Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just saw Scarborough say something
1. We knew for a long time Flynn wasn’t masked. Explain in detail please how you think this debunks something.
2. Every day, dummy
3. There’s a thread on this page. Look it up.
1. I can't, Im not even sure what "masking" has to do with anything, he acted like it was a big deal. I'm asking. You constantly say I'm the one in a helmet, okay, I'm eating your red pill and looking objectively.
2. WHAT THEN, FOR CHRISSAKES?!?
3. Now we're getting somewhere. So someone's getting criminally charged?
lol1. We knew for a long time Flynn wasn’t masked. Explain in detail please how you think this debunks something..
Serious question on the unmask/masking:1. We knew for a long time Flynn wasn’t masked. Explain in detail please how you think this debunks something.
2. Every day, dummy
3. There’s a thread on this page. Look it up.
Where does the "Flynn not a target" come from? Other than early speculation by news readers, I don't recall that as a substantive position. Rather 3 years ago the WSJ reported exactly what we are hearing now, the same stuff certain posters breathlessly post daily as if it were new news.Serious question on the unmask/masking:
If Flynn was never masked, therefore not needing to be "unmasked", does that mean he was under surveillance and a warrant was secured to obtain this information?
If so, wouldn't that pretty much destroy the narrative we've heard that Flynn's information was obtained because they were watching Kislyak and General Flynn was just got in the net from FISA?
But if he's not a target why would his name be visible for all to see? I'm genuinely asking the question.Where does the "Flynn not a target" come from? Other than early speculation by news readers, I don't recall that as a substantive position. Rather 3 years ago the WSJ reported exactly what we are hearing now, the same stuff certain posters breathlessly post daily as if it were new news.
Keep spinning those lies!!!! Been wrong about a lot of stuff the last 3-4 years! Time to wisen up fat assWhere does the "Flynn not a target" come from? Other than early speculation by news readers, I don't recall that as a substantive position. Rather 3 years ago the WSJ reported exactly what we are hearing now, the same stuff certain posters breathlessly post daily as if it were new news.
and two weeks ago it was ignored because ree obamagateHave you seen the gap in the unmasking requests on Flynn? That's been open knowledge for nearly two weeks.
and two weeks ago it was ignored because ree obamagate
sorry I meant, REEEEEE!That's not how ree works, commie.
Things are being declassified left and right and do you honestly believe at this point there won’t be indictments?
Indictments FOR WHAT? Not masking Flynn? Masking means people's identity is covered up for.... agents (?) by... other agents (?) and he wasn't masked when transcripts were generated by agent clerks and passed to other agents? Is that what all this is? If so, why does Scarborough say this blows it all up if he wasn't masked? Prior to the last 48 hours I never heard of masking. Why would he be masked if he's a NSA advisor talking to a Russian and then lies about it? Hello?
Okay. Kliff's? Use your words. What does masking have to do with getting.... the fbi? For.... setting up Flynn? Right?Help me help you.
Okay. Kliff's? Use your words. What does masking have to do with getting.... the fbi? For.... setting up Flynn? Right?
Okay. Kliff's? Use your words. What does masking have to do with getting.... the fbi? For.... setting up Flynn? Right?
The useful beauty in this post will be lost on syskafail, but I wanted to acknowledge the useful beauty so that you didn't feel like your time was completely wasted.I probably post 20 highly credible and clearly informative pieces of information here er'ry day. Pearls before swine in some cases, evidently. Do yourself a favor, and read them. You don't have to admit to it, but you'll see what it's like to know stuff instead of just being angry that Trump is dragging his nuts across your face on every single thing.
DogPoop369 is not credible. Sorry mate.I probably post 20 highly credible and clearly informative pieces of information here er'ry day. Pearls before swine in some cases, evidently. Do yourself a favor, and read them. You don't have to admit to it, but you'll see what it's like to know stuff instead of just being angry that Trump is dragging his nuts across your face on every single thing.
DogPoop369 is not credible. Sorry mate.
#YouAintSmart is a perfect hashtag for you leftists.Going down hill fast.
Going down hill fast.
No. No, you don't post highly credible anything. I've sat down, read your posts before, and the numbers in there were contradicted by the very sources they cited to. They were thinly disguised propaganda/op ed pieces from mostly blogs and right wing media sources.I probably post 20 highly credible and clearly informative pieces of information here er'ry day. Pearls before swine in some cases, evidently. Do yourself a favor, and read them. You don't have to admit to it, but you'll see what it's like to know stuff instead of just being angry that Trump is dragging his nuts across your face on every single thing.
If it's such a scandal you'd think you could describe it in... oh, 25 words or less. Like the impeachment: