ADVERTISEMENT

This Should be Interesting

Absent from that piece is the fact that Trump has asked the DOJ IG to review to the concerns. This piece simply states "Justice Department officials." I wonder why they purposely left that out? This must be one of those great sources you posted about

Links? Bitching about sources and all without giving a source for said IG review...
 
Absent from that piece is the fact that Trump has asked the DOJ IG to review to the concerns. This piece simply states "Justice Department officials." I wonder why they purposely left that out? This must be one of those great sources you posted about
;)
 
And Trump reverses and no longer demands the release of the documents. LOL.

Clearly an attempt by Trump to change the conversation and get the media to focus somewhere else. Nice try, horrible failure though.

The joke show continues.
 
jokes on the libtards and people who thought wealth re-distribution was the american way

this outrage is beautiful
 

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic

Did she name them or just say "some officials"? I assume she would know whom it was who allegedly told her to do it. At least it names Page. If this were a NYT article, it would say: "An FBI agent with ties close to the Mueller investigation reported that senior FBI officials directed them to "get Hillary"." By the way, who could be that senior person given the role Page had and the subject target person. It would have to be Comey or Rosenstein, right? If she is telling the truth, then its even further evidence that Trump was right to fire them.
 
Did she name them or just say "some officials"? I assume she would know whom it was who allegedly told her to do it. At least it names Page. If this were a NYT article, it would say: "An FBI agent with ties close to the Mueller investigation reported that senior FBI officials directed them to "get Hillary"." By the way, who could be that senior person given the role Page had and the subject target person. It would have to be Comey or Rosenstein, right? If she is telling the truth, then its even further evidence that Trump was right to fire them.
It’s from her congressional testimony.
 
i don’t think anyone would agree that they always do

i don’t think banging porn stars while in a marriage is cool at all

but he did save america on his own dime from a most certain liberal/socialist decline

so while i wouldn’t share a foxhole with him i am grateful he’s been willing to take the hits for maga
rdcidad you are still talking about socialist Obama or Hilary even though when we had
our last argument one your supporters agreed that US had 4 years of over 4% growth during Obama's eight years even though when he took over an economy which was close to a depression economy. This year his own economy advisers are saying that the economy may have less than 3% growth. Best of luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokeabear
rdcidad you are still talking about socialist Obama or Hilary even though when we had
our last argument one your supporters agreed that US had 4 years of over 4% growth during Obama's eight years even though when he took over an economy which was close to a depression economy. This year his own economy advisers are saying that the economy may have less than 3% growth. Best of luck

you talking about obama the magic wand guy?

 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
rdcidad you are still talking about socialist Obama or Hilary even though when we had
our last argument one your supporters agreed that US had 4 years of over 4% growth during Obama's eight years even though when he took over an economy which was close to a depression economy. This year his own economy advisers are saying that the economy may have less than 3% growth. Best of luck

Obama had 4 years of 4% growth? I must have missed that economic achievement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Please go to your govt relevant website
I've been there. Did you mean he's had 4 quarters of 4% growth? Because that's a fact. But you stated 4 YEARS then compared it to Trump's 2.9% ANNUAL rate, which would net you at least 3 pinochio's on the fact-checker.
 
And you are still talking about Trump for him the American way is not to disclose his tax returns and keep his interest in all his businesses.Even in Pakistan politicians get in trouble if the dont disclose their tax returns.

tax returns?

you saying the sdny raiding his attys office was not enough?

at some point the trump presidency will be about political policy and votes

if trump doesn’t want to post his returns the american people have the choice not to vote for him

rule of law in pakistan is a joke
don’t conflate my country with yours
 
And you are still talking about Trump for him the American way is not to disclose his tax returns and keep his interest in all his businesses.Even in Pakistan politicians get in trouble if the dont disclose their tax returns.

and a big PS

this thread started in september was about text messages relevant to a

trumped up russia investigation

in our country this equates to a bloodless coup

sans bloodless
something pakistan is quite familiar with
 
I've been there. Did you mean he's had 4 quarters of 4% growth? Because that's a fact. But you stated 4 YEARS then compared it to Trump's 2.9% ANNUAL rate, which would net you at least 3 pinochio's on the fact-checker.
Sorry I meant 4 quarters. The amazing thing is that comparing presidents from Carter
the following has been the growth during all presidents.
Carter 3.4%
Reagan3.4%
Bush 2.0%
Clinton 3.7%
Bush 1.7%
Obama 2.1%
The republican presidents had bigger deficits than the democrats.The last president to have a surplus,even though his character was no better than Trump
 
tax returns?

you saying the sdny raiding his attys office was not enough?

at some point the trump presidency will be about political policy and votes

if trump doesn’t want to post his returns the american people have the choice not to vote for him

rule of law in pakistan is a joke
don’t conflate my country with yours
I am definitely not comparing US to Pakistan there is no comparison that is why I used the phrase even in Pakistan.
 
Well the previous prime minister is in jail, ex-president(head of a major party) is under trial I hope he goes to jail.Another former prime minister is under investigation.
 
Sorry I meant 4 quarters. The amazing thing is that comparing presidents from Carter
the following has been the growth during all presidents.
Carter 3.4%
Reagan3.4%
Bush 2.0%
Clinton 3.7%
Bush 1.7%
Obama 2.1%
The republican presidents had bigger deficits than the democrats.The last president to have a surplus,even though his character was no better than Trump

What's interesting is that the direction interest rates went in correlation to the growth. Trump achieving 2.9% growth in an environment where interest rates were increased by nearly 2% and the Fed works to unwind its balance sheet (QT) is significantly more impressive than generating 2.1% in an environment where interest rates are cut by 3.5% and the Fed is growing its balance sheet by flooding the market with free cash (aka QE).
 
Well the previous prime minister is in jail, ex-president(head of a major party) is under trial I hope he goes to jail.Another former prime minister is under investigation.

losing elections has consequences

trump told hillary because she’d be in jail
you can see her criminal deeds flash before her eyes, she’s naked as the day she was born

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT