MAGA, and Drain the Swamp, and all that jazz....
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...TNA8vbspJHoVgPOHPmNIwgeOitFE3RyWOgJiMx7kvqBf8
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...TNA8vbspJHoVgPOHPmNIwgeOitFE3RyWOgJiMx7kvqBf8
Sounds about right.
- Thread starter Been Jammin
- Start date
Every day its more shitty government, thug behavior, and lies. Oh to have a decent man like Obama at the help that takes the job seriously.
Good thing we followed Obama up with a guy who would make America great again and drain the swamp.
stay woke beeny
https://www.hcn.org/issues/50.7/dep...e-do-with-the-extra-2.5-billion-in-his-budget
Since his confirmation in March 2017, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s push to trim the department he oversees while opening more public lands to energy development has been lauded by Republicans and denounced by Democrats. When it came to the budget, however, both sides agreed on one thing: No big cuts. In the omnibus federal budget, which recently passed with solid bipartisan support, Congress decided the Department of Interior was worth nearly $2.5 billion more than the administration had proposed.
In defense of Trump voters, the Democrats did have Hillary as the other option.
What do you think a Hillary presidency would have produced? Cures for all cancers, an end to poverty and world hunger, and the most pristinely accountable government in history?
He couldn’t know that. His expertise spans 2015-present.
So far, rebuttals have ranged from "But, Obama" to "But, Hilary" Sounds about right.
You do know that Clinton was the other option, right? If so, you shouldn't be afraid of answering what you thought her presidency would be like.
I haven't thought about it. Maybe you should start a thread on the topic, rather than hijacking this one.
This thread had nothing to do with that. The Hillary whataboutism is typical righty deflection. You have any thoughts on the OP? If so, you shouldn’t be afraid to address them instead of deflecting, No?
there’s a 2.5B swamp draining rebuttal in there complete with citation somewheres
but tds vaginahat wailtardflakes skip right over those sorta details
Gosh with all this swamp draining and money saving, why on earth would trump already admit defeat with national debt?
Some might reasonably respond that proposing $330 million cuts to the Land and Water Conservation Fund and $570 million to BIA Education plans ain’t exactly swamp draining, but more akin to swamp filling on behalf of corporate cronies.
Mission: The U.S. Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated Island Communities.
Fair enough, but I was responding to this post with the reality of what the options were in the general election.
My point is both choices were bad so it's difficult to follow up a terrible president with a good or great president when both choices were bad.
The problem with climate change science is it aims the derision at the wrong people.
People like Been post something like this opinion piece as an I told you.
Told who thought, the people with the most minimal impact in the industrialized world.
Good target.
People like Been post something like this opinion piece as an I told you.
Told who thought, the people with the most minimal impact in the industrialized world.
Good target.
When the article tells me where the difference between Trumps proposed cuts came from and what they were appropriated, I’ll be more than happy to comment.
Not that I’d be trying to convince you otherwise or expecting you to agree.
Sounds like you definitely have your mind made up.
I’m good with that.
Of course, I didn’t claim 2.5B in cuts is necessarily bad. Just indicate we probably need to look at what the cuts actually are before declaring swamp drained, case closed.
Similar threads
