Did you forget to read the part where I said the first girl in the 2nd post (2nd girl overall) was legal open carry?
This photo is triggering liberals and soyboys
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
Did you forget to read the part where I said the first girl in the 2nd post (2nd girl overall) was legal open carry?
He has already shown REPEATEDLY that he isn’t.
where have you ever vbacked down and shown contrition? maybe you have but I’m not remembering it
Re-read the thread. You and others have this false narrative that you love to believe, JD specifically.
I told him, and he doesn’t want to admit it (ego), that I stood corrected on 2 of them. One (2nd girl overall) I said was legal open carry, which he’s still digging his heels in on for some reason (ego).
I'm not so sure that he's deficient in knowledge. I thought he was in law school and doing an internship at some point. Maybe I'm getting him confused with someone else.
Nope. Read it.
What I said in reply applies to all three. All three are carrying and displaying legally (with the caveat that they clearly and obviously are under Oklahoma law and that I doubt Tennessee law is any more restrictive). Then you cited a Tennessee law you seemingly contended she was violating, and I explained how she is almost surely not violating that particular statute.
You now have the burden of providing your legal authority for your contention that any of them are violating the law in their display of the weapon in the picture. I believe it is your contention that because one of the pictures displays a gun in a “concealed holster” that displaying it openly in that holster constitutes some kind of a crime.
Or don’t provide it...like I said, I’m completely good with leaving it exactly where it is. Your continued argument is not with me.
You’re an idiot...
I admitted you corrected me on the 2nd one. Now are you gonna admit you’re wrong about what I said on the first one? I’m guessing not.
You admitted you stood corrected on two of them. I corrected you on the third as well. I contend you therefore have stood corrected on all three. Because you believe you are correct on the third (you aren’t, but I am good with you believing you are) you deny you stand corrected on the third.
I’ve told you, you’re argument isn’t with me.
I’m more than happy leaving our responses exactly where they lay.
You might want to go answer Chi’s legal question though...with actual citation to law. I would enjoy seeing that.
You’re not right about what I said about all 3 and you know it, but your ego prevents you from admitting I said the 2nd girl (overall) was legal open carry.
I’m not going to answer Chi because he’s literally asked 7 times for an answer in less than 4 hours.
Bitch! Total cognitive dissonance on your part.
You know you're wrong and just can't admit it. Nothing more dangerous than weaponized ignorance that is absolutely sure they are correct.
I'll take that as an admission that you are totally incorrect and full of crap.
I stated I stood corrected on the first and 3rd girls. I said very clearly the 2nd girl is legal open carry, which I’m right about.
Now, tell me I’m lying or can’t admit anything...
says the daily victim of “unprovoked” ad hominem attacks.
Just answer my question from the earlier post. It is totally isolated to the first two posts in this thread. It has nothing to do with the others...
I'm not trolling at all. You made a statement of fact. I'm just asking you to prove it. Otherwise, admit you were talking out your ass.
I'm not talking about those at all. I'm only talking about the subject of the original post. Focus on that. The first two posts in this thread are all I'm talking about. There is a photo of a woman with a firearm. You said as a fact she was breaking the law. I'm just asking you to give citation and prove it.
That was one I said I mistaken on. I said the 2nd girl (with a black gun in a black holster) was legal open carry. None of you will admit that.
I know I’m supposed to be the “board villain” and all, but you all can’t even give a little bit when you’ve dug your heels in. JD’s still convinced he’s got me on all 3...and he hasn’t, but ego prevents him from ever being wrong about...anything.
Last edited:
Very good. I'm glad to see that you admit you were wrong in your initial assessment.
Which one of these two are you still contending is not legally carrying and why?
???? So which one of those two are not legal? I'm not being dense. Just wanted to be clear so we can focus the conversation.
They’re both legal as it pertains to the states they’re in. I’m not going to wait for any kind of admittance from anyone about what actually originally stated about the girl with holster on the outside legal open carrying. Apparently I’m “wrong” about that (I know I’m not).
Okay, I'm open to the conversation about how the holster is a consideration. Can you tell me how that is germane to the legality of open or concealed carry?
Apparently there is a gif for every occasion.
Extensive research is the key.
Your argument isn’t with me.
I’m completely good with you believing whatever you want...I’m an idiot...my ego won’t allow me to admit I’m wrong...one (or any number of the girls are carrying illegally)...WHATEVER.
You’re not going to answer Chi because you can’t though. When have you EVER passed up an opportunity to prove a member of the conservative circlejerk dead wrong and put it to them.
Right now, you are literally continuing to argue and engage with someone that is completely “whatever” and not arguing with you while at the same time refusing to engage with the person that has called you out.
You’re mistaken in your statement of law as to the third as well.
Maybe things will clear up if you label the ladies A, B, and C and denote the time shortly after OP as t=0 and the time now as t=1.
you are going to be eating those words (word) when I bring a final peace to this thread.
No, that isn’t what I said at all.
I said all three are fine they way they are (certainly in Oklahoma and I doubt Tennessee is more restrictive), so that you now stood corrected on all accounts.
I can freely admit you said whatever you believe you said. Watch....WHATEVER YOU SAY YOU SAID, I ADMIT YOU SAID THAT.
But this entire portion of the discussion is a tangential, meaningless issue distracting away from the original issue of who is or isn’t exhibiting illegally. I and Chi say none of them are exhibiting illegally. Chi is asking you to prove your contention that at least one of them is carrying illegally...and you’re declining to support that contention.
But....WHATEVER.
There are three pictures of ladies in this thread...are ANY of them exhibiting or carrying illegally as it pertains to the states they are in?
