Don't put down our military.....they are the reason you can sit on your computer and talk all the BS that you seem to enjoy talking.....since you never answered my earlier question, I am sure you didn't make the sacrifice and serve in the military......you just enjoy the benefits given to you by the ones who did...This is of course silly. I almost don't wasn't to even answer. The F-22 will shoot at anything it sees BVR and it will get some kills. As it moves closer in theater it will face a hornets nest of AA systems and will have to retire. It is an air dominance platform and will have no say in anything that goes on in the battlefield.
BTW, an SU-57 will win in a dogfight. The F-22 shots from 40 miles away can be defended. I'd say a kill ratio with an F-22 against an SU-57 would be 60-40. But that depends on the pilot. The Russians are CHAD military. Every single year, the US become more of a ******, DEI, Trans military. Which is why Caucasians, the backbone of our military for 300 years are no longer signing up. NO WAY I allow my son to sign up to fight Chad's in a fag, diverse military.
Based on what? All NATO systems and tactics are failing.
Because Ukraine has a TON of old S-300 systems. The very same systems NATO says are too old are actually very deadly. That was augmented by 4 Patriot sytems. The Russians have taken out 3 of them. Which won't be replaced.
Now the Russians are killing everything in sight with glide bombs which can shoot from far away. In response the Ukies are moving up their AA, and the Russians are taking those out too. Complete Air supremacy has now defacto been achieved. Now the Russians are waiting for dry ground for a summer offensive. The good guys will win.
The Russians have 12 Su-57s and they are having to install a different engine, the engines they are using are not operating as planned....that's the polite way of saying they suck.....
Ukraine is not using NATO tactics, they don't have the capability to do so.......
With the sensor fusion system in the F-22, the SU-57 would never get close enough to dogfight an F-22 unless that was what we wanted, and that would only happen if we believe we have a good chance to win that dogfight.......What makes one pilot better than another is his ability to react to a situation quickly and correctly. A fighter pilot is a different breed, they have a natural ability, but that ability is improved by training. The difference in training between US and Russian pilots is a wide gap, it has been very obvious that Russian training is very choreographed, it leans heavily towards making their leaders look good more so than actual evaluation and critique .......you can't blame them, as we saw with their Hyper-sonic missiles, as soon as Ukraine started shooting them down, the engineer who designed them was arrested and has not been seen since.......same with many of their Generals who were fired, they tend to not be seen again.......even with pilot training, the AI systems on the F-22 ( and F-35) can evaluate a situation , make the best possible decision and implement that decision thousands of times faster than any human could
No one has said the S-300 is too old, its a good system........unlike Russia which has very little knowledge on the operating characteristics of our most modern systems, we have an enormous amounts of data on their systems which enables us to establish more effective jamming protocols and detection profiles
Russia is no where close to air supremacy ....they have air superiority, but that's a given with their massive numerical advantage..........We just gave Ukraine a few thousand glide bombs, they just started using them......again , not equipment we even use.......it was all surplus that was going to be destroyed.......
BTW......the Russian training is so good , they sunk one of their own ships yesterday during a live fire exercise in the Baltic.........
Last edited: