Poor Jussie!!!
- Thread starter Medic007
- Start date
and ABC starts throwing around the
alleged word concerning jussie
maga kids and jussie are gonna change the way the ho’s do business
alleged word concerning jussie
maga kids and jussie are gonna change the way the ho’s do business
In lieu of a credible reply, give it the shunt treatment I guess.
Yeah mega, you are exactly the guy I want to discuss hate law statutes with. I'm sure that would be productive.
I'm not sure he didn't commit a hate crime and terrorism to boot. Just because you send something to yourself may not be a defense here
Highly predictable and transparent dodge aside, I’ll ask you some questions anyway.
do you think this liar would hesitate for a second to keep anyone else out of jail if someone who fit his fictional profile were wrongfully arrested and charged with assault against him?
Would he admit to making it up if those people were then charged with a hate crime?
Do you think he would accept responsibility for any retaliatory violence on his behalf against white Trump supporters?
His entire resource consuming lie was racially and politically targeted. So I ask you to quit smelling your own farts long enough to explain how this isn’t a hate crime?
For the record I think hate crimes themselves are a made up category defined completely by deducing what someone had in their mind when they created a regular non hate crime. I just think if one is going to play the hate crime card, one should expect to play by the same rules when it turns out to be bullshit.
The one he just made up for fake hate crimes reported to the police. I'm not sure that reporting fake hate crimes has been prevalent enough to make laws specifically against it. I'll check the FBI database.
Lay em out for me hate crime expert. And answer my questions please.
The thing is that he just didn't make up a crime, he physically mailed a death threat possibly meeting the criteria of a hate crime which also contained a powdered substance.
My question is does it make a difference if he was the addressee on the envelope? Because the act itself and the content of the threat probably meet the threshold
Just as I suspected. Charge him for a hate crime without even knowing if hate crime laws apply. I'll stick with mocking your stupidity rather than wasting time engaging. You can call me a smarmy fartsniffer in return. We'll both be happier
I bet you had a real intelligent conversation chambered but decided you needed to conserve your energy.
If it was heralded as a hate crime when we didn't know who did it, why wouldn't it still be now that we do?
I don’t see that any federal statute would apply because it requires use of a firearm, incendiary device or other dangerous weapon.
But look at the Illinois state hate crime law:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050K12-7.1.htm
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
You’d have to be creative here, but did the two brothers commit an assault and battery on Smollett because of his race? I mean, that’s what he wanted everybody to believe, right? If that could fly, then you’d have Smollett as an accessory to a felony.
It’s a bit of a stretch. But that’s your best chance that I could easily locate.
You mock my stupidity all you want. Doesn’t change the fact that you are a poser who resorts to smugness as a defense mechanism because you are just a nerd who learned to sound like you know more than you do.
Zero chance you have organic knowledge of hate crime statutes.
As well as trillion dollar industries, which is, like, all of them.
Kamala addresses the topic:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ka...trated-and-disappointed-after-smollett-arrest
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ka...trated-and-disappointed-after-smollett-arrest
Uh huh. I love how she avoided the embarrassing reality by her "hate crimes are on the rise" bit. There's no doubt she'll cling to the "but whitey" narrative to keep her narrative slurping progressive base appeased. It's only a matter of time before one of those sloths says that Jussie shouldn't be held accountable because "systemic racism."
I am, but only ironically. If you were as smart as you think you are you would know that.
Last edited:
You think you know smart one day the next day you think you know.
