orders (when before you didn't).

However, supporters of the next Democrat President could also justify his/her executive orders using the same context and justification. And you should fully understand it and not complain about it at that point.
Since you said nothing about BHO's, we can assume you are fine with Trumps.
 
No, I fully understand the context and how you now justify your support of a President issuing so many executive orders (when before you didn't).

However, supporters of the next Democrat President could also justify his/her executive orders using the same context and justification. And you should fully understand it and not complain about it at that point.

I was warning people about that very thing during the Bush administration. But thanks.
 
Since you said nothing about BHO's, we can assume you are fine with Trumps.

I have some concerns about the number of executive orders that recent Presidents have issued. Still, in comparison to past Presidents, it really isn't that many. For example, FDR signed 3,721 executive orders and Wilson signed 1,803.

While I would prefer less executive orders, I understand the political necessity of them. So while I disagree with some of the content of the orders Trump has issued, I wouldn't make his use of executive orders a political issue to use against him (as Trump and his supporters did against Obama but now they embrace executive orders).

The content is what I believe should be the political issue.
 
Yeah, you feel this way right now because it is Trump, a Republican. If it was the Clintons or Obamas, who you seem to think are the root of all evilness, you wouldn't feel this way. It would then be a big deal to you.

At least be honest about it.
I'm not a Republican and never have been. Keep pecking.

I don't think Obama or H. Clinton is the root of all evil. That's as retarded as some random dude claiming to be a player performance specialist on Twitter or something. Obama was incompetent IMO and was nothing but an ideologue. And Clinton is a pile of corrupt steaming shit. She couldn't seem to understand basic law as SOS, couldn't figure out how to use a fax machine, and seems to have a memory deficit. Or she's a prolific liar. Either way, that isn't someone who should be president. Does that maybe expand your binary thinking?
 
I don't think Obama or H. Clinton is the root of all evil. That's as retarded as some random dude claiming to be a player performance specialist on Twitter or something. Obama was incompetent IMO and was nothing but an ideologue. And Clinton is a pile of corrupt steaming shit.

Like I posted, if this was Clinton or Obama...you would be posting something completely different about them not releasing their tax cuts.

btw, it is interesting that you called Obama an ideologue. What ideology was he an ideologue of in your opinion?
 
Like I posted, if this was Clinton or Obama...you would be posting something completely different about them not releasing their tax cuts.
Nope. You're wrong yet again. I don't give a shit about tax returns whether you like it or not. Maybe you thought you had a crystal ball when it came to recruits. When it comes to me, you're just pecking in random dirt. Keep pecking.

btw, it is interesting that you called Obama an ideologue. What ideology was he an ideologue of in your opinion?
You're a die hard partisan. You know exactly what I'm talking about. You're OK with it because you think just as the Party instructed you to.
 
You're a die hard partisan. You know exactly what I'm talking about. You're OK with it because you think just as the Party instructed you to.

I will ask again...

What ideology was Obama an ideologue of in your opinion?
 
Last edited:
You already know.

No I don't. I don't think Obama was an ideologue. I also know people who have complained that Obama was not enough of an ideologue. That is why I am asking you what ideology you believe Obama was an ideologue of.

So which ideology was it?
 
No I don't. I don't think Obama was an ideologue. I also know people who have complained that Obama was not enough of an ideologue. That is why I am asking you what ideology you believe Obama was an ideologue of.

So which ideology was it?
Pecking...
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT