ADVERTISEMENT

Journo List Topic O' the Week

Wow, speaking of lies.

Though I wonder if the Clinton campaign floated this as an exclusive story to these sources, knowing they would print it anyway and not be able to reveal that it was fed to them. Or are they all just past feeling any shame at all?
 
LOL - ignore the substance and focus on timing.


Can we lol at the same publications pointing out hillary's lies? I like to lol and you obviously like to lol so let's lol together at some fair journalism instead of this being a desperate and coordinated attack by the attack arm of the globalist campaign.


Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
Criticslly, the substance is the timing - not the spoon fed content from her campaign. Unless you consider her or her consign to be reliable sources on the topic of "lying." Experts? Yes. Reliable source? No.
The "source" here is Trump himself- his words. Did an HRC staffer compile them? Who really gives a shit - is he a pathological liar? That is a question worth exploring... if he isn't that should be easy enough to show.
 
The "source" here is Trump himself- his words. Did an HRC staffer compile them? Who really gives a shit - is he a pathological liar? That is a question worth exploring... if he isn't that should be easy enough to show.


That's rich. Hillary has a 25 year track record (at least) as a pathological liar, including to the parents of dead servicemen on the tarmac in DC. How much interest have the same "journOlists" shown in pursuing that story? They treat the families as liars or half crazy when they even deign to mention that story angle. Her whole ****ing campaign lied to them about her health and then most likely lied again about its cause when they could no longer support the "conspiracy theory" angle of her health due to irrefutable video evidence.

Talk about stereotypes. Do these reporters believe they have to protect Hillary because she's a woman?
 
You really want to line these two up and compare who is the biggest liar? Who would you rely on for a reasonable analysis?
 
You really want to line these two up and compare who is the biggest liar? Who would you rely on for a reasonable analysis?

You're doing it in this thread too.

Apples and Oranges David.

One candidate had been entrusted with the administration of policy, holding the public trust, decisions that affect people's lives (and deaths)....the other, not.
 
The "source" here is Trump himself- his words. Did an HRC staffer compile them? Who really gives a shit - is he a pathological liar? That is a question worth exploring... if he isn't that should be easy enough to show.

Yes, who really gives a shit about things like context, motivation and source? Great point.

200_s.gif
 
Politifact? Who would you rely on to scoreboard this (and the race to date)?
Certainly not Politifact.

As has been pointed out, and it is beyond dispute, Hillary lied ad nauseum to the press and to the people, to Congress about her e-mail server and the FBI investigation into it. She lied about the attack on Benghazi to both the press and the people and directly to family members of those killed serving this country at Benghazi.

Nothing Trump has or will say will rival the thousands of documented lies that Hillary Clinton has already told.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I hope Hillary can dodge all the sniper fire getting into the debate.

Comparing the level of lies is hilarious. She's a professional liar with express reasons for her deception. He's just a guy with a big ego that sometimes bends the story to make himself look good.

She's an NBA level liar and he's a junior high school level player.
 
Last edited:
Dangit davidallen, I had hope for you. You are jumping in to a foxhole with lying Hillary and she is going to shoot you when you are sleeping.

I'm not saying you need to vote for Trump but if you vote for Hillary you will have to live with that vote for the rest of your life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaPoke
I look at this differently. I know both candidates have lied, told half-truths, etc. That's basically a requirement to pander to the various audiences. But the timing of 4 left-leaning newspapers all publishing the same basic imbalanced article at the same day simply validates the perspective that the media is in the bag for Hillary. It actually hurts MSM more than it helps or hurts either candidate.

Justin
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT