”blood on your hands”
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/18/politics/donald-trump-florida-shooting-twitter/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/18/politics/donald-trump-florida-shooting-twitter/index.html
Twitter flips the script—victims to Trump
- Thread starter CowboyUp
- Start date
Remember in 2013 when Democrats filibustered a bill that would have provided $30 million a year for 10 years to increase funding for school security among other things?
Good times.
Good times.
That’s literally pennies on the dollar per capita. Tulsa alone needs 30 million dollars of improved school security.
This isn’t a few million dollar a year symbolic effort...this is a real problem that will require far more money staying here and not going over to Afghanistan/Syria/Africa/Iraq But that’s another sensitive fiscal issue for Republicans...they like that blank check.
Did you take a look at all of the other stuff in there?
An increase of $30 million per year was better than no million per year. $120 million would have been made available so far to date. This country has got to get serious about school security. Save the rhetoric and political posturing over things that won't matter now for a later day.
Oh, and by the way, well stated. The trillions we've wasted in meaningless combat could have been better spent domestically.
Trump nailed it
Wake the fuk up
Maybe if they had chased what could actually be corroborated
Instead of chasing a white rabbit
This could have been prevented
But no, Hillary lost
Asshurt took over
An “insurance policy” was top priority.
Sick
Wake the fuk up
Maybe if they had chased what could actually be corroborated
Instead of chasing a white rabbit
This could have been prevented
But no, Hillary lost
Asshurt took over
An “insurance policy” was top priority.
Sick
Oh and let’s address this
"17 of my classmates are gone. That's 17 futures, 17 children, and 17 friends stolen. But you're right, it always has to be about you. How silly of me to forget. #neveragain"
Complete bullshit
Fake news gonna fake news
All of the dead are not kids aka classmates
This is a tragedy
No doubt
Amazing to watch Dems and the media scream about lives of children
While they support the ripping apart of babies and receive funding from those that sell their body parts
"17 of my classmates are gone. That's 17 futures, 17 children, and 17 friends stolen. But you're right, it always has to be about you. How silly of me to forget. #neveragain"
Complete bullshit
Fake news gonna fake news
All of the dead are not kids aka classmates
This is a tragedy
No doubt
Amazing to watch Dems and the media scream about lives of children
While they support the ripping apart of babies and receive funding from those that sell their body parts
Bump stock not included
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...ures-ar-15-raffle_us_5a8a02f2e4b00bc49f455f30
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...ures-ar-15-raffle_us_5a8a02f2e4b00bc49f455f30
If it were a felony to possess these does it violate 2nd Amendment?
How is this used for hunting?
https://www.range365.com/magazine-capacity-restrictions-by-state
How is this used for hunting?
https://www.range365.com/magazine-capacity-restrictions-by-state
1. 2nd Amendment doesn’t give us the right to hunt.If it were a felony to buy or sell these does it violate 2nd Amendment?
How is this used for hunting?
2. Magazines aren’t covered by the 2nd Amendment.
3. Why didn’t Dems ban these while in control with Obama?
1. Ok...
2. So is NRA ok with outlawing oversize clips? Could potentially save many lives..
3. Good question
Last edited:
Surprise, surprise, here's Biff's parrot carrying water again. Tingles, doesn't it? To be a part of a movement so big.
Since 2000, California hasn't allowed buying or selling of "oversized clips."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/san-bernardino-shooting-authorities-respond-to-active-gunman/
Good for California. Many lives may have already been saved. Not a lawyer but just doesn’t seem like 2nd Amendment guarantees anyone the right to own over size clips that make it easier to slaughter humans.
The gun issue should help you understand that resolution isn't part of the process, or the super duper smart pols on the left would've taken care of this when they had COMPLETE control of the outcome, but they didn't. If you aren't asking yourself why, you need to.
it takes less than a second to change magazines. “clip” size is mostly cosmetic. a hundred round magazine is far likely to jam and is less efficient than a 20 or 30 round mag.
not advocating their banning but once again, soft handed progressives have no idea how guns work.
not advocating their banning but once again, soft handed progressives have no idea how guns work.
Hyperbole.
Well, the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify what size of "clips" you can have, or what type of gun, or what caliber of gun... It's only specific in the right to keep and bare arms. Not a difficult concept.
Societal expectations that drive law creation and court interpretations are what determine the details, hence California's ban on "oversized clips." Note that California recently tried to make it a crime to own an "oversized clip." So far that hasn't held up in court because of another constitutional right.
Cuz governments can never be bad and a 2 million man army can easily defeat a 200,000,000 man army. Logic! We armed citizens stand no chance against our mighty military so we might as well throw our hand down and fold.
Surprise, surprise, here's Biff's parrot carrying water again. Tingles, doesn't it? To be a part of a movement so big.
What’s wrong?
CNN hasn’t given you the required talking points?
The Constitution guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. It addresses nothing about ammunition. It does require “a well-regulated militia.” How does regulating ammunition restrict the right to keep and bear arms?
aree you asking with an intellectually honest purpose? do you really want to have a conversation about this? or are you simply proselytizing?
Hardly a mystery. They were pushing O-care and the stimulus and thought both would ultimately help them, and they were concerned about the politics of midterms. They still lost. Just goes to show 1. Make legislative hay when you can, and 2. They lack any semblance of courage. Not as soulless and shit hearted as the GOP, but nothing to put on a resume, either.
Don't forget the stated purpose: the security of a free state. I think the state's security is pretty established without every nutbag in the country having an AR-15.
No...it doesn’t. Can experienced shooters change mags fast? Yes, but you use hyperbole to your wits end.
No, the 2nd Amendment does not require a well regulated militia. That isn't the operative clause. It would help you to read the words of our Founders regarding what the 2nd Amendment was for. A big hint, it was written in response to the Constitutional provision to have a standing army.
No, you still don't get it. They're every f'n bit as soulless and shit hearted. You said it yourself, "They put politics first."
So, they had every opportunity to make sweeping changes but, put their paychecks above children's lives.
Libs have no moral high ground here. You're told you do. You're just gullible enough to believe the bullshit.
