ADVERTISEMENT

On a scale of 1 to 10

Direct measure of irradiance started in 1978. We don't know everything about the sun and how it affects the climate but we've somehow figured out with absolute certainty that the earth will end in [checks notes] less than 8 years because of cars and cow farts. Isn't science awesome?

On that note, did you see that Joe Biden cured cancer today?
Should have cured dementia first. What a dumbass. 🤣😂
 
Probably not your lifespan, but definitely mine. We have had a decade of technological miracles since you last checked.


For comparison that 1200 GW is greater than the installed electrical generation capacity from all sources in the the US in 2020
Imagine being so concerned about climate change that you’re certain the Chinese will fix it.
 
The climate alarmists have a well earned well deserved reputation as pearl clutching, hyperventilating, hyperbolic pathological liars who call upon police state tactics when they can’t persuade. Whenever someone or some organization or a movement implores the government to “do something” to accomplish its goals via police power because their lies have been so egregious and so often, and their predictions are continually shown to be intentionally false, it/they should be ridiculed into oblivion. Anyone who answers with a number greater than zero has obviously not been paying attention.
 
More renewable capacity added in 2022 than coal capacity permitted.
US only. Which means we are pissing in the wind. You have a hose filling up a tub and we are taking water out a teaspoon at a time.

If you don’t solve the per capita standard of living in China and India with renewable energy, waste of time.

And let’s not act like renewable energy is clean. What about those batteries with solar? Go read about how much hydrocarbons it takes to build one wind turbine.

It takes 170 tons of coal to build one wind turbine.

“A two-megawatt windmill is made up of 260 tons of steel that required 300 tons of iron ore and 170 tons of coking coal, all mined, transported and produced by hydrocarbons. “A windmill could spin until it falls apart and never generate as much energy as was invested in building it.”


So easily duped.
 
US only. Which means we are pissing in the wind. You have a hose filling up a tub and we are taking water out a teaspoon at a time.

If you don’t solve the per capita standard of living in China and India with renewable energy, waste of time.
No those figures are from China not the US.
And let’s not act like renewable energy is clean. What about those batteries with solar? Go read about how much hydrocarbons it takes to build one wind turbine.

It takes 170 tons of coal to build one wind turbine.
Is that a lot compared to fossil fuel generation? Did you bother to look it up? (It's not) https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2021/06/whats-the-carbon-footprint-of-a-wind-turbine/
“A two-megawatt windmill is made up of 260 tons of steel that required 300 tons of iron ore and 170 tons of coking coal, all mined, transported and produced by hydrocarbons. “A windmill could spin until it falls apart and never generate as much energy as was invested in building it.”

From your very own link (from 7 years ago)

"Undoubtedly, a well-sited and well-built wind turbine would generate as much energy as it embodies in less than a year."
So easily duped.
Spiderman Pointing GIF by Regal
 
More
Over the whole live cycle is it better or worse? (It's better, by a lot)
More “green/climate alarmist” baloney. If the picture is as rosy as you pretend there would be countless organizations jumping on board without the need for any government participation, subsidy, loan guarantees and the like. That government is needed to ram “green propaganda” down our throats is all anyone needs to see to know it’s all a ruse.
 
More

More “green/climate alarmist” baloney. If the picture is as rosy as you pretend there would be countless organizations jumping on board without the need for any government participation, subsidy, loan guarantees and the like. That government is needed to ram “green propaganda” down our throats is all anyone needs to see to know it’s all a ruse.
Dan maybe you should familiarize yourself with countless organizations
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Dan maybe you should familiarize yourself with countless organizations
Do tell me about all the organizations involved in the industry that don’t have a hand out in expectation of a subsidy, tax break, loan guarantee, etc.

Explain the need the “greens” have to persuade the government to ban their fossil fuel competition, things like automobiles, water heaters, etc. if their utopia is right around the corner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Explain the need the “greens” have to persuade the government to ban their fossil fuel competition, things like automobiles, water heaters, etc. if their utopia is right around the corner.
That's how you grow an unprofitable business into a profitable one, Dan. The first GW is much more expensive than the last GW. How competitive would fossil fuels be if they had to pay for the all the externalities they create? The fact that they don't pay for those externalities is a massive subsidy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Over the whole live cycle is it better or worse? (It's better, by a lot)

Ehh, maybe. I could probably find some child miners that would argue against your point.

Let’s revisit when we know the impacts of end of life of the tek.
 
That's how you grow an unprofitable business into a profitable one, Dan. The first GW is much more expensive than the last GW. How competitive would fossil fuels be if they had to pay for the all the externalities they create? The fact that they don't pay for those externalities is a massive subsidy.
It didn't require government intervention to get people to switch from horses to cars as a primary mode of transportation. How many people riding horses do you see on the interstate these days?
 
That's how you grow an unprofitable business into a profitable one, Dan. The first GW is much more expensive than the last GW. How competitive would fossil fuels be if they had to pay for the all the externalities they create? The fact that they don't pay for those externalities is a massive subsidy.
Oh, I see. An unprofitable business can only become profitable by getting the government to ban the competition and also cover any negative externality using taxpayer funds. Sounds like something a socialist would think. Oh, wait …
 
Ehh, maybe. I could probably find some child miners that would argue against your point.

Let’s revisit when we know the impacts of end of life of the tek.
What, in your mind, are the children mining in order to make solar panels?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
It didn't require government intervention to get people to switch from horses to cars as a primary mode of transportation. How many people riding horses do you see on the interstate these days?
it also took roughly 40 years for cars to supplant horses. Could have happened much faster with intervention.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 22LR
If it was 1890 and life expectancy was 40, these liberals would be begging the government to leverage fossil fuels to double the life expectancy in less than 100 years.
And yet it is 2023
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeak
Oh, I see. An unprofitable business can only become profitable by getting the government to ban the competition and also cover any negative externality using taxpayer funds.
Who said that Dan? Certainly government support speeds things up, but no one said it was necessary. We have talked about externalities several times, and you still haven't bothered to learn what it is.

If you think government intervention is cheating, wait until you hear about how much the government was involved in everyone's favorite energy source, nuclear.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT