You think you know smart one day the next day you think you know.
Damn it @SMemmett. I’ve earned a mulligan here!
You think you know smart one day the next day you think you know.
Just as I suspected. Charge him for a hate crime without even knowing if hate crime laws apply. I'll stick with mocking your stupidity rather than wasting time engaging. You can call me a smarmy fartsniffer in return. We'll both be happier
I'd argue he did commit a hate crime. The purpose of hate crime legislation is to recognize that the underlying premise of the crime is to threaten or attack an entire segment of a population and not just the specific individual involved. The faked attack against him wasn't just on him, but upon the entire gay/black community and thus a hate crime. His hoax crime was entirely premeditated on sewing fear and discord against ALL MAGA supporters (white guys in red hats) not just two random Chicago residents. Now MAGA supporters aren't a protected class, and frankly I don't know how much that is a requirement for a hate crime ruling, but the underlying premise imo is the same.
Shows how selectively the hate crime designation is applied based on a narrative.
The thing is that he just didn't make up a crime, he physically mailed a death threat possibly meeting the criteria of a hate crime which also contained a powdered substance.
My question is does it make a difference if he was the addressee on the envelope? Because the act itself and the content of the threat probably meet the threshold
His intent was to make it a hate crime. One cannot separate the letter he sent himself from the subsequent charade of the choreographed "assault" he participated in. The letter set the stage and the bogus assault was supposed to be the confirming action. Regardless of whether it was a hate crime or attempted hate crime it was definitely a terroristic act. The ground up tylenol in the cut/paste letter made it so. His statements, interviews and false police report were corroboration.I'd argue he did commit a hate crime. The purpose of hate crime legislation is to recognize that the underlying premise of the crime is to threaten or attack an entire segment of a population and not just the specific individual involved. The faked attack against him wasn't just on him, but upon the entire gay/black community and thus a hate crime. His hoax crime was entirely premeditated on sewing fear and discord against ALL MAGA supporters (white guys in red hats) not just two random Chicago residents. Now MAGA supporters aren't a protected class, and frankly I don't know how much that is a requirement for a hate crime ruling, but the underlying premise imo is the same.
I am, but only ironically. If you were as smart as you think you are you would know that.
Basically an intellectual white flag at this point.
Highly predictable and transparent dodge
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.I'd argue he did commit a hate crime. The purpose of hate crime legislation is to recognize that the underlying premise of the crime is to threaten or attack an entire segment of a population and not just the specific individual involved. The faked attack against him wasn't just on him, but upon the entire gay/black community and thus a hate crime. His hoax crime was entirely premeditated on sewing fear and discord against ALL MAGA supporters (white guys in red hats) not just two random Chicago residents. Now MAGA supporters aren't a protected class, and frankly I don't know how much that is a requirement for a hate crime ruling, but the underlying premise imo is the same.
and ABC starts throwing around the
alleged word concerning jussie
maga kids and jussie are gonna change the way the ho’s do business
fify.
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.I don't know the legal definition of intimidation as referenced in your statement, but he attempted to create a branding against all MAGA supporters that protrays them as violent, homophobic racists which certainly seems to be an attempt to intimidate others from aligning to that association.
disorderly conduct - he was charged with that. So, could amend the charges to include the hate crime.I don’t see that any federal statute would apply because it requires use of a firearm, incendiary device or other dangerous weapon.
But look at the Illinois state hate crime law:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050K12-7.1.htm
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
You’d have to be creative here, but did the two brothers commit an assault and battery on Smollett because of his race? I mean, that’s what he wanted everybody to believe, right? If that could fly, then you’d have Smollett as an accessory to a felony.
It’s a bit of a stretch. But that’s your best chance that I could easily locate.
I was just being ironicWhat a powerful statement, quoting me and offering nothing is response.
I don't know the legal definition of intimidation as referenced in your statement, but he attempted to create a branding against all MAGA supporters that protrays them as violent, homophobic racists which certainly seems to be an attempt to intimidate others from aligning to that association.
How can you tell? Was it because I didn't complain a bout a lack of a credible reply, the true sign of someone being ironic. Or maybe when someone didn't take my irony seriously I should have accused them of waving a white flag, that's the real irony. Let me prove my irony to you Mega, dismiss me, so that I can say that you are dodging.Not really.
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, choice in hat color, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
How can you tell? Was it because I didn't complain a bout a lack of a credible reply, the true sign of someone being ironic. Or maybe when someone didn't take my irony seriously I should have accused them of waving a white flag, that's the real irony. Let me prove my irony to you Mega, dismiss me, so that I can say that you are dodging.
Or make his character another victim in the Chicago murder scene.Empire needs to give Smollett the Henry Blake treatment.
Or make his character another victim in the Chicago murder scene.
Cmon bro, that would be a hat crime....Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, choice in hat color, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
Yes, as rare as poodles and Gucci loafers.Even in Hollywood, gay African American men are a rare breed.
Sec. 12-7.1. Hate crime.
(a) A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, choice in hat color, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in Sections 12-1, 12-2, 12-3(a), 12-7.3, 12-7.5, 16-1, 19-4, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 25-1, 26-1, 26.5-1, 26.5-2, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of Section 12-6, and paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) of Section 26.5-3 of this Code, respectively.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (b-5), hate crime is a Class 4 felony for a first offense and a Class 2 felony for a second or subsequent offense.
Actually, he was auditioning to be AOC's running mate for President. Two morons in a pod.They can't kill him off. They'll want him back if he can either exonerate himself or manage to get out of this with just a wrist-slap. Even in Hollywood, gay African American men are a rare breed.
Just Google it before you spout off.That's amazing that you typed this from memory without having to search for information you didn't have and didn't already know. Truly, your knowledge of statutes is without peer.
Just Google it before you spout off.
Do I though?For someone that asks so many questions (as answers), this is fresh.
Has any body discussed what a stupid name Jussie is?
Just Google it before you spout off.
probably why he didn't want to turn over his phone....