Have you talked to sleepy about his higher taxes and his creation of our out of control inflation lately Dan? Don't try to blame it on anyone other than the dimms Dan.
Wow. Just Wow.
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
Then allow me to reword a bit. Exchange the words Trump for Trump supporters.
You are calling supporters of Trump good little nazis. Ok, so what, its a horrible comparison for the same reasons. Throw in Biden supporters and you have cult that will vote for him because of the d by his name.
You unfortunately are still left in the middle voting for no one and praying either side won't kill you when it doesn't realy matter governments will try to kill you end of story. So why again make the comparison when it gets you no where and only emboldens the ones you are attempting to warn off. He apparently did not learn thing from all the interviews he did. He is creating himself what he fears the most and back in rabbit hole he goes checking his watch.
Sleepy's entitled, as well as the Kennedys and Clinton's. I could go on and on and on.
You know me only from this chat room, which is designed for discussing and commenting only. You have no clue about anything else about me or what actions in which I participate. But I do love to read and when I see something interesting or something that stirs the pot a little I like to bring it here. Anyone is free to ignore me at any time! One thing I will say: if you consider voting to be acting, and if you think voting is how the world gets “fixed” you might want to study some of the results brought about by voting. Start with how Biden was voted into being the premier actor. And when you say things like you said in your last sentence you just look a little foolish. You didn’t read the link but you’ve convinced yourself it says you’re Hitler. (Where did the reference to Stalin come from? Why don’t you throw in Mao and Castro while you’re at it?)
Meatloaf didn't turnout well today Dan? I'd be angry also. My favorite meal. 😁
You’re trying too hard to justify your being offended. Drop the “nazi” and substitute “fanatic” or even just “follower” and you’ll be closer. The article, by the way, is directed at Trump fanatics. The Biden-fanatic whataboutism is immaterial to the subject at hand. It’s an unserious attempt to deflect so you don’t have to face your own demons.
I disagree with you on many fronts, the biggest disagreement being you think my life will be in danger unless I join one of the two warring sides.
I repeat I KNOW I can’t warn off the fanatics. They’re fanatics! Nothing will warn them off. He and I are attempting to warn off the curious ones who wonder if they ought to become fanatics, too.
He learned a great deal from his interviews. He even said at the beginning he hadn’t understood why the normal people wound up hating Hitler while the fanatics couldn’t let go of their devotion. And then he proceeded to write an entire article on what he learned about the difference between the fanatics and the normal people.
There’s not much better than a good meatloaf! Luckily I ate leftovers from last night’s dinner from Signature Grill, including the last couple of bites of the Chocolate Gnash which were to die for. So, no, the last thing I am is angry!
I see you assumed I read or cared and was referring to your vaunted link.
Last edited:
No, I recognized you hadn’t read it because your comment had next to nothing to do with what it said. I did assume you cared enough to defend your man from your belief that you knew what you were talking about, which in a way is a prime example of the fanaticism he’s talking about.
My superficial thoughts are a direct reflection of my intellect.
Would you say my observation skills are spot on when talking about Democrats, Biden, the left in general, but suspect when it comes to Trump and his fanatics?
No you miss the mark there as well. You haven't figured out Democrats pose a greater threat to our Constitutional Republic than Trump or sadly to say many of our adversaries around the world.
Lets say Trump is elected as President, will Democrats lay down and allow him to do what ever he wants? Will they start to do anything they can to hold him accountable and remove him from office? How about Republicans will they go merrily along with what ever Trump wants? Now compare that to Democrats and their brain dead supporters? We've already seen they will support what they are told. You might want to set aside your Trump hatred and start looking at the big picture.
I don’t miss that mark at all, Bearcat, where did you get that preposterous idea? I’ve said a thousand times the Democrats pose a far greater short term danger to our liberty, and I’ve said another thousand times I preferred Trump to either Biden or Hillary, but that didn’t mean I like Trump or want him to be president. You’ve conveniently forgotten because you’re angry I don’t like Trump, and I’ve started a couple of “anti-Trump” threads lately.
I'm not angry about anyone not liking Trump, I don't care much for him either but I'm not going to do the Democrats bidding for them.
You can say Trump can not win the general all you want, I don't believe that. If Trump doesn't stand a chance why are Democrats nd the deep staters in the Republican Party wiping their ass with the Constitution to try and keep him from running. The narrative Democrats are going after Trump to get voters to support Trump is about as big a pile of BS as I've ever heard but obviously some people are stupid enough to buy it.
"I'm not angry about anyone not liking Trump..."
Boom! Same here. But if some want to constantly repeat that mantra, then so be it. It's kind of entertaining.
Of course you’re angry! Why wouldn’t you be angry? You see Donald Trump as a force for good in the world standing between what’s best for the country and the destruction the Democrats are causing, maybe the only guy who can stop it. So why wouldn’t you be angry at someone you see blocking his progress? You’d be crazy not to let that make you angry.
It’s not important that I don’t think Trump can win, I’m a nobody, I have no influence on anybody. But the fact is the Democrats are convinced Trump can’t beat them and they are doing everything in their power to get Republican primary voters to be so angry at what they’re putting Trump through they’ll vote for him even if he admitted he schemed an insurrection. That’s not a pile of bs, that’s exactly what they’re up to. Which makes for the irony that by voting for him you’re doing the Democrats’ bidding for them, the exact opposite of what you want. It’s a hell of a dilemma!
Pish and tosh! Your collective reactions are reactions of people that are angry. I don’t understand why you are so reluctant to admit it.
They're not trying to keep him from running. They are trying to ensure that he gets the nomination. The Democrats think Biden stands a better chance to beat Trump due to his high negatives vs. a traditional candidate. Their strategy is working. All of the legal maneuverings are helping him not hurting him. Whether or not Biden can beat him remains to be seen.
Nope.
You really only parrot the mainstream about one person.
Most of the time you’re off the res with mainline narratives.
I have never been so insulted in all my life! I pride myself that I never parrot anything mainstream.
Roe v Wade has been overturned because of trump. That is not a lesser evil. That is the polar opposite of evil.
What are the odds that a younger Trump impregnated one of his countless bimbos and paid for her to get an abortion?
How do you read him like that. @2012Bearcat i read differently. I read him as staunch conservative that grew up in a family that valued hardwork. Trump has tried to portray (act) himself as a Reagan Republican and most conservatives understands someone portraying. Liken yourself to someone that generation revered.
Trump does not portray himself as anywhere near a Reagan conservative. You have been bamboozled if you think he’s a conservative at all. Classic conservatives are small government free market advocates. Trump is neither of those.
As for Bearcat I read his responses as “how dare you!” Not steam coming out of his ears from fury, but absolutely offended that someone says something negative about a man in whom he has great trust. I told Bearcat I like him and respect him and his opinions, and I do. But I disagree with him about who Trump is and what he stands for and whether he could fulfill Bearcat’s expectations to stop the Democrats cold - or even if he actually wants to or would even try. I do not trust Donald Trump. I think he’s a charlatan, a grifter, a con man who has a world class ability to trick people into believing his promises, promises which disappear in thin air as soon as he no longer needs you to focus on them. And I think there are far more people who see him that way than the slobbering drooling devotion of the fanatics who think he is a magic man.
The Heritage Foundation begs to differ, giving Trump kudos for enacting more of the conservative agenda by far in his first year than Reagan did in eight.
"Trump adopted two-thirds, or about 64 percent, of the Heritage agenda, meaning that the administration copied and pasted 334 of the think tank’s unique policy proposals. By comparison, the New York Times reports, Reagan adopted just 49 percent of the Heritage agenda making 2017 a banner year for Heritage."
"“‘Hell, why can’t we do that? Let’s try it. Let’s make it happen,’” said Heritage founder and former president Ed Feulner impersonating the president. “In some respects, Trump the nonpolitician has an incredible advantage, even over Ronald Reagan,” Feulner told the New York Times. “Because Ronald Reagan knew there were certain things government couldn’t do.”
"From its Capitol Hill campus, Heritage has cast a long shadow over Washington policy fights. The fact that Trump has taken up their agenda speaks to their continued influence. The fact that Heritage brass mentions Trump in the same breath as Reagan reflects the state of modern pragmatic conservatism."
Heritage: Donald Trump has achieved more than Ronald Reagan in first year - Washington Examiner
President Trump entered the Oval Office as a populist question mark. But after a year, the conservative Heritage Foundation now trumpets that Trump has a more conservative track record than Ronald Reagan at least according to their standards. Trump adopted two-thirds, or about 64 percent, of the...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
At this point in our history, no person should be compared to Hitler unless that person is advocating for the annihilation of a whole group of people. The 6 million Jews would have gladly taken Trump or his supporters in any election, so stop trying to justify this guy’s article.
You don't know who the writer is?
Sorry, you can't invoke the Hitler card and then in the next breath say, "well, I'm not calling them Hitler fanatics". That pig don't fly.
Your position on unilateral free global trade would put you squarely in the globalist camp.
Can't purchase Cuban Cigars yet our market is flooded with shit made Communist Products from......
Not a single person in the link was compared to Hitler.
A link using Hitler to make points about Trump. But keep trying to cover your butt.
When there are explicit psychological characteristics/similarities between the fawning admiration of the Hitler fanatics and Trump fanatics the pig not only flies, it soars. At no point in the article does he say Trump fanatics and Hitler fanatics are the same people. He says they both latched onto a charismatic individual and refused to see flaws.
Free market advocates are squarely in the individualist camp. Globalists you are describing are in the camp that thinks governments need to reach agreements to allow people from their countries to trade with each other, without government approval the trade is not permitted. That’s state capitalism, a soft fascism, not free trade.
If you had bothered to read the link before commenting you’d know it used the emotional attraction the Hitler fanatics had toward their leader to point at similarities to the emotional attraction Trump fanatics have toward theirs. At that point, the point after you read the link so you knew what you were talking about, something you said might have relevance or credibikity. As it is you’ve built a straw man in your mind so you can knock it down, while at the same time avoiding having to examine your own reasons for being a fanatic.
