"Engaging in a conversation with mentally ill people is a fruitless venture." -- AC (September 9, 2018)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/493e2/493e2b2770887fad41a0263d91bad18b8994ab2f" alt="200.gif"
"Engaging in a conversation with mentally ill people is a fruitless venture." -- AC (September 9, 2018)
Are you an abortion absolutist?So the perjury allegation is alive and well? The "rape accusation" seems to be taking a hit.
As in absolutely against abortion?Are you an abortion absolutist?
Wait a sec... are you saying that if a case ends up 4-4 and is automatically kicked back to the lower court then that is that? Are you sure?
I'm going to wait on a second opinion from @my_2cents before I'm willing to believe this.If Supreme Court case goes 4-4....by rule and law, the lower appellate court decision stands.
Yes, I’m sure.
I'm going to wait on a second opinion from @my_2cents before I'm willing to believe this.
I'm going to wait on a second opinion from @my_2cents before I'm willing to believe this.
because the dems are in full coordination mode with this crazy bat $hit woman.Question: Why would the accuser think the FBI should investigate this matter? If a crime was committed as she has indicated, why wouldn't this be a matter for the local authorities? Since when did the FBI get into investigating high school groping accusations?
There's nothing for the FBI to investigate since it's not a federal crime (if it actually happened). It's just another smear and stall tactic to try to get people to *gasp* at the decision to move forward with the vote.Question: Why would the accuser think the FBI should investigate this matter? If a crime was committed as she has indicated, why wouldn't this be a matter for the local authorities? Since when did the FBI get into investigating high school groping accusations?
There's nothing for the FBI to investigate since it's not a federal crime (if it actually happened). It's just another smear and stall tactic to try to get people to *gasp* at the decision to move forward with the vote.
The narrative will be that Republicans and Trump don't care about women and victims of sexual assault. Joy Behar and Senator Mazie Hirono are already ranting and blaming all men.
So the FBI has no investigative function beyond federal crimes?There's nothing for the FBI to investigate since it's not a federal crime (if it actually happened). It's just another smear and stall tactic to try to get people to *gasp* at the decision to move forward with the vote.
The narrative will be that Republicans and Trump don't care about women and victims of sexual assault. Joy Behar and Senator Mazie Hirono are already ranting and blaming all men.
So the FBI has no investigative function beyond federal crimes?
They investigate nominees for courts, administration jobs, security clearance request for employees, and other positions within government. They have done 6 anal exams of Kavanaugh for such positions and nothing along these lines has been unearthed to my knowledge. If it had the likelihood is it would have been disqualifying and leaked.So the FBI has no investigative function beyond federal crimes?
So at the request of the president they could clear a SC nominees name?At the request of the president they stretch out.
Bark up that tree.
So at the request of the president they could clear a SC nominees name?
So we aren't worried?Yea if it needed to be cleared he could request it. His nomination isn’t in question and no one believes this crap but you and Joy Behar.
So at the request of the president they could clear a SC nominees name?
So you believe Hillary's name was cleared?At the request of the president they cleared Hillary's name, so I guess Trump could have them clear Kav with an equivalent 'investigation'.
So you believe Hillary's name was cleared?
So you think the FBI's chief investigator was clearly for Hillary? You are in favor of an FBI investigation into these accusations?I believe she was investigated by highly partisan agents who directed an investigation to achieve the expected innocent outcome. There is no argument that the chief investigator was clearly against Trump and for Hillary. So in this case, the FBI should find their most Right-wing investigator and assign him to this case. That way Cav gets the same investigative scrutiny that we all know Hillary got.
So you think the FBI's chief investigator was clearly for Hillary? You are in favor of an FBI investigation into these accusations?
They already conducted his background check and added what Feinstein turned over to the mix. The FBI has stated they're done unless the President requests something additional.So the FBI has no investigative function beyond federal crimes?
What in your mind are the FBIs jurisdictional limits?They already conducted his background check and added what Feinstein turned over to the mix. The FBI has stated they're done unless the President requests something additional.
The accuser, her attorneys, and the usual Democrats are the people asking for an FBI "investigation" to be done. What exactly do they want the FBI to investigate if it's not something criminal? And if it is a criminal investigation that they want, how exactly does the FBI have jurisdiction to conduct it?
What's in my mind or yours doesn't matter. Information about what the FBI does and their jurisdictional limts is public information.What in your mind are the FBIs jurisdictional limits?
And your interpretation of this public information is that the FBI cannot investigate this allegation, or will not investigate this allegation?What's in my mind or yours doesn't matter. Information about what the FBI does and their jurisdiction is public information.
So the bit about Hillary was just rhetorical?I'm not in favor of the investigation because there has been zero credible evidence provided to source such an investigation. You can't investigate a crime when you can't state "When or Where" it might have even occurred. If she went to the local police with this, they would have closed the case after collecting her statement. Why would you expect the FBI to perform differently?
Why would I need to interpret something that the Justice Department has already announced?And your interpretation of this public information is that the FBI cannot investigate this allegation, or will not investigate this allegation?
What did they announceWhy would I need to interpret something that the Justice Department has already announced?
Did this woman not have any friends in high school? You would think after such a near death experience she would have told someone.
They announced that the letter the FBI received on Sept 12 was forwarded to the White House Counsel, that the allegation doesn't involve any potential federal crime, and that the FBI's role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers.What did they announce
Trump needs to order the FBI to investigate and let them do discovery on the cell phone texts residing in this ladies phone and see what those texts say and what dots they connect. Research her phone records as well and see who she has been talking to. Pull bank records to see if she was paid off.
Do discovery on Feinstein’s email, phone records, etc....to determine the legitimacy of the manner in which this letter was obtained.
We had FBI agents so stupid to conspire via cell phone texts....this would be more fun then FISA document disclosure.
If they want an investigation then do it fairly and require broad discovery on both sides. We are talking stupid people here doing hateful things to obtain a selfish goal, they are exposed as hell because they are so focused on a false smear campaign.
I know who should and would be extremely nervous about texts and phone records going back to the time she started seeing this counselor and it would not be Kavanaugh or any Republicans. Problem is that takes time and is why this info was sat on for 2 months.
Be careful what you wish for Dr. Ford and Dem Senators.
Fun to ask someone to be investigated and make accusations until you realize a fair and true court proceeding should require adequate discovery from both sides to get to the facts and truth.
Oh, they also said that the FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation. They said that the purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States.What did they announce