No, I oppose massacres as an option of choice. In this case the question becomes who massacred whom. About 1000 Hamas fighters entered Israel and began killing people and fighting the IDF until they either were killed themselves or fell back to their own territory taking hostages with them (hostages they intended to trade for some of the several thousand Palestinian hostages/prisoners Israel is keepng under wraps), during the course of which 1100-1200 people were brutally killed, some of the innocents were killed by their own defense forces, how many we'll never know. It lasted a few hours before it was over. But by all appearences what the Hamas fighters did to innocent Israeli civilians is beyond belief. In reponse the ultra-far right nationalist Israeli government led by Bibi Netanyahu has unleashed a terror campaign of its own that now is reponsible for the cold blooded murder of over 11,000 people, over 4,500 of them children, has flattened city blocks that contained homes, schools, hospitals, businesses, cut off virtually all supplies necesary for survival, has been carried out for over a month, and then asks us with teary eyes to understand what a victim Israel is. Who massacred whom? If I can say without qualification that what Hamas did on October the 7th was a terror massacre that demands retribution, can you at least say what Israel has done is retribution enough?