ADVERTISEMENT

This Cowboy blocking won’t be enough against Arkansas and Utah

OKSTATE1

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
48,672
65,772
113
Edmond, Oklahoma

This Cowboy blocking won’t be enough against Arkansas and Utah​

  • Aug 31, 2024 Updated 5 hrs ago

Bill Haisten

Tulsa World Sports Columnist & Writer

STILLWATER — The South Dakota State-Oklahoma State football match-up was so interesting in part because the Ollie Gordon run game is so big for the Cowboys, while strong run defense was a defining characteristic of back-to-back FCS champion Jackrabbit teams.

Last season, SDSU allowed only 3.2 yards per attempt.

Impressive, but there was the belief that Oklahoma State certainly would do better than 3.2 against the Jackrabbit defense.

Oklahoma State did do better during Saturday’s opener at Boone Pickens Stadium.

Kinda.

Barely.

Against a lower-division defense — albeit a really good lower-division defense — the 17th-ranked Cowboys averaged 3.3 yards per rush attempt.

With the most experienced offensive line in major-college football, and with 2023 national rushing leader Ollie Gordon operating behind that line, the Cowboys rushed for only 138 yards in a 44-20 victory.

While Oklahoma State did end the Jacks’ 29-game win streak, this is a Cowboy team with aspirations that include the Big 12 title and a place on the College Football Playoff bracket.
If the Cowboys are destined for that type of season, they’ll have to block much better than they did on Saturday.

66d3af04db5ee.image.jpg

Ollie Gordon rushed for 104 yards and scored three TDs as the 17th-ranked OSU Cowboys opened with a 44-20 victory over South Dakota State.
Daniel Shular, Tulsa World

Gordon scored on run plays of 12 yards and 1 yard, and he scored also on a 22-yard pass play, but there never was a point at which the OSU offensive line took control of the game.


That 12-yard Gordon TD was the longest run play all day for Oklahoma State.

On several occasions during an uncomfortably warm but not terribly hot afternoon, there were stoppages in play as Jackrabbit defenders were affected by leg cramps.

I kept thinking after halftime that the OSU O-line would begin to dominate the visitors, but it never happened. On 15 third-period rush attempts, OSU netted only 53 yards.

Mike Gundy’s take on the 3.3-yards-per-carry debut of the 2024 Cowboys: “I thought we were average running the ball. (The Jackrabbits) played good defense. They always have. . . . But I don’t feel like we ran the football as well as we should.”

Gordon’s reaction: “I just feel like we need to get back in the lab with the linemen.”

A few years ago, the offensive line routinely was the most effective position group in a Cowboy football game.

On a heavier-than-expected total of 27 carries, Gordon finished with 104 yards. I wrote last week about the importance of getting meaningful production from Oklahoma State’s backup running backs, so that Gordon doesn’t have to run the football 27 times every week. In November, Gundy will want Gordon to be as fresh as possible.

Against South Dakota State, backfield backups Trent Howland and Sesi Vailahi combined for only 11 rushing yards on eight carries.


Next Saturday, and for the first time since 1978, an Arkansas Razorback football team visits Stillwater. Arkansas was picked to finish 14th in the 16-team SEC, but the Razorbacks will have larger, faster front-seven athletes than South Dakota State brought to town.

In their opener, the Razorbacks also faced an FCS opponent. With 10 touchdowns on 10 offensive possessions, Arkansas obliterated Arkansas-Pine Bluff 70-0.

66d3a0ee5c1b9.image.jpg


OSU’s Ollie Gordon scores one of his three touchdowns against South Dakota State.
Daniel Shular, Tulsa World

Against the Arkansas defensive front, Arkansas-Pine Bluff finished with 7 rushing yards.

Would you rather beat South Dakota State or lose to South Alabama?

Stupid question.

Objective No. 1 in any game is to win, and Oklahoma State’s 24-point victory over a solid Jackrabbit squad is immeasurably more appealing than last year’s 26-point home loss to South Alabama.

It is concerning, though, that OSU on Saturday didn’t reach the 100-yard mark in team rushing until the three-minute mark of the third period.

I watched SDSU-OSU through bifocal lenses. Through one lens, I focused intently on OSU’s offensive line. The Jacks loaded up against the run, which does explain to some extent why OSU’s rushing numbers were so modest – and why Alan Bowman was not sacked and rarely was pressured at all.

Through the other lens of my imaginary bifocals, I envisioned how Oklahoma State’s offensive-line personnel might fare against Arkansas and in the Sept. 21 Big 12 opener against league favorite Utah. On Sept. 28, there is a major challenge at Kansas State.


To paraphrase Gundy, what I saw on Saturday was OK, but the blocking wasn’t nearly what it needs to be against Utah and Kansas State.

From an awful start last season, OSU established a better identity and finished with a Big 12 Championship game appearance and 10 wins.

It appears that line play might be a problem, and this isn’t a nitpicky criticism of a Cowboy team that won 44-20 over the best team in FCS.

Go back 12 years or 15 years and watch the video of those Oklahoma State offensive lines. With execution and superior conditioning, they crushed the spirit of most opponents.
As Gordon stated, it’s time for the OSU coaches and the Cowboys to get back to the lab.
 
SDSU was selling out to stop the run, and we punished them for it. I REALLY HOPE others try that as well. This article doesn’t really cover that properly. The best O lines have a problem with 8 against 5

But other teams at the end of games figure out how to run the ball, get first downs and chew clock. Kind of disappointing we couldn't even come close to doing that in the 4th with an All American rb
 
SDSU was selling out to stop the run, and we punished them for it. I REALLY HOPE others try that as well. This article doesn’t really cover that properly. The best O lines have a problem with 8 against 5
Yeah, everybody else will too. I didn't think we punished them all that much for it -- there was one high, floating bomb our receiver ran under, it wasn't exactly a great throw. I was underwhelmed by our OL and qb play. I know statistically he looked great, but the receivers (who are aweome) bailed him out with some good catches, too.
 
But other teams at the end of games figure out how to run the ball, get first downs and chew clock. Kind of disappointing we couldn't even come close to doing that in the 4th with an All American rb
Not really. No one can run it all day long to a stacked box at the end of a game. You have to look at our starting point this year versus last year. This team will improve as the season goes on barring any major injuries.
 
We’re very average on the offensive line talent wise. The biggest issue is their feet. Slow footed heavy people don’t all of the sudden start moving their feet with ease.

I will admit, most of the run stuffing came from the second and third level and that’s on Dunn to exploit! You throw over the top in play action. We were vanilla trying not to do too much on tape for future opponents to use.

Still, when you can’t make a yard and just about anybody stuffs you on third and fourth and short, that’s not good from a physical standpoint. And it all comes back to poor drive off the ball and a lack of foot movement. The maddening thing is it has gone on for all six years these linemen have been here! It obviously isn’t emphasized or worked on enough to change it. We do work on and put a premium on pass blocking and we’re pretty good at that. So good at retreating and not good on drive blocking.

Our line play on both sides of the ball isn’t nearly good enough to win titles or function effectively in the CFP if you got there. That’s been our history and it still exists. It’s the primary weakness of any Poke team and apparently always will be.

We don’t have any difference makers that are elite enough to dominate anybody. So, no can’t miss players who are guaranteed first round NFL draft picks. Those people play and are paid elsewhere not Stillwater, Oklahoma.
 
We should be able to get a little more push when we have to, but their coach talked about their gameplan going into the game and that was to stop the run and prevent the big plays. We eventually forced them to adjust and Owens popped off his big play. There’s going to be teams doing that so hopefully Bowman and Co can come through when needed
 
Looked like we tried to go back to a lot of zone blocking like the beginning of last year. Any of you that know x and o's notice that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwel9339
I agree with dnhall for the most part but our skill people are elite and that can cover some talent issues on the off line. Our D line is average in talent but we have a lot of them and skillful usage of that can help. I notice that 99 had the most snaps and he might be a keeper. I also hope that Kale might be an answer opposite Black. Fix that one corner issue and yesterday looks a lot different. The other thing? SDS struck me as a pretty good well coached team.
 
I agree with dnhall for the most part but our skill people are elite and that can cover some talent issues on the off line. Our D line is average in talent but we have a lot of them and skillful usage of that can help. I notice that 99 had the most snaps and he might be a keeper. I also hope that Kale might be an answer opposite Black. Fix that one corner issue and yesterday looks a lot different. The other thing? SDS struck me as a pretty good well coached team.
They struck me as middle of the pack if in the B12 or close to it. They had good size, good athletes, and skill positions. I'm glad we approached them as a p4 team, as we needed to do so. BTW, I thought Bowman always looked in control, no interceptions, lots of completions, which means that the ball was catchable, if not perfect. I was pleasantly surprised. Our D will get better too I think.
 
We ran a lot of zone read option. When we are doing this, it's hard to run a lot of gap scheme plays. I would rather see Dunn call designed gap scheme run plays or play action passes.

Additionally, Ollie needs to hit the hole hard and fast. He spent way too much time dancing around at the line of scrimmage and not going full speed. He needs to be way more decisive in his reads.
 
Seemed like they always swarmed right to the ball and tackled guys like Pressley very well in space
I agree. That’s not too visible with our play yesterday. Swarming to the ball wasn’t real evident in a lot of our defensive plays. Still, we tackled pretty well just not with a lot of help.

There used to be an old coaching axiom that we better see multiple hats in the picture frame when the eye in the sky shuts off on a play! That’s an indication your entire defense is dialed in and focused to play!

We saw #3 in our secondary unfocused and he got schooled. So no guarantees your entire defense is all there from an intensity perspective. That’s unacceptable and will provide a great teaching point #3 better learn from or pine time will be his reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwel9339
Looked like we tried to go back to a lot of zone blocking like the beginning of last year. Any of you that know x and o's notice that?
Just like the start of last year. Two reasons why we run zone is that it is much easier to install and master versus gap. Gap requires timing of all involved to work so we will see gap soon. We also ran a lot of rpo’s yesterday which is easier to do with zone.
We did use some H, G gap yesterday and I expect we expand more gap if needed against the hogs.
 
Back then we led the Big XII in rushing 4 straight seasons. But Gundy ditched it for red zone yardage conversions that have never materialized since Monken walked out the door. Still insane to think…Gundy set that aside when he took back over.
Almost like changing the scheme on defense a year after having a top 5 unit..
 
How did everyone think that Glass played, yesterday?
 
Back then we led the Big XII in rushing 4 straight seasons. But Gundy ditched it for red zone yardage conversions that have never materialized since Monken walked out the door. Still insane to think…Gundy set that aside when he took back over.
Never materialized?

Like when Comrade Chubba ran for 2000 or Ollie led the nation in rushing last season?
 
I still think if we are playing legit D1 defense, that pass from Bowman to Owens is picked off..that was a wounded duck…
 
SDSU sold out to stop the run? That's not what the tape shows...


Looks like they played with guys starting back in a zone to keep passes in front of them, but were crashing their front level guys down towards the LOS at the snap. Thats a way to stop the run when you don’t think you’re as big as your opponent at the point of attack. It’s why there were so many of them on the jet sweeps too. Their coach literally said as much in the post game interview so you’re arguing with him too now
 
Back then we led the Big XII in rushing 4 straight seasons. But Gundy ditched it for red zone yardage conversions that have never materialized since Monken walked out the door. Still insane to think…Gundy set that aside when he took back over.
Yeah, can’t believe we tried to evolve. We have more wins than all but like 9 schools over the last decade, so whatever. Maybe we should have stuck with the T-Formation offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BWM85 and bwel9339
Looks like they played with guys starting back in a zone to keep passes in front of them, but were crashing their front level guys down towards the LOS at the snap. Thats a way to stop the run when you don’t think you’re as big as your opponent at the point of attack. It’s why there were so many of them on the jet sweeps too. Their coach literally said as much in the post game interview so you’re arguing with him too now
Just counted Bowman's completions from LOS:
LOS +20: 1
LOS 11-15: 3
LOS 6-10: 3
LOS 1-5: 7
LOS: 1
Behind LOS: 10

Key here is with Bowman at QB there is essentially no reason to not keep 10 defenders within 10 yards of LOS and maybe have a Cover 1 safety to backstop.

What's deceptive is that Bowman typically drops back 10 yards, so even a behind the LOS or LOS pass looks fairly reasonable until you track the pass in relation to LOS.

We also rarely/never see the classic 7 yard out route that Weeds and Rudolph took into the NFL.
 
Looked like we tried to go back to a lot of zone blocking like the beginning of last year. Any of you that know x and o's notice that?
I thought the same thing. Not sure why we go back to it especially when it appears we haven’t improved even with added experience.
 
Just counted Bowman's completions from LOS:
LOS +20: 1
LOS 11-15: 3
LOS 6-10: 3
LOS 1-5: 7
LOS: 1
Behind LOS: 10

Key here is with Bowman at QB there is essentially no reason to not keep 10 defenders within 10 yards of LOS and maybe have a Cover 1 safety to backstop.

What's deceptive is that Bowman typically drops back 10 yards, so even a behind the LOS or LOS pass looks fairly reasonable until you track the pass in relation to LOS.

We also rarely/never see the classic 7 yard out route that Weeds and Rudolph took into the NFL.
You keep bitching about Bowman. You apparently have a axe to grind. Give it a rest LDP.
 
Just counted Bowman's completions from LOS:
LOS +20: 1
LOS 11-15: 3
LOS 6-10: 3
LOS 1-5: 7
LOS: 1
Behind LOS: 10

Key here is with Bowman at QB there is essentially no reason to not keep 10 defenders within 10 yards of LOS and maybe have a Cover 1 safety to backstop.

What's deceptive is that Bowman typically drops back 10 yards, so even a behind the LOS or LOS pass looks fairly reasonable until you track the pass in relation to LOS.

We also rarely/never see the classic 7 yard out route that Weeds and Rudolph took into the NFL.
Folks!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT