And just like the board's preeminent dishonest liar, accuses the other side of exactly what the right wingers did. They all had the cult narrative down instantly -- just as you'd expect, too, since the GOP has had the insurrection shoved up their ass for over a year, they call THIS an insurrection, lol. They're so predictable.
No doubt in my mind it was orchestrated. It didn't take 12 hours, it took 12 seconds. They had the talking points in hand before Politico dropped it.
Thanks, Brad. Have you found any teenage girls getting an abortion yet? You can get a nice bounty and maybe even get a pass into the delivery room so you can make sure she gives birth.
You can define all seven components of critical thinking. The board's slow 8 cannot.
Is abortion the hill the commucrats are willing to die on? Seems like they are all in on abortions Being banned. O wait, the states can still make the decision about the legality of abortion. Just like pot, same sex marriage and alcohol.
In fact some states can deregulate and go into the third trimester. As appalling as that is to me, the states have a right to decide how far they are willing to go.
I **** responsibly you ****ing dick sucker
If it's not an inflatable doll, can you?
Here is the difference with Brown and Plessy. Plessy gave states the ability to discriminate against racial minorities. It gave states the ability to pass racial segregation laws. Brown overturned that horrible decision by upholding the rights of all racial minorities in the United States.
That is exactly what I want to do. That is why I don't allow my personal religious views to trump the Constitution. Hence the reason the board's confederate follows me around and attacks my religious faith all the time. He is mad that in matters of governance and the state, I stand on the side of the Constitution and not on forcing my personal religious views upon all Americans.
Why should Democrats not respond to such a potential decision? Such a decision is completely out of step with what a large majority of Americans support and the Constitution. Democrats have every right to hold Republicans politically responsible for such a potential decision.
A large majority of the American people make it clear over and over again that they don't want Roe overturned. Are you and other Republicans listening to them?
They are allowing states to make abortions illegal, even in the instances of rape and incest.
Sure. I'm an anonymous poster on an internet board, not the POTUS. Imagine a potus that talked like that. Why, he'd probably lose the next election, wouldn't he?
States can't make the decision about same sex marriage. However, given the legal reasoning of this draft opinion, there is no reason to think these five reactionary justices wouldn't overturn Obergefell too.
It is hilarious watching Republicans getting upset that the American people have been made aware of what Alito thinks about Roe v. Wade and that the possible attempt to overturn Roe by five reactionary justices broke a few months too early.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The SCOTUS leak will be 100% on liberal democrats in the hallways. The decision that SCOTUS takes (as I understand it) will be to push this to state to state decision. There is nothing unfair or unjust with this decision.
Was such reasoning unfair or unjust in the Plessy v. Ferguson decision?
In the same turn can one not say any state that favors abortion have something in common? I think you find it familiar to follow left wing dipshitz.
Do you not distinguish a difference in Plessy v Ferguson & Roe v Wade? There is a large portion of the USA that believes abortion is akin to murder. For certain the process of a human life is terminated. If you are in favor of abortion then at what point in the pregnancy is it NOT killing and when does it cross over to taking a human life? Abortion pro or con is a very difficult subject to defend.
Certainly a thought that should give anyone pause to thought.
So? There was a large portion of the USA that believed it was perfectly acceptable to discriminate against racial minorities and impose segregation laws.
I see no reason Jackson would've been given access to Alito's draft opinion. She is not part of the deliberations in this case nor is she officially part of the Supreme Court right now.
I guess they don't prohibit abortions like the backwards, poor, third world countries and our poorest states.
What if a janitor just took $10k in cash and there's no political consideration?
Uh, the anti-fossil fuel left is anti-woman but they’re too fûcking stupid to know why.
