ADVERTISEMENT

Trump redesigning Airforce One...

More homoeroticism lol...no wonder you and Brad get along so well haha
You think me wiping my ass with you is homo? I have no desire to hear what kind of "movies" you have watched to think that. I hope you keep your door locked so your mommy doesn't see you watching that shit...
 
You think me wiping my ass with you is homo? I have no desire to hear what kind of "movies" you have watched to think that. I hope you keep your door locked so your mommy doesn't see you watching that shit...

I think it's safe to say, it ain't Marilyn Chambers smoking pole.
 
You mean you get this stoned on beer by itself?
It's possible. When I worked for CBP many Jamaicans came into the US carrying a couple of bottles of "wine". They used glass Dr. Pepper or similar bottles to bring their homemade "wine" into the US. We passed that stuff through routinely. One day an officer at another port of entry decided to do a test on the contents. The detector device reacted positive. The bottle was full of liquid THC. Apparently, they put the MJ in large drums with the homemade wine and heated it to extract the THC. We were told they put a couple of drops on their cigarettes and got the buzz when they smoked.
 
00-holding-hilary-clinton.jpg


Inside-Donald-Trumps-private-jet.jpg



Inside-Trump-Force-One-Donald-Trumps-Private-Boeing-757.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
I am going to take a step back a little..........my initial post was half joking, I didn;t expect to get into an argument over something so basic.........
First off, it does not matter who designed the patterns on AF1 the USAF will take those and make them as subdued as possible..........the proof is common sense, the question why wouldn't they? AF1 has enough ECM and threat warning systems , along with carrying chaff and flares that they can defeat any known surface to air or air to air threat electronically.........the threat it is most vulnerable too would be visual. You have the most important person in the free world on the aircraft, why wouldn't we make it as hard to see as possible?.its is simple to do...you make it blue and white.............if it is changed to red, white and blue, the USAF will take those colors and make them as subdued as possible, but it is pretty hard with red.........look at the aircraft he is taking today ( yes it is still AF1 because he is on it) 100% blue on bottom and white on top very hard to see at altitude
 
  • Like
Reactions: CSCOTTOSUPOKES
I am going to take a step back a little..........my initial post was half joking, I didn;t expect to get into an argument over something so basic.........
First off, it does not matter who designed the patterns on AF1 the USAF will take those and make them as subdued as possible..........the proof is common sense, the question why wouldn't they? AF1 has enough ECM and threat warning systems , along with carrying chaff and flares that they can defeat any known surface to air or air to air threat electronically.........the threat it is most vulnerable too would be visual. You have the most important person in the free world on the aircraft, why wouldn't we make it as hard to see as possible?.its is simple to do...you make it blue and white.............if it is changed to red, white and blue, the USAF will take those colors and make them as subdued as possible, but it is pretty hard with red.........look at the aircraft he is taking today ( yes it is still AF1 because he is on it) 100% blue on bottom and white on top very hard to see at altitude
Hot pink is ****ing hard to see at 36,000 ft too.
 
I am going to take a step back a little..........my initial post was half joking, I didn;t expect to get into an argument over something so basic.........
First off, it does not matter who designed the patterns on AF1 the USAF will take those and make them as subdued as possible..........the proof is common sense, the question why wouldn't they? AF1 has enough ECM and threat warning systems , along with carrying chaff and flares that they can defeat any known surface to air or air to air threat electronically.........the threat it is most vulnerable too would be visual. You have the most important person in the free world on the aircraft, why wouldn't we make it as hard to see as possible?.its is simple to do...you make it blue and white.............if it is changed to red, white and blue, the USAF will take those colors and make them as subdued as possible, but it is pretty hard with red.........look at the aircraft he is taking today ( yes it is still AF1 because he is on it) 100% blue on bottom and white on top very hard to see at altitude

Except the COLORS...as designed by Loewy and the Kennedys...don’t seem to have been changed by the USAF in any way.

I appreciate you backing off your original statements what little you have, but my historical research still reflects the USAF wasn’t involved in the original color scheme in any way nor “took” them and made them more subdued. My research has left me believing the Air Force wasn’t involved in coming up with or altering the color at all.

So my question is: Do you have any citations to authority (other than yourself) that indicates Air Force involvement or changing of the color scheme from Lowey’s And the Kennedy’s.

TIA.
 
Last edited:
Except the COLORS...as designed by Loewy and the Kennedys...doesn’t seem to have changed by the USAF in any way.

I appreciate you backing off your original statements what little you have, but my historical research still reflects the USAF wasn’t involved in the original color scheme in any way nor “took” them and made them more subdued. My research has left me believing the Air Force wasn’t involved in coming up with or altering the color at all.

So my question is: Do you have any citations to authority (other than yourself) that indicates Air Force involvement or changing of the color scheme from Lowey’s And the Kennedy’s.

TIA.
I think you know the answer to this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
Except the COLORS...as designed by Loewy and the Kennedys...don’t seem to have been changed by the USAF in any way.

I appreciate you backing off your original statements what little you have, but my historical research still reflects the USAF wasn’t involved in the original color scheme in any way nor “took” them and made them more subdued. My research has left me believing the Air Force wasn’t involved in coming up with or altering the color at all.

So my question is: Do you have any citations to authority (other than yourself) that indicates Air Force involvement or changing of the color scheme from Lowey’s And the Kennedy’s.

TIA.

Fundamental rule of cross examination...never ask a question you don’t know the answer to.

Maybe...but I did ask very nicely. So if he does run and hide, he can’t claim because I was insulting him or anything like that...and I will have my answer.

*has convinced himself he’s right via a 5-minute google search and no expertise whatsoever in the subject*

Lol...keep digging please.
 
I think I’m finally tired of you. There’s no laws of physics with you. You just leap back and forth using reality as a temporary station and one that seems to annoy you when you do get caught up in it. Good luck Clinton.

Well......bye lol. “50 points higher”
 
I think I’m finally tired of you. There’s no laws of physics with you. You just leap back and forth using reality as a temporary station and one that seems to annoy you when you do get caught up in it. Good luck Clinton.

Are you still a self-proclaimed birther btw?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT