And if DOJ refuses, does that give Trump the means to fire Sessions and Rosenstein for insubordination?
And if DOJ refuses, does that give Trump the means to fire Sessions and Rosenstein for insubordination?
Oops.
they can’t refuse
What about pages 13-16?
They already been declassified or is that where the really juicy stuff Trump wants to keep from getting out.
Draining the swamp would be declassifying it all....everything.
Not cherry picking....cherry picking is just protecting your own alligators, not draining the swamp.
What about pages 13-16?
They already been declassified or is that where the really juicy stuff Trump wants to keep from getting out.
Draining the swamp would be declassifying it all....everything.
Not cherry picking....cherry picking is just protecting your own alligators, not draining the swamp.
there’s nothing cherry picking about releasing the non partisan director of the fbi’s texts
There is something cherry picking about redacting three pages of the search warrant affidavit from disclosure.
Declassify it all...anything else is suspect and cherry picking.
Gotta protect those "sources and methods..."There is something cherry picking about redacting three pages of the search warrant affidavit from disclosure.
Declassify it all...anything else is suspect and cherry picking.
The Donald played it right
The leftover govt has way more to hide than Trump ever thought about.
yep peeps don’t care about russian hookers anymore
go huber go
But...Valerie Plame!There is something cherry picking about redacting three pages of the search warrant affidavit from disclosure.
Declassify it all...anything else is suspect and cherry picking.
Interdasting
But...Valerie Plame!
Is Trump draining that swamp or playing the same old games?
Dunno. And that’s the problem. There could be legitimate reasons to withhold the info, but since almost everyone in Washington is untrustworthy....Is Trump draining that swamp or playing the same old games?
True Pundit? Hahahahahahaha Mr. “Thomas Paine” Moore is a joke and so is his propagandizing conspiracy site. Hilarious that this is your ace in the hole.
True Pundit? Hahahahahahaha Mr. “Thomas Paine” Moore is a joke and so is his propagandizing conspiracy site. Hilarious that this is your ace in the hole.
Washington Post discussed this 10 days ago:True Pundit? Hahahahahahaha Mr. “Thomas Paine” Moore is a joke and so is his propagandizing conspiracy site. Hilarious that this is your ace in the hole.
True Pundit? Hahahahahahaha Mr. “Thomas Paine” Moore is a joke and so is his propagandizing conspiracy site. Hilarious that this is your ace in the hole.
lolWashington Post discussed this 10 days ago:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...65d92a3585d_story.html?utm_term=.6ef006af57ed
Washington Post discussed this 10 days ago:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...65d92a3585d_story.html?utm_term=.6ef006af57ed
So just link the credible Washington Post, instead of an exjournalist with an axe to grind with the FBI.Don't be to hard on him his handlers have filled his head with nonsense.
Looks like both messengers had the correct content.So just link the credible Washington Post, instead of an exjournalist with an axe to grind with the FBI.
The content wasnt the focus in this instance. The messenger was. I’ll put up my sources all day every day compared to True Pundit, ZeroHedge, DailyWire, personal blog flavor of the week, etc, etc.
Dunno. And that’s the problem. There could be legitimate reasons to withhold the info, but since almost everyone in Washington is untrustworthy....
What are your "sources?"I’ll put up my sources all day every day compared to True Pundit, ZeroHedge, DailyWire, personal blog flavor of the week, etc, etc.
Assuming facts not in evidence councilor.Those three pages...and only those?
Signs point to chicanery is what my magic eight ball says,
"Engaging in a conversation with mentally ill people is a fruitless venture." -- AC (September 9, 2018)“Counselor”