May I take the opportunity to kiss Biff's ass and give him credit for this year's great okra production?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Despite losing depreciation write off? Haven't looked at this scenario, genuine question...
Hope he is successful in making effective reductions in entitlements. Would be a great follow-up win after this tax plan victory. Of course, the MSM will use your terms of a “crusade to destroy”, so low-information voters will look at it as a negative.I wonder what will be fresher on people's minds in November, these bonuses or Paul Ryan's upcoming crusade to destroy Medicare and social security.
Vote Republican! We want to reduce your Medicare!Hope he is successful in making effective reductions in entitlements. Would be a great follow-up win after this tax plan victory. Of course, the MSM will use your terms of a “crusade to destroy”, so low-information voters will look at it as a negative.
Lots of things we need to do as a country that are tough to explain to the public. And doubly tough with low-information voters who faithfully listen to the liberal media.Vote Republican! We want to reduce your Medicare!
Surefire plan for 2018
Hope he is successful in making effective reductions in entitlements. Would be a great follow-up win after this tax plan victory. Of course, the MSM will use your terms of a “crusade to destroy”, so low-information voters will look at it as a negative.
Lots of things we need to do as a country that are tough to explain to the public. And doubly tough with low-information voters who faithfully listen to the liberal media.
People want free stuff and when that is curtailed and more effectively managed there is no doubt people will complain. Shoot, I just finished listening to a leftist greedy dolt on a CNN panel who admitted she knew her family would see about $1k to $1200 in less taxes, but was mad because other people, who earned more than her and pay a lot more in taxes, would get a larger tax break.
If that is how you interpreted my statement then I explained the CNN panelist poorly or you are reading into it.Wait...so someone admits their family is rich enough already, and doesn’t need this tax cut...and that’s a bad thing?
If that is how you interpreted my statement then I explained the CNN panelist poorly or you are reading into it.
The person wasn’t saying they didn’t need the tax cut, they were whining that their tax cut wasn’t as large as the neighbors. Greed and envy are ugly.
Which is exactly why this plan makes no sense. Why are we giving the rich 26,000 more for every million? That’s almost half the total annual median household income in all of America. If anything, it shows how honest Republicans are about their greed, doesn’t it?
Why are we giving??? Are you being serious?
You do realize it is THEIR money!! They earned it. The government is not giving it to them. The government is simply not taking as much from them. And a majority of American tax payers will see a reduction in taxes.
This is the opposite of government greed.
I think you grossly overestimate the impact on the middle class, who will see a negligible real difference. According to this calculator, a married head of household with 2 kids making 25-75K isn’t doing much better, and isn’t that who should be keeping most of their money?
Also...and this seems to just inexplicably escape the thought process of Republicans...the government needs sufficient revenue to operate. “Less government, less taxes are better” blah blah blah...why are our leading think tanks and banks dubious of these claims of growth? Maybe because it’s unrealistic, and it’s not going to all of a sudden spark a new wave of consumer spending. America isn’t instanteously needing that much more goods and services.
The mental gymnastics on this board right now are simply uncanny.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/17/upshot/tax-calculator.html
We have similar "family situations" - just hope yours doesn't include a worthless baby daddy...The articles I've read (CNBC) highlights that the big winner in the tax bill as being rental property owners due to the pass through benefits, but to be fair, due to my family situation I can't capitalize on it (my step-daughter lives in the home that I would normally be renting), so haven't analyzed it myself very closely.
I'll sign up as a "leftist greedy dolt" - the consensus on the various tools out there is I will save about $20k under the new plan AND I will get to keep the carried interest benefit. Big $ win. Don't like the plan. My eldest making about 1/12th what I do will get about $200 in savings - that is 1% of the benefit I will. @cableok can do the math, but even on a percentage basis I am 10x ahead of her...Wait...so someone admits their family is rich enough already, and doesn’t need this tax cut...and that’s a bad thing?
You should receive a larger $$ amount in taxes. You pay thousands upon thousands more in taxes.I'll sign up as a "leftist greedy dolt" - the consensus on the various tools out there is I will save about $20k under the new plan AND I will get to keep the carried interest benefit. Big $ win. Don't like the plan. My eldest making about 1/12th what I do will get about $200 in savings - that is 1% of the benefit I will. @cableok can do the math, but even on a percentage basis I am 10x ahead of her...
Not a fan of progressive income taxation I take it... Big fan of sales tax instead?You should receive a larger $$ amount in taxes. You pay thousands upon thousands more in taxes.
No, not a fan of progressive taxation. I don’t believe we should take more of someone on a percentage basis. Flat or fair tax for me.Not a fan of progressive income taxation I take it... Big fan of sales tax instead?
Maybe in your specific case it is even more on a percentage basis, but that would be an anomaly.I'll sign up as a "leftist greedy dolt" - the consensus on the various tools out there is I will save about $20k under the new plan AND I will get to keep the carried interest benefit. Big $ win. Don't like the plan. My eldest making about 1/12th what I do will get about $200 in savings - that is 1% of the benefit I will. @cableok can do the math, but even on a percentage basis I am 10x ahead of her...
He is serious. That's how he (and too many others) think. It's a mental disease.Why are we giving??? Are you being serious?
You do realize it is THEIR money!! They earned it. The government is not giving it to them. The government is simply not taking as much from them. And a majority of American tax payers will see a reduction in taxes.
This is the opposite of government greed.
He is serious. That's how he (and too many others) think. It's a mental disease.
Yeah all we need to do is simply amend the constitution.Repeal the 16th amendment. Problem solved.
As usual, you've misunderstood and made a moronic ass of yourself. A discussion about whether this tax plan is well conceived or good policy is very different from starting with the notion that the government is giving money to individuals who will, in reality, be keeping more of their earned income through paying a lower tax rate.LOL...let’s see...I’ve got 2 teams to pick from here:
1) Conservatives like yourself
2) Joint Committee on Taxation
Tax Policy Center
Brookings Institution
Wharton School of Business
Goldman Sachs
Federal Reserve
Yes...my mental disease of being on the winning team. Ohhhh, but I’m not accounting for that amazing 3+ percent annual growth you all latch on and cling to - hope and change, right?
LOL...let’s see...I’ve got 2 teams to pick from here:
1) Conservatives like yourself
2) Joint Committee on Taxation
Tax Policy Center
Brookings Institution
Wharton School of Business
Goldman Sachs
Federal Reserve
Yes...my mental disease of being on the winning team. Ohhhh, but I’m not accounting for that amazing 3+ percent annual growth you all latch on and cling to - hope and change, right?
I think you grossly overestimate the impact on the middle class, who will see a negligible real difference. According to this calculator, a married head of household with 2 kids making 25-75K isn’t doing much better, and isn’t that who should be keeping most of their money?
Also...and this seems to just inexplicably escape the thought process of Republicans...the government needs sufficient revenue to operate. “Less government, less taxes are better” blah blah blah...why are our leading think tanks and banks dubious of these claims of growth? Maybe because it’s unrealistic, and it’s not going to all of a sudden spark a new wave of consumer spending. America isn’t instanteously needing that much more goods and services.
The mental gymnastics on this board right now are simply uncanny.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/17/upshot/tax-calculator.html
Except the Democrats "progressive" tax curve always lands right on the middle class while they chirp about the rich paying their fair share.See the difference in your opinion and mine is that Republicans just wanted to reduce the tax burden flatly across the board (everyone pays less), where as Democrats want tax reduction to bend the progressiveness of the tax curve even further.
I don't have a problem with the tax cuts, but I was just hoping for reform. Paul Ryan said that there are tax incentives for companies to hire American workers. Does anyone know what that is? My experience working at very large companies doesn't give me any faith that they will do the right thing. However, I'm hoping I'm wrong.
You are arguing the merits of progressive taxation, which I agree with but are a different point (imo). The loudest chirping about this tax cut from the left and the media is that the rich get breaks too, rather than them being soaked to pay for tax elimination for the poorest classes.Except the Democrats "progressive" tax curve always lands right on the middle class while they chirp about the rich paying their fair share.
During the progressive Obama administration, the rich got richer, the poor got poorer, and more people joined the ranks of the poor. The middle class who avoided joining the ranks of the poor lived in relative stagnation.
We have similar "family situations" - just hope yours doesn't include a worthless baby daddy...
Income inequality much?Except the Democrats "progressive" tax curve always lands right on the middle class while they chirp about the rich paying their fair share.
During the progressive Obama administration, the rich got richer, the poor got poorer, and more people joined the ranks of the poor. The middle class who avoided joining the ranks of the poor lived in relative stagnation.
Yeah, Trump won't have the Fed Hoovering up 7+ trillion over 8 years like Obama did.Under appreciated by the Trumpets in all this is the good people of China who will be underwriting the $1.5 Trillion USD required to make this all work. Bravo China. Thanks for the loan...
Really boxing us in, Dave.Under appreciated by the Trumpets in all this is the good people of China who will be underwriting the $1.5 Trillion USD required to make this all work. Bravo China. Thanks for the loan...
We could of course print our way out of it, but to what end?Really boxing us in, Dave.
When demand for goods and services exceed the capacity to produce this goods and services on s persistent basis.We could of course print our way out of it, but to what end?
Serious question, at what point does the federal deficit cause you concern?