MAGA, and Drain the Swamp, and all that jazz....
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...TNA8vbspJHoVgPOHPmNIwgeOitFE3RyWOgJiMx7kvqBf8
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...TNA8vbspJHoVgPOHPmNIwgeOitFE3RyWOgJiMx7kvqBf8
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MAGA, and Drain the Swamp, and all that jazz....
https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...TNA8vbspJHoVgPOHPmNIwgeOitFE3RyWOgJiMx7kvqBf8
Good thing we followed Obama up with a guy who would make America great again and drain the swamp.
stay woke beeny
https://www.hcn.org/issues/50.7/dep...e-do-with-the-extra-2.5-billion-in-his-budget
Since his confirmation in March 2017, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s push to trim the department he oversees while opening more public lands to energy development has been lauded by Republicans and denounced by Democrats. When it came to the budget, however, both sides agreed on one thing: No big cuts. In the omnibus federal budget, which recently passed with solid bipartisan support, Congress decided the Department of Interior was worth nearly $2.5 billion more than the administration had proposed.
In defense of Trump voters, the Democrats did have Hillary as the other option.Good thing we followed Obama up with a guy who would make America great again and drain the swamp.
In defense of Trump voters, the Democrats did have Hillary as the other option.
What do you think a Hillary presidency would have produced? Cures for all cancers, an end to poverty and world hunger, and the most pristinely accountable government in history?
Cures for all cancers, an end to poverty and world hunger, and the most pristinely accountable government in history?
In defense of Trump voters, the Democrats did have Hillary as the other option.
What do you think a Hillary presidency would have produced? Cures for all cancers, an end to poverty and world hunger, and the most pristinely accountable government in history?
So far, rebuttals have ranged from "But, Obama" to "But, Hilary" Sounds about right.
So far, rebuttals have ranged from "But, Obama" to "But, Hilary" Sounds about right.
You do know that Clinton was the other option, right? If so, you shouldn't be afraid of answering what you thought her presidency would be like.So far, rebuttals have ranged from "But, Obama" to "But, Hilary" Sounds about right.
You do know that Clinton was the other option, right? If so, you shouldn't be afraid of answering what you thought her presidency would be like.
You do know that Clinton was the other option, right? If so, you shouldn't be afraid of answering what you thought her presidency would be like.
So far, rebuttals have ranged from "But, Obama" to "But, Hilary" Sounds about right.
there’s a 2.5B swamp draining rebuttal in there complete with citation somewheres
but tds vaginahat wailtardflakes skip right over those sorta details
there’s a 2.5B swamp draining rebuttal in there complete with citation somewheres
but tds vaginahat wailtardflakes skip right over those sorta details
Some might reasonably respond that proposing $330 million cuts to the Land and Water Conservation Fund and $570 million to BIA Education plans ain’t exactly swamp draining, but more akin to swamp filling on behalf of corporate cronies.
Fair enough, but I was responding to this post with the reality of what the options were in the general election.I haven't thought about it. Maybe you should start a thread on the topic, rather than hijacking this one.
Good thing we followed Obama up with a guy who would make America great again and drain the swamp.
Fair enough, but I was responding to this post with the reality of what the options were in the general election.
My point is both choices were bad so it's difficult to follow up a terrible president with a good or great president when both choices were bad.
Some might reasonably respond that proposing $330 million cuts to the Land and Water Conservation Fund and $570 million to BIA Education plans ain’t exactly swamp draining, but more akin to swamp filling on behalf of corporate cronies.
you’re up to a billion
1.5 to go
When the article tells me where the difference between Trumps proposed cuts came from and what they were appropriated, I’ll be more than happy to comment.
Not that I’d be trying to convince you otherwise or expecting you to agree.
as well as what BIA education plans entail
but i digress 2.5B in cuts is bad
Of course, I didn’t claim 2.5B in cuts is necessarily bad. Just indicate we probably need to look at what the cuts actually are before declaring swamp drained, case closed.