Seems fair to me. Doesn't mean that homosexual behavior is wrong.
Johns Hopkins: No evidence people are born gay or transgender
- Thread starter AC_Exotic
- Start date
Contrary to what most libtard parents told their kids, it does not revolve around you.
It’s some comments in these kind of threads that remind me I still do have some good old liberal stances. Man, some eye opening stuff here. Virus as a kid causes homosexuality? Interesting.
Thats only because the sick perverted left has taught you to accept it.
Me, no way is it right or normal. I have known many people that were molested when young that turned gay, I have also known kids that had a gay Mom or Dad that also became gay. Explain that. Hell one lesbian woman I knew years ago had a gay son and a lesbian daughter. Explain the odds of that happening, no way they were not influenced one way vs the other in that household.
Pedophilia the same way, I have always believed that most Pedos were sexually abused or molested during childhood.
Last edited:
Having same-sex attraction is not wrong. Acting on it is wrong.
Unless the women are hot and you get to watch and pleasure yourself, right? Then it's okay... just a bit.
Explain that to me. I'm a Christian and just don't see it as 'wrong'.
The Bible says it's wrong.
Look, no one in this thread wants to make homosexuality illegal. I just want to have the freedom to disagree with that lifestyle. You and I both know the radical gay lobbyists are not going to stop with "agree to disagree." They're going to press the issue.
On the other hand, they are more than willing to raise, provide, and care for children who are in need of adoptive parents.
Problem solved?
Stepping way out on a branch here, I know, but I'm skeptical at @Ostatedchi is one who has been "taught to accept by the sick perverted left".
Bible says a lot of stuff is wrong, but none of it seems to elicit quite the hard-line response as this topic.
You’ve got to admit that dicks and buttholes make this a salacious topic compared to mixing fabrics and women preachers.
Depends on who you talk to.
I'm supposing the response is because is the huge public push from the left.
You see similar responses from the Christian community on abortion for the same reasons.
If being gay is not a choice, why is finding it repulsive a choice? I would totally get down with five playboy playmates, but it wouldn’t surprise me if Christians thought it was a sin.
Why we moved from tolerance to rainbow flags on government buildings and forcing the one Christian bakery in town to make a cake is asking for trouble. We seek these fights out because we personally dislike the other side. Its sad.
Why we moved from tolerance to rainbow flags on government buildings and forcing the one Christian bakery in town to make a cake is asking for trouble. We seek these fights out because we personally dislike the other side. Its sad.
Have you ever commented on something someone else does? Have you commented on someone’s sexual encounter in college? Or what someone eats? Or how they dress?
I didn’t say I cared, I was pointing out why this differs because it’s an abnormal thing to do when 90-99% of people don’t have those feelings.
Agreed. Leaning on “but the Bible sez” to repudiate the behaviors one finds personally gross while overlooking/rationalizing other behaviors seems quite disingenuous to me.
High-ranking religious officials from America’s biggest foreign aid recipient said much worse than that, recently.
Go away, you Nazi POS.
I personally think two dudes getting busy is gross as well. Not my cup of tea. But I just don’t think that automatically equates it to being amoral.
How about you stop bringing Jews/Israel into every single thread. We all know what you are. No need to find a way to derail every thread with your propaganda. No one here is buying what you are selling these days.
From a Christian perspective,I don't think so at all.
You'd see the same response if there were "Adultery Pride" parades popping up all over the country.
You can't equate homosexuality with adultery (or other things like pedophilia).
In the case of adultery, a third party (the spouse) is potentially hurt by the relationship between the 2 consenting adults. In the case of a homosexual relationship, they aren't hurting anyone (except for maybe your snowflake feelings). There is no "victim".
Unless the women are hot and you get to watch and pleasure yourself, right? Then it's okay... just a bit.
You know damn well it doesn’t count if both chicks are hot.
*edit to ask - what if you are a straight guy who has had (several) threesomes with women. Does that make you guilty of gay sin or just the regular fornicating kind?
Last edited:
Ok fine, but why the condemnation and legal forced compliance with people who do think it is amoral?
I can compare both and just did.
Some earlier noted that it seems odd why Christians (or people who believe the Bible) would repudiate the behaviors one finds personally gross while overlooking/rationalizing other behaviors.
The Bible is very clear in its repudiation of the act of homosexuality, adultery, or any other kind of extramarital sexual activity. Christians who say they believe, oppose those acts.
Now people commit those acts all the time, and churches have people who attend who have practiced homosexuality, adultery, or any other kind of extramarital sex.
We should be forgiving. The Lord forgives. At the same time, we should agree with his standards and as He forgives, agree with Jesus' pronouncement as He forgave the woman at the well in John 4, "Go and sin no more."
Last edited:
Can I think open marriages are wrong? Do I have to make a cake with two males and three females on it? What about rough sex, choking and punching between consenting adults? Can I think that’s wrong? Teach my kids it’s wrong? Can I tell others I think it’s wrong without losing my career and friends?
You can do whatever you want as long as it isn't harming another individual. If you want to disapprove of all of the above, that's your business. It is not my place to judge your thoughts/feelings. Actions might be a different story (depending on what actions you undertake).
Yes, I believe SCOTUS ruled that you don’t have to make an Eyes Wide Shut cake if you don’t agree on moral/religious grounds. And I agree.
I don’t know what you can & can’t do and risk losing your friends. If they disagree with you, are they not equally entitled to their free will in that decision?
What you want to discuss is completely tangential to the spirit of this thread and you know it. Like I said, go away.
Cake bakery case. Teaching homosexuality as an option to kindergarteners in public schools. Using public property for gay pride parades. Flying rainbow flags on government buildings that are co owned by people who find it immoral.
Just because you’re offended by it doesn’t mean your sensibilities carry more importance than anyone else’s.
If a gay pride group gets a permit for a parade, that’s their right. I find the Westboro loonies even more repulsive, but the law still protects their right to assemble.
Who co-owns a government building? If the owner of the building wants to do it, what’s the issue?
Do you really think Boston is going to allow the request to be honored for the Straight Pride parade?
