Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so in the future shoukd we expect judges to hire lawyers before banging the hammer?
Totally normal.
cue up the little kid running into them backing out of the room gif
sully musta had his file read to him
when he commenced this amicus tac
Strikes me as odd. But I'm not a lawyer or judge.
Shouldn't a judge have a grasp of material that seemingly prompted his actions?
Strikes me as odd. But I'm not a lawyer or judge.
Shouldn't a judge have a grasp of material that seemingly prompted his actions?
He’s totally corrupt! Everyone knows it, but the lawyer’s will twist this into being totally normal! This doesn’t or shouldn’t happen! Dude is a scum bag that’s been bought and paid for. He needs to be disbarred and tossed in jailStrikes me as odd. But I'm not a lawyer or judge.
Shouldn't a judge have a grasp of material that seemingly prompted his actions?
That's interesting.A man who represents himself, has a fool for a client. - attributed to A. Lincoln.
It’s actually extremely common for judicial rulings to be defended by lawyers other than the Judge that made the ruling....almost universal, in fact.
A man who represents himself, has a fool for a client. - attributed to A. Lincoln.
It’s actually extremely common for judicial rulings to be defended by lawyers other than the Judge that made the ruling....almost universal, in fact.
This guy knows nothing! Everything is on the up and up in this case. Couple of our resident lawyers will disagree because they totally outclass him in the knowledge of our laws.
It’s actually extremely common for judicial rulings
Judge that made the ruling....
this is about a judicial ruling
and
a judge that made the ruling
what am i missing?
the need for representation seems we have traveled outside of that spectrum
This guy knows nothing! Everything is on the up and up in this case. Couple of our resident lawyers will disagree because they totally outclass him in the knowledge of our laws.
Do you lawyers/attorneys think the judge has been fair and balanced in this case? Yes or no answer.
Most....arguably all in some form or manner.....civil and criminal....appeals and writs are about a judicial ruling and a judge that made a ruling.
They are routinely argued by lawyers other than the trial judge that made the ruling which is being appealed.
I’m not sure what you are missing.
Actually I am....that’s not in the script you’re following.
Most....arguably all in some form or manner.....civil and criminal....appeals and writs are about a judicial ruling and a judge that made a ruling.
They are routinely argued by lawyers other than the trial judge that made the ruling which is being appealed.
I’m not sure what you are missing.
Actually I am....that’s not in the script you’re following.
for clarity
i just finished coffee with an eighty year old esteemed attorney
I mean....
Trumpesphere has an agenda. Who knew?
Believe who you want though. *shoulder shrug*
Trumpesphere in this case is a former assistant US Attorney
Point being - there’s always another lawyer saying they know what’s up. And nothing about this entire case seems normal.
Most....arguably all in some form or manner.....civil and criminal....appeals and writs are about a judicial ruling and a judge that made a ruling.
They are routinely argued by lawyers other than the trial judge that made the ruling which is being appealed.
I’m not sure what you are missing.
Actually I am....that’s not in the script you’re following.
Look in the mirror! Love how you act like you are not biased...a total joke. Your TDS shows daily and you make excuses for liberals/Democrats all the time. Kinda embarrassingYou.
Are you implying you call balls and strikes better than Andrew McCarthy?I mean....
Trumpesphere has an agenda. Who knew?
Believe who you want though. *shoulder shrug*
Most....arguably all in some form or manner.....civil and criminal....appeals and writs are about a judicial ruling and a judge that made a ruling.
They are routinely argued by lawyers other than the trial judge that made the ruling which is being appealed.
I’m not sure what you are missing.
Actually I am....that’s not in the script you’re following.
How many of these did Appeals Courts specifically order the Judge, himself, to respond to Court itself?Cool.
Believe who you want. *shoulder shrug*
Or maybe take a look at the millions of appeals of judges’ rulings and the multitudes of extraordinary writs directed at judges’ rulings filed and see how many of those have the Judge actually responding personally. *another shoulder shrug*.
Former US Attorney for Sourhern District of NY probably knows what he's talking about.I mean....
Trumpesphere has an agenda. Who knew?
Believe who you want though. *shoulder shrug*
Former US Attorney for Sourhern District of NY probably knows what he's talking about.
I'm asking for clarification what qualifies being part of the "Trumprsphere," is it a binary or metric measurement (degrees to Trumpeshperic), and what is the defining threshold at which those afflicted no longer possess the ability to call balls and strikes.God forbid that I would come to JD’s defense. In the first place I doubt he feels the need for anyone to come to his aid. And secondly, if he did feel such need I’m certain I’m the last person he would want.
That being said, I believe most of you are making a mountain out of a molehill out of what he is saying. JD is arguing one microscopic point: judges frequently hire lawyers to explain their rulings. He is making no judgement on the correctness of this judge’s ruling, just pointing out that judges hiring lawyers is commonplace.
Nothing in JD’s comments points to an iota of TDS. Nothing he has said implies he agrees with the judge’s ruling. He is simply explaining something that is commonplace within the legal process, a commonplace that most of us had no idea existed. I know I didn’t.
So I would suggest that some of you calm down with your exhortations. Not everything is a pro-Trump/anti-Trump situation. IMO JD was doing nothing more than trying to educate us on legalistic practices about which none of us were aware.
Further, while JD may be accurate in his original response, in this specific situation is he leaving out broader context which may or may not support/refute the original impulse for this thread?.I mean....
Trumpesphere has an agenda. Who knew?
Believe who you want though. *shoulder shrug*
You’ll get no argument from me that JD’s style is arrogant and antagonistic. He seems to find entertainment by insulting one who disagrees with him. He did so in this thread by invoking the “Trumpesphere.”I'm asking for clarification what qualifies being part of the "Trumprsphere," is it a binary or metric measurement (degrees to Trumpeshperic), and what is the defining threshold at which those afflicted no longer possess the ability to call balls and strikes.
Further, while JD may be accurate in his original response, in this specific situation is he leaving out broader context which may or may not support/refute the original impulse for this thread?.