If our leaders use your method of evaluating the program, we will continue our slide into irrelevancy, insignificance.
And if you’re going to make qualifying statements about Brands, I think you should include the idea that many think possible….that Pat Smith was largely responsible for our four year run, 2003-2006. Doesn’t it seem odd that after winning four in a row and Pat resigns a few months after the last one in 2006, we finish 5th, 5th, 15th the following three years. (something like that) That clearly is some kind of indicator…don’t you think?
And didn’t John win in his second or third year? I’m pretty sure some of our individual champions that year started with Joe Seay. By your evaluation methods, with Brands type qualifiers, perhaps John hasn't won any NCAA championships. Now I’m being facetious, or am I?!
One more thing…..if, as you mention above (the coaches winning the NCAA), that was over a twenty year period, we’d all be pretty darn happy and that would be acceptable. In other words if Sanderson had won 10, Smith 5, Brands 4, Ryan 1 all spread out evenly over the last 20 years….but that’s not what has happened. We are becoming irrelevant.
And if you’re going to make qualifying statements about Brands, I think you should include the idea that many think possible….that Pat Smith was largely responsible for our four year run, 2003-2006. Doesn’t it seem odd that after winning four in a row and Pat resigns a few months after the last one in 2006, we finish 5th, 5th, 15th the following three years. (something like that) That clearly is some kind of indicator…don’t you think?
And didn’t John win in his second or third year? I’m pretty sure some of our individual champions that year started with Joe Seay. By your evaluation methods, with Brands type qualifiers, perhaps John hasn't won any NCAA championships. Now I’m being facetious, or am I?!
One more thing…..if, as you mention above (the coaches winning the NCAA), that was over a twenty year period, we’d all be pretty darn happy and that would be acceptable. In other words if Sanderson had won 10, Smith 5, Brands 4, Ryan 1 all spread out evenly over the last 20 years….but that’s not what has happened. We are becoming irrelevant.