Popes been a politician for years now. Has he got the flock out of debt yet? Has joe cut "him" some slack yet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Popes been a politician for years now. Has he got the flock out of debt yet? Has joe cut "him" some slack yet?
When he was a little girl, yes.You showered with joe didn't ya?
And she's mad she's a big girl now?When he was a little girl, yes.
lolPopes been a politician for years now. Has he got the flock out of debt yet? Has joe cut "him" some slack yet?
No we used to live in a Democracy, now we live in a oligarchy.Nope. It speaks to the stupidity of the Republican Party.
We live in a democracy. When you figure that out, let me know.
No, we still live in a democracy.No we used to live in a Democracy, now we live in a oligarchy.
Yer racing on an 8 track. I like yer style but crash is inevitable. And you have no idea what I'm talking about. Good luck. Now go eat yer oatmeal before it hits cold.lol
Boy, you quickly moved away from "Pope ain't fixed that shit yet?" when I informed you for @soonerinlOUisiana viewpoint on the Pope.
King Joe!No we used to live in a Democracy, now we live in a oligarchy.
That what it's supposed to be but when the MSM, the nation's intelligence services, the justice system, corrupt politicians and the wealthy all align to manipulate the easily manipulated, we live in a oligarchy.No, we still live on a democracy.
On that note. Do you want Trump to be the Republican nominee in 2024? Yes or no?
Do you want Trump to be the Republican nominee in 2024? Yes or no?That what it's supposed to be but when the MSM, the nation's intelligence services, corrupt politicians and the wealthy all align to manipulate the easily manipulated, we live in a oligarchy.
Sure I'm good with Trump or whoever the Republican nominee is. ABAD, Anybody but a Democrat.Do you want Trump to be the Republican nominee in 2024? Yes or no?
lol, this is absolutely hilarious. You won't answer this simple question . . .Sure I'm good with Trump or whoever the Republican nominee is. ABAD, Anybody but a Democrat.
Would you be happy with kamala? Booty gig? 😁lol, this is absolutely hilarious. You won't answer this simple question . . .
Do you want Trump to be the Republican nominee in 2024? Yes or no?
Yes.Would you be happy with kamala? 😁
I'm gonna send you a dozen of my grandma's cookies.If you ever met Biden, you'd be begging to see his sack lol.
That man has been in politics for some 50 years now. Dang, this is a guy who President Nixon called after he was elected to the Senate and Biden had lost half his family in a car crash during the holidays.
Think about it. If that is even possible for you.
Ain't moved an inch, well I moved about 10 feet towards the toilet for a shit a moment ago. Can I say "moment" without insult?lol
Boy, you quickly moved away from "Pope ain't fixed that shit yet?" when I informed you of @soonerinlOUisiana viewpoint on the Pope.
I disagree with this move. The whole world needs to see what kind of vile perverts make up the LGBTQYAP movement.Nice to see Twitter move to shut that sicko down.
Twitter suspended user who revealed pedophile flag has account suspended
A Twitter user who posted about the creation of a pedophilia flag on the social media platform had their account suspended a day later.www.foxbusiness.com
Just because you attempt to equate that asshole to the LGBTQ+ community doesn't make it so. That guy is much more of a gatecrasher that's unwelcome and still trying to sneak into party than some welcomed brethren.I disagree with this move. The whole world needs to see what kind of vile perverts make up the LGBTQYAP movement.
THank you. I was going to post their crown jewel of pedophilia. They elected his ass to the Speakership and never sat a word or explain how they ELEVATED A PEDOPHILE to the 3rd highest office in the land.And all political parties.
We have certainly had our disagreements. That said, wth is with you sticking up for an under-represented minority against unfair demonization? Have you had a stroke? Has your Gen Z kid taken over your account? You or someone close to you victimized by this stuff or what?Just because you attempt to equate that asshole to the LGBTQ+ community doesn't make it so. That guy is much more of a gatecrasher that's unwelcome and still trying to sneak into party than some welcomed brethren.
I actually find it a very conservative Republican value to defend others against bigotry. I find it repugnant to judge someone based upon those intrinsic traits that makes a person uniquely themselves. I find it even more repugnant to attempt to paint an entire group based on the actions of an individual. You'll see me defending/condemning any attempt to do so regardless of the characteristic being used - race, ethnicity, age, political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, whatever. Both sides of the political spectrum do it; they just choose different traits on which to focus.We have certainly had our disagreements. That said, wth is with you sticking up for an under-represented minority against unfair demonization? Have you had a stroke? Has your Gen Z kid taken over your account? You or someone close to you victimized by this stuff or what?
How many were actually elected AFTER their perversions were made public?THank you. I was going to post their crown jewel of pedophilia. They elected his ass to the Speakership and never sat a word or explain how they ELEVATED A PEDOPHILE to the 3rd highest office in the land.
They're all of a sudden worried about kids after victimizing kids as a de facto policy for decades. Of course. Q started all this, and the guy that started that was.... yes, you guessed it: a pedophile.
They're so broken. My suggestion is don't let your kids within a mile of these MF'rs that are now parroting the grooming stuff, they're projecting AGAIN.
Biden.How many were actually elected AFTER their perversions were made public?
You’re confusing intrinsic disorders with the resulting overt behavior.I actually find it a very conservative Republican value to defend others against bigotry. I find it repugnant to judge someone based upon those intrinsic traits that makes a person uniquely themselves. I find it even more repugnant to attempt to paint an entire group based on the actions of an individual. You'll see me defending/condemning any attempt to do so regardless of the characteristic being used - race, ethnicity, age, political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, whatever. Both sides of the political spectrum do it; they just choose different traits on which to focus.
There's a much longer answer than that but I don't want to write a book.
Good point.Biden.
No I'm not. Otherwise language meant to demean and dehumanize the LGBTQ+ community wouldn't be thrown around so casually.You’re confusing intrinsic disorders with the resulting overt behavior.
Except that being gay is a disorder, and a perversion to boot, just like the other LGBTQYAP disorders. Contrary to your propaganda, “disorder” is a matter of opinion, regardless of what some leftist hack in a white coat says.No I'm not. Otherwise language meant to demean and dehumanize the LGBTQ+ community wouldn't be thrown around so casually.
And being gay isn't a disorder.
Thanks for proving my point.Except that being gay is a disorder, and a perversion to boot, just like the other LGBTQYAP disorders. Contrary to your propaganda, “disorder” is a matter of opinion, regardless of what some leftist hack in a white coat says.
It’s really quite simple. What you do in the privacy of your own home is your own business. So don’t make it everyone else’s business by making it public.
What point is that? That normal people hate (loathe is probably more accurate) perverts? 🙋🏼♂️Guilty as charged.Thanks for proving my point.
This would go a long way to solving the division. How many straight people make sure to tell you they are straight within minutes of meeting them?Except that being gay is a disorder, and a perversion to boot, just like the other LGBTQYAP disorders. Contrary to your propaganda, “disorder” is a matter of opinion, regardless of what some leftist hack in a white coat says.
It’s really quite simple. What you do in the privacy of your own home is your own business. So don’t make it everyone else’s business by making it public.
Indeed. You can’t “hate” what you don’t know about. What they really want is compulsory validation. Well, fvck that shit.This would go a long way to solving the division. How many straight people make sure to tell you they are straight within minutes of meeting them?
This would go a long way to solving the division. How many straight people make sure to tell you they are straight within minutes of meeting them?
Great. I also loathe flashers, S&M freaks, piss freaks, scat freaks, dog fvckers, and seat sniffers. How’s Phillips 66 doing with those demographics?On that we agree.
Like I said. Thanks for proving my point. Enjoy reveling in your bigotry.Great. I also loathe flashers, S&M freaks, piss freaks, scat freaks, dog fvckers, and seat sniffers. How’s Phillips 66 doing with those demographics?
How would one make it publicly known they are conservative, Christian or straight?How often do you, by words or deeds, make it publicly known that you are a conservative or a Christian? Is that shoving your conservativism/Christianity on others? Are you expected to hide or deny that aspect of your core self in order to placate those that believe differently than you?
Don't hold someone to a standard you aren't living up to.
come on. You're better than that.How would one make it publicly known they are conservative, Christian or straight?
You're the only conservative republican I've ever heard espouse that.I actually find it a very conservative Republican value to defend others against bigotry. I find it repugnant to judge someone based upon those intrinsic traits that makes a person uniquely themselves. I find it even more repugnant to attempt to paint an entire group based on the actions of an individual. You'll see me defending/condemning any attempt to do so regardless of the characteristic being used - race, ethnicity, age, political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, whatever. Both sides of the political spectrum do it; they just choose different traits on which to focus.
There's a much longer answer than that but I don't want to write a book.
We are the party of Lincoln after all. And there's plenty of us out there that think this way.You're the only conservative republican I've ever heard espouse that.
Ever hear of NAMBLA? Their founder was a left winger. You probably had a lot in common (except the pedophilia part, of course). https://www.nambla.org/Thorstad.htmlTHank you. I was going to post their crown jewel of pedophilia. They elected his ass to the Speakership and never sat a word or explain how they ELEVATED A PEDOPHILE to the 3rd highest office in the land.
They're all of a sudden worried about kids after victimizing kids as a de facto policy for decades. Of course. Q started all this, and the guy that started that was.... yes, you guessed it: a pedophile.
They're so broken. My suggestion is don't let your kids within a mile of these MF'rs that are now parroting the grooming stuff, they're projecting AGAIN.