So says Mitt Romney.
And Tulsi responds:
And Tulsi responds:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gabbard is definately eating up and regurgitating Putin's propaganda. Which shouldn't suprise anyone given her history. One can easily see why @Ponca Dan likes her so much, for he does the same thing on here.
With that said, I wouldn't go as far as Romney did to call her actions treasonous. Idiotic?, yes? Misguided?, yes. But not treasonous.
Not to mention that Romney is simply giving Gabbard what she wants, attention. Ignore her. No one cares what she has to say except @Ponca Dan and Q followers like @Corndog2021.
33.33% or 1/3.What percentage of your daily intake of ”news” is propaganda?
What right-wing propagandists do you keep up with? What left-wing propagandists?33.33% or 1/3.
Most days, I read right-wing propaganda sources to keep up with what those sources are feeding their flock. I also will tune in to Fox News every now and then and see what their propagandits are pushing. I also take note of what leftist propagandists are pushing out too.
33.33% or 1/3.
Most days, I read right-wing propaganda sources to keep up with what those sources are feeding their flock. I also will tune in to Fox News every now and then and see what their propagandits are pushing. I also take note of what leftist propagandists are pushing out too.
What is your method to determine what is truth and what is propaganda?33.33% or 1/3.
Most days, I read right-wing propaganda sources to keep up with what those sources are feeding their flock. I also will tune in to Fox News every now and then and see what their propagandits are pushing. I also take note of what leftist propagandists are pushing out too.
Agree 100 percent. And on that note you could also replace many pseudo conservatives (Establishment)on this board with Bret Baer/sean Hannity propaganda equally.Interesting....My2Cents is a great source for lib propaganda. They could replace Maddow with him and no one would notice the difference.
Tulsi's military experience is pushing some of her stance on this. She knows what Russia is capable of, and she knows that Russia has not gone all in yet. Romney is an elitist fool by trying to beat the war drums as hard as he is. He is trying to change his traitorous image on the right, but I don't think anyone is buying it except Lincoln project supporters (hate that they took Lincoln's name to do what they did). They are neither Republican or Conservative and only pro elitists.So says Mitt Romney.
And Tulsi responds:
Writers on Breitbart, TheBlaze, American Thinker, etc. Also, commentators on Fox News. Every now and then I'll visit Infowars and OANN when I'm in the mood for a crack ride lol.What right-wing propagandists do you keep up with?
Writers on Daily Kos, Mother Jones, some writers on Daily Beast, etc. Also, commentators on MSNBC (not very often on this though, although I usualy can keep up with what they.What left-wing propagandists?
Do you seriously not know how to determine what is "news" and what is "propaganda?"What is your method to determine what is truth and what is propaganda?
Nope, I'm 67% news. Not all news is propaganda.So, you‘re like 67% weather and traffic?
Nope, I'm 67% news. Not all news is propaganda.
I do keep up with the weather too though lol.
What Russian propaganda is Tulsi pushing? We have government officials that have admitted in Congressional hearings we have biolabs in Ukraine. It makes sense to do everything we can to prevent the release of whatever pathogens are in these labs. Where is the propaganda in that?Gabbard is definately eating up and regurgitating Putin's propaganda. Which shouldn't suprise anyone given her history. One can easily see why @Ponca Dan likes her so much, for he does the same thing on here.
With that said, I wouldn't go as far as Romney did to call her actions treasonous. Idiotic?, yes? Misguided?, yes. But not treasonous.
Not to mention that Romney is simply giving Gabbard what she wants, attention. Ignore her. No one cares what she has to say except @Ponca Dan and Q followers like @Corndog2021.
Really? Have you been paying attention? Gabbard is so deep in Putin propaganda that even Sean Hannity had to push back on her a few weeks ago on his show. 🤣🤣What Russian propaganda is Tulsi pushing?
The fact that you repeatedly say that any opinion different from your own comes from right wing propaganda makes my request relevant. I didn’t say I am unable to separate truth from propaganda, I asked what is your method of doing so. It was sincerely asked. I assume you can actually answer how you make your determination.Writers on Breitbart, TheBlaze, American Thinker, etc. Also, commentators on Fox News. Every now and then I'll visit Infowars and OANN when I'm in the mood for a crack ride lol.
Writers on Daily Kos, Mother Jones, some writers on Daily Beast, etc. Also, commentators on MSNBC (not very often on this though, although I usualy can keep up with what they.
are saying without actually watching them.)
Do you seriously not know how to determine what is "news" and what is "propaganda?"
If not, that definately explains a lot about you.
If you are able to separate news from propaganda, why are you asking me then? Sincerely asked lol, yeah right.🤣🤣I didn’t say I am unable to separate truth from propaganda, I asked what is your method of doing so. It was sincerely asked.
Really? Have you been paying attention? Gabbard is so deep in Putin propaganda that even Sean Hannity had to push back on her a few weeks ago on his show. 🤣🤣
A simple Google search would expose you to the Putin propaganda that Gabbard has been pushing. Have at it.
Again though, who the heck cares? Gabbard is irrelevant and this is another attempt by her to get the attention she so desperately wants. Romney shouldn't have given the nut what she wanted.
Okay, I get it. Your method of distinguishing what is truth and what is propaganda is determined solely on whether it agrees with what you want to believe. Based on past comments you have made one can assume you think any left-wing commentary with which you disagree is really warmed over right wing propaganda. But in a nutshell: if it is contrary to what you want to believe then it is propaganda.If you are able to separate news from propaganda, why are you asking me then? Sincerely asked lol, yeah right.🤣🤣
I'm not playing your childish games anymore Dan. If you know how to separate news from propaganda, then you should clearly know how I do it as well.
Why are you limiting this to just that tweet? Did Romeny limit his comment to just that tweet or is that what the right-wing article @Ponca Dan linked to tried to do?Please try to stick to the topic. I am discussing this tweet and nothing else.
Why? Because that was what I was specifically asking about?Why are you limiting this to just that tweet? Did Romeny limit his comment to just that tweet or is that what the right-wing article @Ponca Dan linked to tried to do?
Gabbard has said a lot in defense of Putin and Russia lately. She hasn't just made one tweet!🤣🤣
So this is what you do? I stated "if you know how to separate news from propaganda, then you should clearly know how I do it as well." So is this how you separate news from propaganda? Interesting.Your method of distinguishing what is truth and what is propaganda is determined solely on whether it agrees with what you want to believe.
As usual on this board, you are wrong.Based on past comments you have made one can assume you think any left-wing commentary with which you disagree is really warmed over right wing propaganda. But in a nutshell: if it is contrary to what you want to believe then it is propaganda.
So do you want to talk just about just that tweet, as the right-wing article tried to do, or all the other comments Gabbard has made about Putin and Russia?Why? Because that was what I was specifically asking about?
So do you want to talk just about just that tweet, as the right-wing article tried to do, or all the other comments Gabbard has made about Putin and Russia?
I see nothing in Romney's tweet referencing one tweet by Gabbard. Do you?
If you truly want to be fair-minded, then why are you trying to just focus on that one tweet by Gabbard?Since that was the tweet I was referring to yes I would like for you to show us how that tweet is propaganda. If you can't then just admit the tweet wasn't propaganda and if it makes you feel better provide your examples of Tulsi spreading propaganda.
I'm not a Tulsi fan by any means but I do try to be fair minded.
OKSTATE1 is acutely perceptive.Interesting....My2Cents is a great source for lib propaganda. They could replace Maddow with him and no one would notice the difference.
If you truly want to be fair-minded, then why are you trying to just focus on that one tweet by Gabbard?
Did Romney cite that one tweet by Gabbard in his own tweet? No he didn't. The right-wing article did that.
Romney is right that Gabbard is pushing Russian propaganda. All one has to do is listen to what she has been saying lately to understand that. He is wrong though to call it treasonous.
From the sound of it they want to arrest you first and investigate you later. All with the just the accusation of you being a Russian spy with no actual proof outside of a tweet. Where is the collusion with Russian agents? When did she talk with Putin to be an agent of Putin?Who would have thought so many in the left would be so willing to pick up the mantle left behind by Joe McCarthy?
Romney stands to lose a lot of $ if the way of doing business in the Ukraine changes in the future.From the sound of it they want to arrest you first and investigate you later. All with the just the accusation of you being a Russian spy with no actual proof outside of a tweet. Where is the collusion with Russian agents? When did she talk with Putin to be an agent of Putin?
Romney is just making an accusation that he doesn't have to back up because he can as a member of Congress and get away with it. The view on the other hand are bordering on Liable, they do need to be able to back it up. Not sure Tulsi counts as a public figure as in the views eyes, she a nobody and they say it camera.
Okay, I get it. Your method of distinguishing what is truth and what is propaganda is determined solely on whether it agrees with what you want to believe. Based on past comments you have made one can assume you think any left-wing commentary with which you disagree is really warmed over right wing propaganda. But in a nutshell: if it is contrary to what you want to believe then it is propaganda.
I simply asked what was propaganda about that one tweet.
Who referenced that tweet though? It wasn't Romney.that one tweet referenced was not propaganda.
So now you are able to read Romney's mind? Damn you are talentedWho referenced that tweet though? It wasn't Romney.
See how easily you are duped and misled by a right-wing article? Happens all the time with you.
Ana Navarro is a Republican. So it isn't just "many" on the left advocating this.Who would have thought so many in the left would be so willing to pick up the mantle left behind by Joe McCarthy?
Are you able to? Was the author of that right-wing article able to? Because that is what the author tried to do. Tried to claim Romney was talking about just one tweet when he never even referenced that tweet!So now you are able to read Romney's mind? Damn you are talented
I agree.Ana Navarro is a Republican. So it isn't just "many" on the left advocating this.
Regardless of who advocates it, such a position is wrong and dangerous. Gabbard should not be investigated by the DOJ for exercising her freedom of speech, regardless of how crazy her comments are. If one doesn't want to hear what she has to say, flip the channel away from Fox News. Simple as that.
I could have liked this post if you hadn't included CNN.😁I agree.
I don't watch Fox News. They're no different from CNN or MSNBC.
It will be interesting to see if Clinton eventually is proven right about Gabbard running as a third party candidate. @Ponca Dan advocates for this all the time nowadays.We know Cank the Cvnt did.
Hillary Clinton suggests Russians are 'grooming' Tulsi Gabbard for third-party run
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard/index.html