Says the Hamas supporter.But October 7th justifies anything.
If I were a Hamas supporter I would say so. I am not a Hamas supporter.Says the Hamas supporter.
Just an anti-semite?If I were a Hamas supporter I would say so. I am not a Hamas supporter.
If I were a Hamas supporter I would say so. I am not a Hamas supporter.
You are correct, my hatred is for a wing of Hamas that is intent on fomenting violence, not on the wing that built hospitals, schools, universities, museums, art galleries, day care centers erc. etc.
If I were an anti-Semite I would say so. I am not an anti-Semite. For the ten millionth time I'm telling you I'm an anti-Zionist.Just an anti-semite?
Fixed it for you.If I were an anti-Semite I would say so. I am not an anti-Semite. For the ten millionth time I'm telling you I'm an anti-Zionist who doesn't even know what Zionism is.
I am not for Hamas or what they did. I am just for the innocent Palestinians who have been ruthlessly killed by the most sophisticated weaponry available.Hamas made the decision to operate in high civilian areas for cover and October 7th was their decision. They've yet to surrender arms. All blood is on their hands.
So you are against killing innocent Muslims but killing innocent Americans is ok? Got it!I am not for Hamas or what they did. I am just for the innocent Palestinians who have been ruthlessly killed by the most sophisticated weaponry available.
Defenseless people human beings .According to the logic on this board the two people bombed OKC federal building should not have been the only one prosecuted all the militia groups in the US should have been killed.
Oh, those poor innocent Palestinians who never do nuffin. Hamas doesn't exist in a vacuum, alibaba.I am not for Hamas or what they did. I am just for the innocent Palestinians who have been ruthlessly killed by the most sophisticated weaponry available.
Defenseless people human beings .According to the logic on this board the two people bombed OKC federal building should not have been the only one prosecuted all the militia groups in the US should have been killed.
"Innocent"? Them folk cheer terrorism. The seed has been planted and is germinating within them. Grim reaper has been turned loose. "Innocent" my ass.I am not for Hamas or what they did. I am just for the innocent Palestinians who have been ruthlessly killed by the most sophisticated weaponry available.
Defenseless people human beings .According to the logic on this board the two people bombed OKC federal building should not have been the only one prosecuted all the militia groups in the US should have been killed.
Medic007 just read history of Zionists and how Israel was formed. You would understand the reason for this conflict. To me it is a political conflict not a religious one. Israel is not Jewish people who live there are mostly Jewish.Oh, those poor innocent Palestinians who never do nuffin. Hamas doesn't exist in a vacuum, alibaba.
Try to follow this very simple logic, alibaba. If Hamas hadn't invaded Israel and started a war, the Palestinians that Hamas uses as human meat shields wouldn't be dead.
This really is one of the easiest concepts in existence. "Don't want none, don't start none." But unfortunately, logic and common sense aren't in the toolkit of shitbag Islamic rapists. Maybe the rapist shitbags should surrender to prevent further loss of the Palestinians they murdered their political rivals for the opportunity to represent.
The reason there for the conflict is the Arab world initially refused to accept Israel has the right to exist. While some have come around the Muslim hardliners refuse to accept Israel does have the right to exist.Medic007 just read history of Zionists and how Israel was formed. You would understand the reason for this conflict. To me it is a political conflict not a religious one. Israel is not Jewish people who live there are mostly Jewish.
When I went to Israel in 2000 all the people I interacted with were all atheist with the exception of one. It was of course a minuscule number so no statistical argument could be made out of it but all of them seemed to want peace and a two state solution.
There are radicals on both side and either radicals on both side are put in their place or this conflict would keep killing humans on both sides
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Medic007 just read history of Zionists and how Israel was formed. You would understand the reason for this conflict. To me it is a political conflict not a religious one. Israel is not Jewish people who live there are mostly Jewish.
There’s no need to “dare” me to watch it. Ask politely and of course I’ll watch it. I watched it and found it to be normal boilerplate Zionist rhetoric, nothing new or astonishing to hear. I did find it interesting that he admits he’s made no effort to listen to or understand the “other side.” At least he did that.I watched a very good interview with John Fetterman (D Senator, Penn) by a NY Times writer. About half of it was about his support of Israel. I don't think I could state my position on the Middle East crisis any better. I know its not a Hamas propaganda source, and its clearly not a "right-wing" source. In fact, you can tell by the questions that the interviewer didn't agree with Fetterman. But @Ponca Dan , I dare you to watch it. At least to understand the opposite viewpoint from a position other than "Israel = Genocide".
You say you agree with everything he said, so let me ask you: he says he has always been for a two state solution but now realizes that cannot happen. So what do you and he think *is* the solution?Zionist rhetoric? Really. You are more brainwashed than I even imagined. But at least you watched it.
The solution is a two-state solution with Palestine becoming a country that AGREES to a two-state solution. Palestine leadership (aka Hamas) is completely against a 2-state solution, because it gives them what they "claim" they want and then all the money dries up. The last thing Hamas wants is peace with Israel.You say you agree with everything he said, so let me ask you: he says he has always been for a two state solution but now realizes that cannot happen. So what do you and he think *is* the solution?
This comment is pure boilerplate Zionist rhetoric. Surely you can see that. But for the sake of argument let’s say you and Fetterman are right, which makes a two state solution utterly impossible, as he said in the interview. So where does that leave things, what is a “possible” solution? Knowing a two state solution cannot happen what do you propose as a workable compromise?The solution is a two-state solution with Palestine becoming a country that AGREES to a two-state solution. Palestine leadership (aka Hamas) is completely against a 2-state solution, because it gives them what they "claim" they want and then all the money dries up. The last thing Hamas wants is peace with Israel.
If I may Dan,Knowing a two state solution cannot happen what do you propose as a workable compromise?
What was it that convinced the Germans and Japanese to decide to change their ways and live in peace?This comment is pure boilerplate Zionist rhetoric. Surely you can see that. But for the sake of argument let’s say you and Fetterman are right, which makes a two state solution utterly impossible, as he said in the interview. So where does that leave things, what is a “possible” solution? Knowing a two state solution cannot happen what do you propose as a workable compromise?
Dan's in deep thought now. In a fetal position.What was it that convinced the Germans and Japanese to decide to change their ways and live in peace?
Eliminate the leadership that prevents the 2-state solution from happening peacefully, which is what Israel is well on their way of doing now. Eventually though, the non-Hamas Palestinians, (you know the one's you care so deeply about), have to take their country back from Hamas. Until they do that, they will always be the WILLING human shields of the Hamas terrorists.This comment is pure boilerplate Zionist rhetoric. Surely you can see that. But for the sake of argument let’s say you and Fetterman are right, which makes a two state solution utterly impossible, as he said in the interview. So where does that leave things, what is a “possible” solution? Knowing a two state solution cannot happen what do you propose as a workable compromise?
I think Dan should start drinking.Dan is not one of the people that fights Evil. He fights the people that fight Evil.
Probably had something to do with dropping the atom bomb … twice. How do you think the Germans would have reacted if the winners of the war carved out a chunk of Germany for the creation of Israel, chased those already living there out of their homes and murdered those that refused to leave and huddled the survivors into a concentration camp run by the new Israelis. Israel in the middle of Germany. That would have gone over well!What was it that convinced the Germans and Japanese to decide to change their ways and live in peace?
In other words eliminate the Zionist leadership that is intent on consuming parts of Lebanon, parts of Syria, parts of Jordan, all of the West Bank and all of Gaza, making it Arab-free so they could consummate their desire for creating Greater Israel? The Netanyahu-led government of Israel that has killed every proposal for a two state solution so they could have it all? Yeah, that would be a good place to start eliminating the roadblocks.Eliminate the leadership that prevents the 2-state solution from happening peacefully, which is what Israel is well on their way of doing now. Eventually though, the non-Hamas Palestinians, (you know the one's you care so deeply about), have to take their country back from Hamas. Until they do that, they will always be the WILLING human shields of the Hamas terrorists.
Yer finally gittin yer wits aboutcha feller.In other words eliminate the Zionist leadership that is intent on consuming parts of Lebanon, parts of Syria, parts of Jordan, all of the West Bank and all of Gaza, making it Arab-free so they could consummate their desire for creating Greater Israel? The Netanyahu-led government of Israel that has killed every proposal for a two state solution so they could have it all? Yeah, that would be a good place to start eliminating the roadblocks.