So editing your posts on here now means one is disingenuous? Does that apply to you too?
lol
A warning for anyone who dares cross the liberals
- Thread starter HighStickHarry
- Start date
So editing your posts on here now means one is disingenuous? Does that apply to you too?
lol
You "frame" your communication to an excessive as fuq degree. You go back and edit when you think the framing is a little off. Again, shady AF.
That's your liberal M.O.
Brad, do you think there is a slippery slope with labeling an entire side (when there are only 2) as wrong/bad/whatever?
Would the fear of the 'wrong side' winning an election leave one open to, and accepting of, tyranny by the side one deems as correct, as it is preferable to the other side being in charge?
I think this is applicable to both sides of the spectrum, but I'd be interested in your thoughts if you can parse out what I'm attempting to say.
Your dedication to role is almost to be comended. It’s exhausting as well as annoying.
He's on his 7th FBI interview. He had nuclear code level clearance. Sooo.... what kinda lies are we talking about here? Whether he did an over the bra feel-up of the girl he referenced in high school yearbook? Or maybe he drank too much beer and passed out one time in college and his buddies drew dicks on his face and recorded it with a VCR camcorder?
yeah, no. That would be a fvcking stupid level of accountability to hold any adult to.
Any willful lie under oath. If this is proven, should he sit on the Supreme Court?
Asked and answered. A blowjob is the standard here. Anything less egregious than popping a nut on an intern, the answer is no he shouldn't be disqualified.
So essentially, small lies or lies that some may deem minor or irrelevant under oath by a judge desiring to sit on the Supreme Court doesn't matter now. I firmly disagree. Any judge who wants to be a Supreme Court Justice should never lie under oath. Period.
Do you believe "little" lies can sometimes point to bigger lies?
And there is the Clinton deflection. Just like clockwork lol. Clinton has never been nominated to sit on the Supreme Court, nor would she be. You want to talk about someone who would never be confirmed haha!
Think about it, you are now equating Kavanaugh to Clinton. Seriously consider that for a moment.
Also, do you believe "little" lies can sometimes point to bigger lies?
This may be an inadequate answer for now, but my my brain is tired, so I may circle back and add more...
I don't think there are only 2 sides... I believe the Left is completely fractured and the sooner the moderate, "traditional" left understands it, the sooner healing will begin in this country.
There's a fundamental difference in the 2 planks on the left currently, and I see it as primarily a cultural battle.
Nice try spoogenozzle.
What actually just happened is I showed you what a basic bitch hypocrite you are and you immediately resorted to 12 year old girl emoticons.
Nope, not at all. You deflected to the Clintons, typical of those on the right when they have nothing else or can't answer straight questions. Even Kavanaugh deflected towards them in his testimony lol. He needed to appeal to you after all.
So I'll ask one more time, do you believe "little" lies can sometimes point to bigger lies? Yes or no?
Promise this is the last time you'll ask? Your entire theoretical lie thing is dumb. Your assumptive generalizations are dumb. Your use of "Clinton deflection" as it's own deflection from your hypocrisy is... dumb.
I'm pretty sure If I wanted to kill myself, I could climb your ego and jump to your IQ.
Now the ad hominems.
It is tough when you actually have someone challenging all the junk you get spoon fed from the right-wing media, isn't it? Just attack me again though, your fellow right-wingers will laugh and like, and you can feel like a big man behind a computer.
Have a good evening.
That was very well executed. Gotta give that one a hearty clap.
If Ford is proven to have lied and/or coordinated the release of her story with Dem groups/Hilll staffers abound she serve time in a federal prison?
This post would bother me....if I gave even the least little crap about what you think about me.
I wouldn’t do it myself....not my style....but you are seriously overplaying your outrage hand here.
To the point of me starting to agree that Brad actually has a point in his comments about you.
If Kavanaugh if proven to have lied under oath and committed perjury, should he be a justice on the Supreme Court?
I’m not sure. It didn’t disqualify Bill Clinton from being President, so I guess not. Precedent and all.
I disagree. I think it was a despicable comment.
You wanna defend it, go right ahead.
lol, again, the Clinton deflection. It is like you guys talk off the same script.
I didn't ask about the President. I asked about a justice on the Supreme Court. Should a man who is proven to have committed perjury during his confirmation hearing be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court?
Would you throw Dr. Ford in prison for perjury but reward Kavanaugh with a seat on the Supreme Court for perjury?
You have tons and tons of people here willing to go round and round with you.
I’m not interested, thanks.
Dude, attempting to gain the moral high ground on a message board is the futilest of the futile.
Oh good, I was real worried it was because you are disingenuous and a part of your liberal MO!
Oh good, I was real worried it was because you are disingenuous and a part of your liberal MO!
Actually I did it randomly just to lead you down this particular path.
I pretty much guessed you wouldn’t be able to resist.
Precedent has been set.lol, again, the Clinton deflection. It is like you guys talk off the same script.
I didn't ask about the President. I asked about a justice on the Supreme Court. Should a man who is proven to have committed perjury during his confirmation hearing be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court?
Would you throw Dr. Ford in prison for perjury but reward Kavanaugh with a seat on the Supreme Court for perjury?
Similar threads
