Because good sources pass along true facts and bad sources pass along untrue facts. As I've maintained for years, you only believe the bad sources -- experts in nazi occult, snake oil salesmen, alex breitbart... and that article was more spin that fact, at least two paragraphs or so in. I'm not sure you understand the distinction between fact and inference.
Yeeeeahhhh.... You are super well known for good sourcing and not #shittingthebed. As I told you - I googled "Schiff says whistleblower not needed" to make a point from this morning and posted the first thing that seemed to quote the little bitch. You read way more into it than that. Let me try this... me talking to you. I'm the source here. Hey sys, Adam Schitt said he may not even need the whistle-leaker. "
Probably because he doesn't want that person to testify and have to answer questions about working with him previously."
But you have a point in citing my point that true underlying facts makes the narrator's character irrelevant. Glad we're in agreement for a change. So if the whistleblower's story is separately substantiated by the internal call memo, other witnesses, Biff, and multiple statements against interest, why would schiff or anybody else give a shit if the whistleblower testifies?
Because - and I'm just guessing here. he doesn't want the whistle-leaker to answer questions in public. Because, it's all fabricated bullshit, and would not hold up well under scrutiny and might highlight some uncomfortable associations for the whistle leaker.
Look sys, I'm trying to help you here. Work with me would you?
1. Schiff did not expect Trump to release the transcript. Everything you saw after that was Benny Hill show comedy, and now the whistle blower is useless because WE HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT.
2. Schiff moved on away from a quid-pro-quo on the call to making the claim that basically the quid pro quo was that the Ukraine guy would GET a phone call from Trump. And to get that call, he evidently was supposed to find dirt on Biden.
3. Trump's favor was info on CrowdStrike - Not sloppy Joe.
4. It's a garbage story that only idiots believe at this point..... and finally....
5. The vote on impeachment has been cancelled - for one of two reasons. Either Nancy did not have the votes and couldn't get it done, or DID have the votes and did want this to be turned into a trial of the democrats (not Trump) in the Senate. There was no win to this for her, and Schitt did her no favors with his sloppy banana republic soft coup sequel.
Don't get too down buddy. I can see you are having a rough day. Take heart! There will no doubt be another lie you can sink your teeth into any day now. I wish you would eventually wise up and stop emotionally investing in them, but I have to be honest - it's too much fun to fück with you when you do, so... really... I guess what I'm saying is...
Don't stop...
Believing.