Wow. Just Wow.

[Ponca Dan]

The most forthrightly reasonable comparison of Trump to Hitler and the MAGA fanatics to Hitler’s fanatics that could be written. And, no, MAGA fanatics, it’s not the comparison you will immediately conclude it is without reading it. In its own way it’s much worse.

David Cole – Dissent Watch

dissentwatch.com

 

[Rdcldad]

 

[Ponca Dan]

View embedded media

The comparison has nothing to do with racism. As I suspected the typical MAGA is going to jump to a conclusion without knowing what he’s talking about.

 

[SoonerRedYukon101]

Yeah, let's totally weaponize the federal government against our political opponents and when they fight back let's call them fascists. Check.

 

[Ponca Dan]

Yeah, let's totally weaponize the federal government against our political opponents and when they fight back let's call them fascists. Check.

You read it. He’s talking about you. Do you see yourself in what he describes?

 

[GunsOfFrankEaton]

 

[Rdcldad]

The comparison has nothing to do with racism.

As I suspected

thanks dan

you exude 5D chess level brilliance

 

[Ponca Dan]

I swear you guys are as predictable as saying there's snow on the South Pole. I get it, you and your leader have been badgered for years by the Democrats, the left, the MSM, the law enforcement agencies, yadda, yadda, yadda. So it's only natural that you respond to any criticism of your leader and your loyalty to him by assuming you don't need to see what the criticism is, you already know what it is and you know that it comes from the same people you have been browbeat into hating with everything you've got. So you assume this article is about racism, fascism, anti-semitism, the desire to conquer the world through war, and it's none of that. You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point, and you might need to consider an alternative attitude, because the attitude you currently carry with you will almost certainly lead us to destruction. I know! I know! The left started it, the left is worse by order of magnitude, the left needs to be stopped no matter the cost! It's the "no matter the cost" you need to examine.

 

[22LR]

I swear you guys are as predictable as saying there's snow on the South Pole. I get it, you and your leader have been badgered for years by the Democrats, the left, the MSM, the law enforcement agencies, yadda, yadda, yadda. So it's only natural that you respond to any criticism of your leader and your loyalty to him by assuming you don't need to see what the criticism is, you alresdy know what it is and you know that it comes from the same people you have been browbeat into hating with everything you've got. So you assume this article is about racism, fascism, anti-semitism, the desire to conquer the world through war, and it's none of that. You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point, and you might need to consider an alternative attitude, because the attitude you currently carry with you will almost certainly lead us to destruction. I know! I know! The left started it, the left is worse by order of magnitude, the left needs to be stopped no matter the cost! It's the "no matter the cost" you need to examine.

You should change your name to PoncaDick.

 

[squeak]

I swear you guys are as predictable as saying there's snow on the South Pole. I get it, you and your leader have been badgered for years by the Democrats, the left, the MSM, the law enforcement agencies, yadda, yadda, yadda. So it's only natural that you respond to any criticism of your leader and your loyalty to him by assuming you don't need to see what the criticism is, you alresdy know what it is and you know that it comes from the same people you have been browbeat into hating with everything you've got. So you assume this article is about racism, fascism, anti-semitism, the desire to conquer the world through war, and it's none of that. You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point, and you might need to consider an alternative attitude, because the attitude you currently carry with you will almost certainly lead us to destruction. I know! I know! The left started it, the left is worse by order of magnitude, the left needs to be stopped no matter the cost! It's the "no matter the cost" you need to examine.

I think you mean ice.

 

[Alpha Woke]

“You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point”

O really?

 

[soonerinlOUisiana]

You should change your name to PoncaDick.

PoncaDipshit. FIFY. All I saw on PoncaDipshit’s link was a bunch of random blog fragments making no discernible point.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I think you mean ice.

Good point. Let's change snow to ice.

 

[Ponca Dan]

“You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point”

O really?

You have nothing to lose and a great deal to consider. I know it will be triggering for you to read it the same way the cancel culture/wokesters are easily triggered by an opinion that's difficult for them to ponder. But just as it would be in the cancel culture/wokesters interest to pay attention when they're being told what a mistake they are making, so it applies to the Trumpster's version of their own cancel culture/victimization/wokester attitude. The difference is I thought the Trumpsters were made of sterner stuff. Your reaction to this thread leads me to believe I have been wrong.

 

[Ponca Dan]

You should change your name to PoncaDick.

You should read the link.

 

[Ponca Dan]

PoncaDipshit. FIFY. All I saw on PoncaDipshit’s link was a bunch of random blog fragments making no discernible point.

Click on the top "blog fragment" and you'll be where you need to be.

 

[Syskatine]

PoncaDipshit. FIFY. All I saw on PoncaDipshit’s link was a bunch of random blog fragments making no discernible point.

“You really ought to read what he writes and consider that he just might have a point”

O really?

I think you mean ice.

Bless your hearts, the cult had a pretty rough week politically. There's no reason to keep kicking while you're down. Have a nice Friday morning suprise.

Maybe it's time to just set down the anger and dumbassery? Just be more like a democrat and enjoy the world for a little bit instead of all the anger and spite?

 

[2012Bearcat]

The most forthrightly reasonable comparison of Trump to Hitler and the MAGA fanatics to Hitler’s fanatics that could be written. And, no, MAGA fanatics, it’s not the comparison you will immediately conclude it is without reading it. In its own way it’s much worse.

David Cole – Dissent Watch

dissentwatch.com

Now I know why you do not understand people that would vote for Trump again, if he is the nominee. You listen to people who themselves do not understand.

 

[Alpha Woke]

You have nothing to lose and a great deal to consider. I know it will be triggering for you to read it the same way the cancel culture/wokesters are easily triggered by an opinion that's difficult for them to ponder. But just as it would be in the cancel culture/wokesters interest to pay attention when they're being told what a mistake they are making, so it applies to the Trumpster's version of their own cancel culture/victimization/wokester attitude. The difference is I thought the Trumpsters were made of sterner stuff. Your reaction to this thread leads me to believe I have been wrong.

I’m convinced you just use people’s posts to say some shit you left out of your previous post.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I’m convinced you just use people’s posts to say some shit you left out of your previous post.

That’s interesting. I’m convinced most Trumpsters are terrified of reading anything, no matter how mild, that puts a spotlight on your mistaken notions of who you convince yourselves you are. You get triggered beyond all reason if someone says something “mean” about you. You guys are the most easily “offended” group of people there is. You’re always accusing your leftist “enemies” of having their heads stuck in their behinds while simultaneously burying your heads deep in the sand.

 

[Syskatine]

I’m convinced you just use people’s posts to say some shit you left out of your previous post.

 

[Syskatine]

LMFAO! The Cult will believe anything!

 

[Ponca Dan]

LMFAO! The Cult will believe anything!

View embedded media

View embedded media

View embedded media

Here's somehing you will learn when you get old: you will have a mental image of yourself as you looked when you were in your early 30's and were on top of your game and were as fit and virile as you were ever going to be. Then you look in the mirror and are reminded you don't look like that anymore. I imagine when he was young and trim DJT was 6'3" and 215 lbs, and was nailng empty-headed liberal girls from all across New York, and that's how he still sees himself. That's completely understandable. Still, it's funny that he thinks we don't see the old Donald Trump and wants to pretend he's still "that guy" he remembers himself to be.

 

[Forpetessake]

You should change your name to PoncaDick.

He is all over the place for sure.

 

[Ponca Dan]

He is all over the place for sure.

I seem to be all over the place to those who have picked a side and dedicated all their emotion and energy to defending/protecting their side from any opposition, right or wrong. I hate both sides and so criticize them with equal vigor. When you understand that you realize I'm consistent. In the meantime the Democrats/leftists on this board are convinced I'm a far right wing nutcase, while the Trumpsters are positive I'm a traitor who says bad things about the man to whom they have extended full devotion.

 

[Forpetessake]

I seem to be all over the place to those who have picked a side and dedicated all their emotion and energy to defending/protecting their side from any opposition, right or wrong. I hate both sides and so criticize them with equal vigor. When you understand that you realize I'm consistent. In the meantime the Democrats/leftists on this board are convinced I'm a far right wing nutcase, while the Trumpsters are positive I'm a traitor who says bad things about the man to whom they have extended full devotion.

I am in the middle. I'm a moderate which is why I said I would vote Tim Scott. It's would be for naught though. No one is close to trump. No one is close to bised either. Biden wins , then Kamala wins and will be president. I can't see Biden running a second term. I have my doubts he will finish this term due to health.

 

[soonerinlOUisiana]

Bless your hearts, the cult had a pretty rough week politically. There's no reason to keep kicking while you're down. Have a nice Friday morning suprise.

Maybe it's time to just set down the anger and dumbassery? Just be more like a democrat and enjoy the world for a little bit instead of all the anger and spite?

View embedded media

Actually, had $300,000 check come in yesterday from a Jones Act case. Not a bad week at all.

 

[soonerinlOUisiana]

Click on the top "blog fragment" and you'll be where you need to be.

I read it. Dumb post, PoncaDipshit. The comparison fails miserably. Besides the obvious differences, Trump didn’t start a war that he never should have started, which seems to be the gist of the post. In fact, Trump was merely the weapon in a war that WE started, against an enemy that deserves to be destroyed — a war which is far from over.

 

[Alpha Woke]

That’s interesting. I’m convinced most Trumpsters are terrified of reading anything, no matter how mild, that puts a spotlight on your mistaken notions of who you convince yourselves you are. You get triggered beyond all reason if someone says something “mean” about you. You guys are the most easily “offended” group of people there is. You’re always accusing your leftist “enemies” of having their heads stuck in their behinds while simultaneously burying your heads deep in the sand.

There you go again.

Please show me where you’ve considered anything I’ve said .in our last few conversations.

Just one.

Thats what makes your whole “You should read” crap funny Dan.

You don’t read anything.

 

[Alpha Woke]

I don’t care at all.

I’m just here to observe the psychosis.

My favorite is a cult member calling others cult members.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I am in the middle. I'm a moderate which is why I said I would vote Tim Scott. It's would be for naught though. No one is close to trump. No one is close to bised either. Biden wins , then Kamala wins and will be president. I can't see Biden running a second term. I have my doubts he will finish this term due to health.

I did not watch the debate so the only thing I can go by is reports that most people think the "winner" was DeSantis. I think as candidates drop out DeSantis will start to see an uptick in his poll numbers. When/If it becomes a two man race between Tump and DeSantis I wouldn't be surprised to see that DeSantis has a real shot. I am not a DeSantis fan particularly, but I do favor him over Trump, and I think if he got the nomination he would win the general in a blowout.

If the race is between Biden (or Newsom) and Trump the whole campaign will be about Trump, Trump, Trump. That's the way Trump would want it, his psychotic narcissism knows no limits. But in the long run it would ruin his chances.

If the race is between Biden (or Newsom) and DeSantis the campaign will be about Biden's record (or Newsom's) vs DeSantis'. Game over.

Unfortunately Ramaswamy is such an outsider all he could campaign on is his rhetoric, which he is very good at. But I think the Democrats would use his lack of experience against him. Besides, he is all but saying out loud he's running to be Trump's VP, which would put him in position to grasp the ring in 2028.

Ulimately it doesn't matter which candidate wins the whole thing, the country will lose.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I read it. Dumb post, PoncaDipshit. The comparison fails miserably. Besides the obvious differences, Trump didn’t start a war that he never should have started, which seems to be the gist of the post. In fact, Trump was merely the weapon in a war that WE started, against an enemy that deserves to be destroyed — a war which is far from over.

If that was your takeaway from the link you missed the point by a mile. The gist of the post is the Trump fanatics exhibit the same psychological profile as the die-hard Hitler supporters. He says two or three times it's not about the actions of the two leaders, Trump is an amateur in that department. The point is when a group of people become so emotionally invested in a politician, the way Hitler's die-hard fanatics did, and the way Trump's die-hard fanatics are being, nothing good can come from it. Win or lose the Trump die-hards will screw up the political landscape for years. You need to check your premises when you are willing to do anything it takes to win. You run the risk of becoming what you blame your enemies of being. In fact it's almost a certainty that will happen. You may get satisfaction that you "won" only to discover your win didn't have the results you thought it would.

 

[Ponca Dan]

There you go again.

Please show me where you’ve considered anything I’ve said .in our last few conversations.

Just one.

Thats what makes your whole “You should read” crap funny Dan.

You don’t read anything.

Perhaps it would be helpful if you explained what you mean with this post.

You've commented twice before on this thread. In Comment 11 you said "Oh, really." And in Comment 19 you said "I'm convnced you use other people's posts to say some [stuff] you left out of your previous posts." I actually considered both of your comments. I responded to Comment 11 at Comment 14, and Comment 19 at Comment 20, both of which were about as shallow as yours.

So that's two replies in one thread. I read everything you wrote and responded in kind. If you have something of substance please show it. It appears to me you're the one who refuses to read. You've argued against links I've supplied without reading any of them, which lends you no credibility. I supplied the links in hopes thay would spark a conversation. You reject such a conversation, and insist I ignore points you make that have little to no bearing on the topic at hand, even though I think I've responded to all your comments (or most of them at least). It apprears you've decided you already know what they say and so you can dismiss them at will. Which is fine. But please stop lambasting me for not behaving in the manner you are hoping to direct.

 

[Syskatine]

I don’t care at all.

I’m just here to observe the psychosis.

My favorite is a cult member calling others cult members.

 

[SquatchinPoke]

Dan you get his dick size also. Hands check out? How about them teeth we need to kick that loser to the field?

 

[OUSOONER67]

 

[Alpha Woke]

Perhaps it would be helpful if you explained what you mean with this post.

You've commented twice before on this thread. In Comment 11 you said "Oh, really." And in Comment 19 you said "I'm convnced you use other people's posts to say some [stuff] you left out of your previous posts." I actually considered both of your comments. I responded to Comment 11 at Comment 14, and Comment 19 at Comment 20, both of which were about as shallow as yours.

So that's two replies in one thread. I read everything you wrote and responded in kind. If you have something of substance please show it. It appears to me you're the one who refuses to read. You've argued against links I've supplied without reading any of them, which lends you no credibility. I supplied the links in hopes thay would spark a conversation. You reject such a conversation, and insist I ignore points you make that have little to no bearing on the topic at hand, even though I think I've responded to all your comments (or most of them at least). It apprears you've decided you already know what they say and so you can dismiss them at will. Which is fine. But please stop lambasting me for not behaving in the manner you are hoping to direct.

I was pointing out the irony of you wanting people to read your crap when you ignore anything someone else writes to keep saying the same crap.

Over and over and over.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I was pointing out the irony of you wanting people to read your crap when you ignore anything someone else writes to keep saying the same crap.

Over and over and over.

Forgive me, I am unaware that I've ignored what you've written.

 

[soonerinlOUisiana]

If that was your takeaway from the link you missed the point by a mile. The gist of the post is the Trump fanatics exhibit the same psychological profile as the die-hard Hitler supporters. He says two or three times it's not about the actions of the two leaders, Trump is an amateur in that department. The point is when a group of people become so emotioanlly invested in a politician, the way Hitler's die-hard fanatics did, and the way Trump's die-hard fanatics are being, nothing good can come from it. Win or lose the Trump die-hards will screw up the political landscape for years. You need to check your premises when you are willing to do anything it takes to win. You run the risk of becoming what you blame your enemies of being. In fact it's almost a certainty that will happen. You may get satisfaction that you "won" only to discover your win didn't have the results you thought it would.

All I did was read what the blogger actually wrote. Your bullshit commentary is nothing but a bunch of meaningless intellectual wrapping tissue. Y’all still don’t get it. It’s not about promoting Trump, it’s about attacking the swamp and the deep state, which includes both democrats and weak-willed republicans. Exterminating the latter from the landscape is just as good as exterminating the former, though exterminating both would be ideal.

 

[Ponca Dan]

All I did was read what the blogger actually wrote. Your bullshit commentary is nothing but a bunch of meaningless intellectual wrapping tissue. Y’all still don’t get it. It’s not about promoting Trump, it’s about attacking the swamp and the deep state, which includes both democrats and weak-willed republicans. Exterminating the latter from the landscape is just as good as exterminating the former, though exterminating both would be ideal.

I repeat: if you read what he wrote and that was your take away you completely missed his point. It's funny that you insist I don't get it. You come to Trump's aid *every single time* usually with furor and often times (like now) either not understanding what you're arguing aganst or intentionally missing the point in an endeavor to deflect. You're so obvious that everything you write is *totally* about promoting/defending Trump, because you have convinced yourself (or he has convinced you) that his opponents need to be exterminated and he's the only one who can do it. Extermination is an intersting choice of words, I wonder if you "get" that.