I have never posted that this is the end of Trump. This is just another piece of the puzzle, and a significant one at that.
The investigation continues...
Still waiting for Russian collusion evidence.
- Thread starter Headhunter
- Start date
I have never posted that this is the end of Trump. This is just another piece of the puzzle, and a significant one at that.
The investigation continues...
LOL. Take a gander at what both parties are defending in 2018 and get back with me CNN97.
A hearty golf clap to you on the moral victories.
I have. And like I posted, losing support in very safe Republican districts isn't a positive sign for Republicans heading into 2018.
Maybe Weiner and Hillary were sexting and exchanging photos over the email system? Weiner's wife worked for Hillary, maybe that is what she was hiding.
I mean seriously, who would touch Hillary? Perhaps all the Weiner she could get was in electronic format.
I mean seriously, who would touch Hillary? Perhaps all the Weiner she could get was in electronic format.
Sort of like:
- Trump and Putin are buddies = Collusion
- Actually, Trump has some Russian business connections = Collusion
- Well, no connections or coordination but Trump Jr. was excited to get some dirt on Hillary from somebody in Russia = Collusion
So, changing the definition of collusion allows the media narrative to remain the same.
You're gonna need to refine your definition of "gone to war in Syria" then.
If "gone to war in Syria" doesn't mean "dedicating resources to a war in Syria".
If you have citizens in a war in Syria, you have gone to war in Syria.
Not always.
Oft times investigations result in no charges.
Just saying.
If you have dedicated resources to a war in Syria....you have gone to war in Syria.
Like we went to war in Iraq.
I guess it comes down to your definition of what "like" is. Sure there are distinctions....but if there were no distinctions it would be "exactly" how we went to war in Iraq rather than "like".
Dang. I'm glad your Chihuahua and I are friends. And you have no idea who I actually am. Or at least I think you don't. Don't answer that. It's rhetorical. I don't need more nightmares.
Hopefully they aren't idiots when it comes to leadership. Having seen both of their priorities, it looks like this is what the Oklahoma Legislature needs. Shorty was a complete mess (in addition to his pedo shit) and desperately wanted to make sure there were no babies in my food (WTF?!?).
windriverrange said: ↑
He was the president of the United States but at no time was that carp sucker "my" president.
GL97
"He was your President just as Trump is my President."
So Trump is your president...good to know! I'm assuming now that when your traveling the world and someone disparages him, you defend him correct. Because he IS your president.
He was the president of the United States but at no time was that carp sucker "my" president.
GL97
"He was your President just as Trump is my President."
So Trump is your president...good to know! I'm assuming now that when your traveling the world and someone disparages him, you defend him correct. Because he IS your president.
I'm not the one that has to define anything about going to war in Syria because I didn't bring up the Syrian civil war. Hence the reason I was seeking clarification from the poster who did.
Wow, talk about stating the obvious, lol. Thanks for this profound observation.
You are trying too hard again btw. But hey, at least your lapdog Meds is impressed.
Nope, I don't defend his policies or a lot of his actions. And political, I oppose his agenda. Which Americans are allowed to do, since we don't live under a dictator.
That doesn't mean though he isn't my President though. I respect the office of the Presidency and he is the current President.
Nope. You sought clarification about what he meant by babies. It is you that advanced the positive proposition that we have never gone to war in either in Syria or Libya like we did in Iraq.
Yep, babies referring back to Syria and Libya in the context of a discussion about Bush and the Iraq war.
Again, I was seeking clarification. And you went off on some crazy rabbit chase as usual.
I did and that is a true statement.
Anything else?
And thus we are right back to my original statement.
If you advance the positive proposition (and assert that it is a true statement) that we have never gone to war in Syria or Libya like we have in Iraq, you would be well served in defining the terms in your own proposition.
Namely clarifying the very subjective term/measure "like".
lol, oh my goodness.
From Oxford:
like: having the same characteristic or qualities as; similar to; in the same way that; as
We did not go to war in Syria and Libya like we did in Iraq.
What next, I need to define "not" for you?
lol, oh my goodness.
Heck fire, I'm bored...I'll play along.
From Oxford:
like: having the same characteristic or qualities as; similar to; in the same way that; as
We did not go to war in Syria and Libya like we did in Iraq.
What next, I need to define "not" for you?
So no similarities in how we went to and are presently at war in Syria and how we did in Iraq.
None at all.
That is your proposition.
Which is clearly not accurate or truthful.
My proposition is simply what is has always been: We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya like we did in Iraq. A completely true and accurate statement.
Sit down counselor, you are floundering.
Using the definition of like you provided, this absolutely is your proposition.
The more you frantically tell people they are floundering or trying too hard, the more everyone realizes you are the one floundering and grasping at straws.
Keep yapping little puppy.
lol...this coming from a poster who has engaged in similar action and who can't simply accept a true statement and move on.
But hey, you want to keep digging your hole...so be it...
We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya (like) we did in Iraq.
We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya (in the same characteristic or quality as) we did in Iraq.
We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya (similarly as) we did in Iraq.
We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya (in the same way that) we did in Iraq.
We have never gone to war in Syria or Libya (as) we did in Iraq.
All true and accurate statements.
Finally your exit strategy.
Man you would be a hoot to go against in the courtroom!
Good times.
I have conclusively established the falsity of your claim to anyone with a lick of sense.
No need to continue repeating it.
Keep yapping puppy. It's entertaining.
lol, legend in your own mind huh? Hey, if it makes you feel better....
You are right, this is entertaining.
Putin getting a helluva ROI for his election collusion in favor of Trump:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...system-romania-putin-we-will-be-forced-respon
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...system-romania-putin-we-will-be-forced-respon
Last edited:
You're a borderline sociopath short-order cook, who is really shitty at predicting elections and NBA Northwest Division standings.
Just for clarification's sake.
