Corroborating witness #4.
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/24...-sexually-assault-her-says-it-never-happened/
No bueno.
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/24...-sexually-assault-her-says-it-never-happened/
No bueno.
Very possible. I hadn't heard anything about Leland having health issues. I have heard that about Judge though.Agree.
There are other explanations though. Dr Ford said she only clearly remembers 6 people being present (herself and 5 others). She has said there may have been others. In which case, it might not have been as crazy for Leland to have been left there all alone with 4 boys (since there were other girls there.
Also, Leland apparently has significant health issues. It may be that she is not fully lucid at this time.
It will be interesting to see if the FBI can get anything useful out of her. Questions like, "Did you know BK and MJ in HS?" and "Do you ever remember being at a house with them when underage drinking was going on?"
No.
If he doesn't ascend to the SC, he is going to take a significant financial hit. No raise. No SCOTUS level benefits. No being asked to teach/lecture on college campuses in the future. No lifetime appointment.
judge is a cancer survivor and a alcoholic....a recovering alcoholic.Very possible. I hadn't heard anything about Leland having health issues. I have heard that about Judge though.
Ford said in her testimony when asked by the prosecutor lady why Leland didn't support Ford's allegations that basically Leland is an unreliable witness since she has "health issues".Very possible. I hadn't heard anything about Leland having health issues. I have heard that about Judge though.
Corroborating witness #4.
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/24...-sexually-assault-her-says-it-never-happened/
No bueno.
Do we know if it's true? Has someone with a memory capable of storing more than the immediate past 0.8 seconds indicated she had health problems that would make her an unreliable witness?Ford said in her testimony when asked by the prosecutor lady why Leland didn't support Ford's allegations that basically Leland is an unreliable witness since she has "health issues".
What is the salary and benefit difference between the job he has now and scotus? Why can’t people who are on high courts but not on the scotus lecture on campus? Do you have anything to back that up? Do you know federal judges that are being kept off campuses?
The point is that if the general public believes Ford, he won’t be invited to college campuses.
We do not know it to be true. I think I will go ahead and say it isn't true. She probably responded exactly like her lawyers told her to.Do we know if it's true? Has someone with a memory capable of storing more than the immediate past 0.8 seconds indicated she had health problems that would make her an unreliable witness?
Roger Big Pappa.We do not know it to be true. I think I will go ahead and say it isn't true. She probably responded exactly like her lawyers told her to.
@Been Jammin @my_2cents @Clinton Scott @Pokeabear
Are you guys ok with this “full investigation” also including Ford and Feinstein? Ford’s phone records, emails, text messages, etc?
I don't have an objection to this as long as Kavanaugh's phone records, emails, and text messages are also included.
Not how traumatic memory works.
It's only a traumatic memory if it actually happened.
It's also exactly how people who don't want to be charged with purgury act.
Since none of us know what is true, maybe we shouldn't be jumping to all these conclusions
Since none of us know what is true, maybe we shouldn't be jumping to all these conclusions.
lmao!
Every conservative and/or Trump supporter on this board has been jumping to conclusions for weeks about these accusations. And those who have called for an investigation (so as not to jump to conclusions) have been mocked by those same conservatives and/or Trump supporters.
But NOW, "maybe", we shouldn't be jumping to conclusions????
![]()
I haven't jumped to conclusions.
So you wanted a further FBI investigation? You advocated for that on this board?
No I want her to file charges with Maryland authorities and handle this as a criminal matter.
Accusers? Who are we talking about?But this is also a judicial nomination to the Supreme Court (lifetime appointment), which demanded a full investigation on these accusations leveled against the nominee.
Who is telling the truth PDT, Kavanaugh's accusers or Kavanaugh?
But this is also a judicial nomination to the Supreme Court (lifetime appointment), which demanded a full investigation on these accusations leveled against the nominee.
Who is telling the truth PDT, Kavanaugh's accusers or Kavanaugh?
Accusers? Who are we talking about?
Are the witnesses telling the truth?
The three women who have came forward.
I don't know.
This may be hard for some on here to understand, but I don't know who is telling the truth about all of this. That is why I wanted a further investigation.
Sure, I have my general "opinions" on who may or may not be telling the truth. But I have drawn no firm conclusions.
The question is whether he is PROFESSIONALLY QUALIFIED to be a part of SCOTUS Is his ability to rule on constitutional matters tied to what may or may not have happened in high school?
Only a fool would try and guess if either was telling the truth here.
You are never going to know who told the truth.
Perhaps. But the Senators will know more than they know now (and probably us when it all gets leaked). And of course, there is always the possibility the investigation does reveal evidence of great importance.
There was NEVER any harm in investigating this further. Many Republicans simply got caught up in partisan nonsense.
There's zero senators interested in the truth.
I thought it was 5.
I disagree.
Still waiting on an answer to this btw: Let's assume for a moment the accusations are true. Do you believe a man who has committed sexually assault should sit as a Justice on the Supreme Court?
There's no reason to assume the allegations are true.
Why is the senate only concerned with 1?The three women who "have came forward."
Why is the senate only concerned with 1?
And as you have posted, there is also no reason to assume the allegations are false. Therefore, they could be true.
And I'm asking you a simple question. If they are true, do you believe a man who has committed sexual assault should be a Justice on the Supreme Court? Yes or no?