ADVERTISEMENT

A Fitting Tribute

Nothing claimed about it.
Yes, claimed is the correct word. With that said, I'll drop the "claimed" word if this will help you stop dodging the simple questions I asked you.

Again, If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
 
Yes, claimed is the correct word. With that said, I'll drop the "claimed" word if this will help you stop dodging the simple questions I asked you.

Again, If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
Dude, why do you defend Nazis?
And Anteefa?
What is it that attracts you to such violence and hatred and white supremacy?
 
Dude, why do you defend Nazis?
And Anteefa?
What is it that attracts you to such violence and hatred and white supremacy?
Again, same questiona for you, if one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
 
Still waiting on you to answer the questions I asked of you.

It is hilarious watching you right-wing nutjobs dodge and deflect simple questions asked of you.
An Azov sympathizer calling opponents right wing nut jobs. Goebbels would be proud.
 
An Azov sympathizer calling opponents right wing nut jobs. Goebbels would be proud.
Still waiting on your answers to these two simple questions . . .

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?

btw, Goebbels would be very proud of you since you embrace his own tactics.
 
I doubt the innocent civilians who burned to death in Dresden or were incinerated at Hiroshima or Nagasaki would agree with you. I respectfully ask you to explain the moral difference between the murderous actions unleashed by the governments of which you disapprove and those who enjoy your approval.
They started a war. We ended it. End of story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
The state that ruled them started the war. It’s what every state eventually gets around to.
Still waiting on your answers too . . .
Again, should your historical interpretation of Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki be taught in an American history class alongside the commonly accepted interpretation of these historical events? Or would such teaching be anti-American socialistic (or anti-American anarchist) indoctrination of students
And your point? Did we have a stateless society in 1941 or 1945?

Also, how do you know what a stateless society would look like or how it would operate?
 
The state that ruled them started the war. It’s what every state eventually gets around to.
And they were all for it, so long as it was Poles, Czechs, Russians, Chinese, and Koreans who were being slaughtered.

Regardless, the countless GI’s who were poised to invade Japan would undoubtedly agree with me. My loyalties lie with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Wait as long as you want, Counselor. I’m under no obligation to jump at your commands.
So you have no answers.

Clearly even you recognize your own hypocrisy and inconsistencies.

Good to know. Thanks for admitting it.
 
Those attracted to such groups as Antifa and the Nazi Azov Battalion love barking out orders.
Still nothing huh? . . .

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
 
So you have no answers.

Clearly even you recognize your own hypocrisy and inconsistencies.

Good to know. Thanks for admitting it.
I wonder if you seriously think when you make comments like this you are persuading anyone that you are winning a point. You are not, Counselor. You just look stupid. Hell, maybe you are stupid.
 
I wonder if you seriously think when you make comments like this you are persuading anyone that you are winning a point. You are not, Counselor. You just look stupid. Hell, maybe you are stupid.
All I'm doing now is applying your own logic back upon you. When someone refuses to answer your questions, you claim they are dodging the truth and that their continued refusal to answer the questions shows how they are conceding the point.

What, your own logic doesn't apply to you now old man?🤣🤣

Your hypocrisy and inconsistencies have been exposed once again on this thread. @ClintonDavidScott once again owned you. Put that in your stupid pipe and smoke it.
 
All I'm doing now is applying your own logic back upon you. When someone refuses to answer your questions, you claim they are dodging the truth and that their continued refusal to answer the questions shows how they are conceding the point.

What, your own logic doesn't apply to you now old man?🤣🤣

Your hypocrisy and inconsistencies have been exposed once again on this thread. @ClintonDavidScott once again owned you. Put that in your stupid pipe and smoke it.

You haven’t got wood on the ball all day.

I doubt you know what that means.

Let me know if I need to mansplain that for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
Still nothing huh? . . .

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
Apples 🍎. Oranges 🍊.
 
Apples 🍎. Oranges 🍊.
Again,

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
 
Again,

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology?

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States?
The United States fought a civil war to end slavery, and hundreds of thousands of men paid the ultimate price to see it through.

What has Ukraine done to rid itself of Nazis?
 
I wonder if you seriously think when you make comments like this you are persuading anyone that you are winning a point. You are not, Counselor. You just look stupid. Hell, maybe you are stupid.
Why so angry/bitter Danny? Are you not up to answering some simple questions in a forum dedicated to discussing political opinions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: my_2cents
Is a stateless society actually possible in your opinion, has one ever existed in human history? Serious questions.
I essentially asked him the same question.

He keeps talking about how a stateless society would have responded to these events compared to a society containing states, but he has yet to articulate how he knows what a stateless society would look like or how it would operate.
 
I essentially asked him the same question.

He keeps talking about how a stateless society would have responded to these events compared to a society containing states, but he has yet to articulate how he knows what a stateless society would look like or how it would operate.
The "Aristotelean Libertarian Anarchists" end up sounding like the Utopian Communists - "it just hasn't been done right yet"...
 
  • Like
Reactions: my_2cents
The United States fought a civil war to end slavery, and hundreds of thousands of men paid the ultimate price to see it through.

What has Ukraine done to rid itself of Nazis?
And yet we still have Americans who defend the Confederacy and fly their battle flag with pride. See how this works?

So, just answer the questions I asked with a simple yes or no answer.

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology? (Yes or no?)

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States? (Yes or no?)
 
The "Aristotelean Libertarian Anarchists" end up sounding like the Utopian Communists - "it just hasn't been done right yet"...
Well, you’re close but not quite there. One can’t say anarchism hasn’t been done right yet; one can only say anarchism hasn’t been tried. To be honest, David, you’ve been a disappointment on this thread. I thought you might be the only one who would listen to the lecture since you’ve claimed such a deep interest and understanding of all things philosophical.
 
Well, you’re close but not quite there. One can’t say anarchism hasn’t been done right yet; one can only say anarchism hasn’t been tried. To be honest, David, you’ve been a disappointment on this thread. I thought you might be the only one who would listen to the lecture since you’ve claimed such a deep interest and understanding of all things philosophical.
Sorry to disappoint you Dan, but Lew Rockwell has such a history of dishonest/racist writing that I won't give him my click.
 
  • Like
Reactions: my_2cents
The "Aristotelean Libertarian Anarchists" end up sounding like the Utopian Communists - "it just hasn't been done right yet"...
Dang David, you revealed where I was headed next with his reasoning.🤣🤣 That is if he ever could bring himself to actually answer some simple questions lol.

But yeah, you are exactly right. Anarchists (Aristotelean Libertarian or however else they want to label their absurdity) and Utopian Communists do often sound very much alike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
And yet we still have Americans who defend the Confederacy and fly their battle flag with pride. See how this works?

So, just answer the questions I asked with a simple yes or no answer.

If one supports the right of Ukraine to defend itself against a Russian invasion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical connections between the Azov Battalion and extreme right-wing ideology? (Yes or no?)

Better yet, if one supports the right of the United States to defend itself against a Mexican invansion, does this automatically mean that one supports the historical acceptance of slavery and racism in parts of the United States? (Yes or no?)
"And yet we still have Americans who defend the Confederacy and fly their battle flag with pride. See how this works?"

Do these "Confederates" have their own unit of the National Guard officially recognized by their national government?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LAY THE WOODY
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT