I absolutely did commit to a side . . .
"Honestly, I don't know and I don't believe any of us know for a fact."
That doesn't sound like committing to a side, but ok.
Why would being bi-sexual imply what you claim? Couldn't someone who is bi just be naturally attracted to both sexes?
Possibly, but again, its more common in certain environments which would imply that there is environmental influences at play. Otherwise, that mentality would be much more evenky dispersed across all populations, and it clearly isn't. I note that your reply failed to touch this portion of my argument, which is the key tenet of why I believe that environmental factors play a significant role in one's sexuality.
Not if someone claims cross-dressing can be a means of teaching children to live queerly and introduce queer pedagogy.
Is it also your belief that people can both be made transgender and born transgender?
Transgenderism is a completely different topic to me. Its my biggest issue with the LGBT community. I am a full-throated supporter of the LGB community. Love who you want. Marry who you want. Your sex life is none of my business. Whether by nurture or nature, LGB is a behavior, and I'm a full believer that being free means that I have no right to interfere in your behavioral choices as long as they don't impede or intercede my own freedoms. But transgenderism is biological. Whether driven by gender dysphoria (born that way) or simply societal/social media acceptance (made that way), society is being asked to disregard biological science in order to promote an alternate reality. And again, from a behavioral standpoint, I don't care if a guy wants to wear a dress, or even chop his penis off to fit his desired mold. Again, that doesn't interfere with my personal freedoms. But when I'm asked to ignore the biological advantages of testosterone, so that a transgender can compete against biological females, or when I'm told that we should accept sterilization surgeries (which gender reassigment surgeries are) for children without parental consent because a teacher or counselor pushed their own ideology upon them, then I draw the line and refuse to support such lunacy.
And finally, you raise the point of queer pedogogy. Can you tell me what queer is? I know what LGBT is and who fits into those classifications. But I've asked more than once on this board, and I've yet to have a liberal tell me what queer actual represents that doesn't already fall into one of the LGBS (Straight) paradigms, or the Transgender paradigm. Since you chose to use the terminology in your response. Please provide
your definition of queer pedagogy.